[1]庄莹莹,屈丽虹,闫 辉△.靶控输注丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼对胆囊切除术患者血流动力学和术后认知水平的影响*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(11):1479-1481，封3.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.11.028]
　ZHUANG Yingying,QU Lihong,YAN Hui..Effects of target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil on hemodynamics and postoperative cognitive level in patients undergoing cholecystectomy[J].,2020,49(11):1479-1481，封3.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.11.028]
点击复制

靶控输注丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼对胆囊切除术患者血流动力学和术后认知水平的影响*
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
49
期数:
2020年11期
页码:
1479-1481，封3
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil on hemodynamics and postoperative cognitive level in patients undergoing cholecystectomy
作者:
庄莹莹; 屈丽虹; 闫 辉△
空军军医大学唐都医院(西安710038)
Author(s):
ZHUANG Yingying; QU Lihong; YAN Hui.
Tangdu Hospital of Air Force Medical University(Xi'an 710038)
关键词:
胆囊切除术;  瑞芬太尼;  丙泊酚;  血流动力学;  认知水平;  靶控输注
Keywords:
Cholecystectomy;  Remifentanil;  Propofol;  Hemodynamics;  Cognitive level;  Tarteg controlled infusion
分类号:
R657.4
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.11.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨靶控输注丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼对胆囊切除术患者血流动力学和术后认知水平的影响。方法:选取86例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者,分为对照组(静脉输注丙泊酚、芬太尼)和试验组(靶控输注丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼),各43例。比较两组围手术期心率、血压、数字疼痛强度量表(NRS)、警觉镇静评分量表(OAAS)、简易精神状态量表(MMSE)评分、术后恢复及术后并发症的发生情况。结果:①相比插管前水平,两组插管后心率和舒张压均明显提高(P<0.05); 试验组插管前、插管后心率和血压水平与对照组比较,均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。②两组拔管后24 h时NRS评分均低于拔管时,对照组OAAS评分高于拔管时,试验组OAAS和MMSE评分均高于拔管时(P<0.05); 试验组拔管后24 h时NRS评分较对照组明显减少,MMSE评分较对照组明显提高(P<0.05)。③试验组定向力完全恢复时间较对照组明显缩短(P<0.01); 两组麻醉时间、拔管时间、术后睁眼时间、自主呼吸恢复时间比较,均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。④两组患者术后并发症发生率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:靶控输注丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼在胆囊切除术患者中具有麻醉效果明显和苏醒质量良好等优势。
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the effects of target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil on hemodynamics and postoperative cognitive level in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.Methods:86 patients treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected and divided into control group(intravenous infusion of propofol and fentanyl)and experimental group(target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil),43 cases in each group.The perioperative heart rate,blood pressure,NRS score,OAAS score,MMSE score,postoperative recovery and postoperative complications were compared.Results:Compared with the level before intubation,the heart rate and diastolic blood pressure of the two groups after intubation were significantly increased(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the levels of heart rate and blood pressure between the two groups before and after intubation(P>0.05).The NRS scores at 24 hours after extubation in the two groups were lower than those at extubation,the OAAS score in the control group was higher than that at extubation,and the OAAS and MMSE scores in the experimental group were higher than those at extubation(P<0.05).The NRS score at 24 hours after extubation in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group,and the MMSE score was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Compared with the control group,the complete recovery time of orientation in the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group(P<0.01).There was no significant difference in anesthesia time,extubation time,postoperative eye opening time and spontaneous breathing recovery time between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in patients treated with cholecystectomy has obvious anesthetic effect and good quality of recovery and other advantages.

参考文献/References:

[1] Grape S,Kirkham KR,Frauenknecht J,et al.Intra-operative analgesia with remifentanil vs.dexmedetomidine:a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis[J].Anaesthesia,2019,74(6):793-800.
[2] Wang C,Li L,Xu H,et al.Effect of desflurane-remifentanil or sevoflurane-remifentanil on early recovery in elderly patients:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Pharmazie,2019,74(4):201-205.
[3] Bevans WTS,Clegg DO,Sakata DJ,et al.Remifentanil stability[J].Anesth Analg,2018,127(3):51-52.
[4] 田芳芳,颜西刚,陈 燕,等.右美托咪定与丙泊酚对椎管内麻醉手术患者NE、COR、TV水平的影响[J].河北医药,2020,42(7):1065-1067,1071.
[5] Lee HC,Ryu HG,Chung EJ,et al.Prediction of bispectral index during target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil:A deep learning approach[J].Anesthesiology,2018,128(3):492-501.
[6] Wikstrom L,Nilsson M,Brostrom A,et al.Patients self-reported nausea:validation of the numerical rating scale and of a daily summary of repeated numerical rating scale scores[J].J Clin Nurs,2019,28(5-6):959-968.
[7] Kim TK,Niklewski PJ,Martin JF,et al.Enhancing a sedation score to include truly noxious stimulation:the Extended Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation(EOAA/S)[J].Br J Anaesth,2015,115(4):569-577.
[8] Larner AJ.Mini-mental state examination:diagnostic test accuracy study in primary care referrals[J].Neurodegener Dis Manag,2018,8(5):301-305.
[9] Sridharan K,Sivaramakrishnan G.Comparison of fentanyl,remifentanil,sufentanil and alfentanil in combination with propofol for general anesthesia:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Curr Clin Pharmacol,2019,14(2):116-124.
[10] Meijer FS,Martini CH,Broens S,et al.Nociception-guided versus standard care during remifentanil-propofol anesthesia:A randomized controlled trial[J].Anesthesiology,2019,130(5):745-755.
[11] 田 道,张盘石,刘艳霞,等.不同剂量瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚靶控输注对老年全麻患者应激反应和血流动力学的影响研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(7):827-829,870.
[12] 严 明,周 薇,李祖阁,等.七氟烷复合瑞芬太尼对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者应激、血流动力学和认知功能影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2018,47(9):1181-1184.
[13] You AH,Kim JY,Kim DH,et al.Effect of remifentanil and midazolam on ED95 of propofol for loss of consciousness in elderly patients:a randomized,clinical trial[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2019,98(16):e15132.
[14] Fuentes R,Cortínez LI,Contreras V,et al.Propofol pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile and its electroencephalographic interaction with remifentanil in children[J].Paediatr Anaesth,2018,28(12):1078-1086.
[15] 蒋艳东,赵素敏.瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚麻醉对腹腔镜胆囊切除术病人应激反应、血气指标的影响[J].海南医学院学报,2016,22(7):677.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨 勇,金 雷△.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中不同气腹压力与并发症的关系研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):169.
　YANG Yong,JIN Lei..Relationship between different pneumoperitoneum pressure and complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].,2019,(11):169.
[2]蒋忠洋,孙 欢,马世伟,等.右美托咪啶联合瑞芬太尼在ICU患者镇痛镇静中的应用观察*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(3):341.
　JIANG Zhongyang,SUN Huan,MA Shiwei,et al.Application of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil in analgesia and sedation of ICU patients[J].,2020,49(11):341.
[3]韩 彬,颜 飞,严 军.腹横肌平面阻滞对妇科开腹手术患者全身麻醉后早期恢复的临床研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(10):1256.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.10.019]
　HAN Bin,YAN Fei,YAN Jun.Effect of transverse abdominal plane block on early recovery after general anesthesia in patients undergoing gynecological laparotomy[J].,2022,51(11):1256.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.10.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*国家自然科学基金资助面上项目(31570845)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-11-05