[1]徐建庆,樊伟伟,杨喜佳,等.达芬奇机械人双侧腹股沟疝修补术临床应用研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(2):173-176.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.02.012]
　XU Jianqing,FAN Weiwei,YANG Xijia,et al.Clinical effect of Da Vinci robot bilateral inguinal hernia repair[J].,2021,50(2):173-176.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.02.012]
点击复制

达芬奇机械人双侧腹股沟疝修补术临床应用研究
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
50
期数:
2021年2期
页码:
173-176
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical effect of Da Vinci robot bilateral inguinal hernia repair
作者:
徐建庆; 樊伟伟; 杨喜佳; 周 亮
(西安高新医院普外科,陕西 西安710075)
Author(s):
XU Jianqing; FAN Weiwei; YANG Xijia; ZHOU Liang
(Department of General Surgery,Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital,Xi'an 710075,China)
关键词:
腹股沟疝;  外科学;  达芬奇机械人;  腹腔镜修补术;  对比研究
Keywords:
Inguinal hernia;  Surgery;  Da Vinci robot;  Laparoscopic repair;  Comparative study
分类号:
R 656.2
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.02.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:对比分析达芬奇机械人双侧腹股沟疝修补术与腹腔镜修补术的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析双侧腹股沟疝患者的手术资料,根据手术方式分为达芬奇机械人双侧腹股沟疝修补术组(观察组26例)和腹腔镜疝修补术组(对照组30例); 比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后疼痛时间、住院时间、住院费用及术后并发症。结果:两组患者均顺利完成手术,相比对照组患者,观察组患者的住院费用较高[(39695.3±1221.8)元与(19825.4±1132.5)元],但手术操作时间减少[(182.3±12.6)min与(211.3±20.5)min],两组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05); 两组术中出血量、住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05); 两组术后并发症发生率比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论:达芬奇机械人双侧腹股沟疝修补与腹腔镜修补术在手术疗效及安全性上无明显差异,但具有手术操作时间短、术后并发症发生率低的特点。
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Da Vinci robot and laparoscopic in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernia.Methods:The surgical data of patients with bilateral inguinal hernia were retrospectively analyzed.According to the surgical method,they were divided into observation group(Da Vinci robot bilateral inguinal hernia repair,26 cases)and control group(laparoscopic hernia repair,30 cases).The operation time,intraoperative bleeding,postoperative exhaust time,postoperative pain time,hospital stay,hospitalization costs and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:Both groups of patients successfully completed the operation.Compared with the control group,the observation group had higher hospitalization costs [(39695.3±1221.8)yuan vs.(19825.4±1132.5)yuan],but the operation time was reduced [(182.3±12.6))min vs.(211.3±20.5)min],the difference was statistically significant(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups(all P>0.05).There was statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(all P<0.05).Conclusion:There is no significant difference between Da Vinci robot bilateral inguinal hernia repair and laparoscopic repair in terms of clinical efficacy and safety,but the former has the characteristics of short operation time and low postoperative complications.

参考文献/References:

[1] Wang J,Ji G,Yang Z,et al.Prospective randomized,double-blind,placebo controlled trial to evaluate infection prevention in adult patients after tension-free inguinal hernia repair[J].Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther,2013,51(12):924-931.
[2] 艾万朝,周旭坤,张成建,等.腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术的临床对比分析[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志:电子版,2016,10(4):270-272.
[3] Bracale U,Melillo P,Pignata G,et al.Which is the best laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair:TEP or TAPP?A systematic review of the literature with a network meta-analysis[J].Surg Endosc,2012,26(12):3355-3366.
[4] Antoniou SA,Antoniou GA,Bartsch DK,et al.Transabdominal preperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia:A mata-analysis of randomized studies[J].Am J Surg,2013,206(2):245-252.
[5] Braumann C,Jacobi CA,Menenak C,et al.Robotie-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery with the Da Vinci system:A 4-year experience in a single institution[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Pemutan Tech,2008,18(3):260-266.
[6] Novara G,Ficarra V,Mocellin S,et al.Systematic review and meta-nalysis of studies reporting oneologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostateetomy[J].Eur Urol,2012,62(3):382-404.
[7] Goh AC,Gill IS,Lee DJ,et al.Robotic intracorporeal orthotopie ileal neobladder:Replicating open surgical principles[J].Eur Urol,2012,62(5):891-901.
[8] Ito F,Jarrard D,Gould JC.Transabdominal preperitonealrobotic inguinal hernia repair[J].Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2008,18(3):397-399.
[9] 李健文,王明刚,唐建雄,等.腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志:电子版,2013,7(5):505-512.
[10] 蒋会勇,马 锐,郭一君,等.达芬奇机器人腹股沟疝十二例修补术[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志:电子版,2016,10(5):326-328.
[11] Birch DW.Characterizing Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair[J].Can J Surg,2007,50(3):195-201.
[12] 邰沁文,张金辉,温 浩,等.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术并发症的防治(附124例)[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志:电子版,2011,5(3):337-342.
[13] 韩继明,张 平,高根五,等.充填式无张力疝修补术的临床应用[J].中国普通外科杂志,2003,12(11):863.
[14] Dwyer PJ,Kingsnorth AN,Molloy RG,et al.Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair[J].Br J Surg,2005,92(2):166-170.
[15] 田 文,郗洪庆.达芬奇机械人疝手术与发展趋势[J].中华普外科手术学杂志:电子版,2017,11(1):5-7.

相似文献/References:

[1]李克峰,王 静△,张建标.全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补网片固定术对腹股沟疝患者慢性疼痛及基质金属蛋白酶水平的影响*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(8):1013.
　LI Kefeng,WANG Jing,ZHANG Jianbiao..The effects of total extraperitoneal mesh repair on chronic pain and its effect on metalloproteinases[J].,2019,(2):1013.
[2]王 铎,李 胜△.清创术和伤口Ⅰ期缝合治疗腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染疗效观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(9):1206.
[3]刘 明,常红侠△.右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜下腹股沟〖JZ〗斜疝高位结扎术患儿血流动力学及麻醉质量的影响研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(10):1268.
　LIU Ming,CHANG Hongxia..Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine on the transverse hemifacial plane block on〖JZ〗hemodynamics and anesthesia quality in children undergoing high ligation of inguinal hernia[J].,2019,(2):1268.
[4]贾 杉,加 莉△.外伤性脑出血患者术后感染病原菌分布特点及与炎症反应和氧化应激关系探讨[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(5):564.
　JIA Shan,JIA Li..Distribution of pathogenic bacteria in patients with traumatic cerebral hemorrhage after operation and expression of inflammatory stress index in serum[J].,2020,49(2):564.
[5]蒋 励,许 耀,王世龙,等.微创经皮锁钉钢板在四肢骨折治疗中的临床应用及对患者肢体功能的影响研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(6):683.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2020.06.011]
　JIANG Li,XU Yao,WANG Shilong,et al.Clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous locking plate in treatment of patients with limb fractures and its effect on limb function[J].,2020,49(2):683.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2020.06.011]
[6]巩玉亮.两种术式治疗成人腹股沟疝疗效及对患者术后股静脉血流速度、疼痛情况的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(11):1367.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.11.011]
　GONG Yuliang.Effect of two surgical treatments on inguinal hernia and their influence on postoperative femoral vein blood flow velocity and pain in adult patients[J].,2021,50(2):1367.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.11.011]
[7]胡 泽,李 艳,邵 军.腹股沟疝患者血清高迁移率族蛋白B1和Toll样受体4水平变化及检测意义[J].陕西医学杂志,2025,54(2):253.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2025.02.023]
　HU Ze,LI Yan,SHAO Jun.Changes and detection significance of serum high mobility group protein B1 and Toll-like receptor 4 in patients with inguinal hernia[J].,2025,54(2):253.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2025.02.023]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-28