[1]王业勤,刘桂清△.急性心肌梗死冠脉造影血管开通后即刻与延迟放置支架对预后的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(4):477-480.
　WANG Yeqin,LIU Guiqing..Effect of immediate stent and delayed stent on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction after coronary angiography opening[J].,2020,49(4):477-480.
点击复制

急性心肌梗死冠脉造影血管开通后即刻与延迟放置支架对预后的影响

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
49
期数:
2020年4期
页码:
477-480
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-04-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of immediate stent and delayed stent on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction after coronary angiography opening
文章编号:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2020.04.023
作者:
王业勤1; 刘桂清2△
1.锦州医科大学齐齐哈尔医学院附属第一医院研究生基地内科(齐齐哈尔 161000); 2.齐齐哈尔医学院附属第一医院心内科(齐齐哈尔161000)
Author(s):
WANG Yeqin; LIU Guiqing.
Department of Internal Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University(Qiqihar 161000)
关键词:
急性心肌梗死;  冠脉造影血管;  即刻支架;  延迟支架;  预后效果
Keywords:
Acute myocardial infarction;  Coronary angiography;  Immediate stent;  Delayed stent;  Prognosis effect
分类号:
R541.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:研究对比急性心肌梗死(AMI)冠脉造影血管开通后即刻支架与延迟支架的效果及对预后的影响。方法:纳入AMI患者82例进行研究。将其按照信封法随机等分成延迟组和即刻组。两组均通过经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)或(和)血栓抽吸开通血管,即刻组血管开通后即刻置入支架,延迟组则未立即植入支架,而是在7～14 d复查冠脉造影后,按照病变血管狭窄程度决定是否置入支架。比较两组术后心肌灌注情况,PCI情况,术后主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生情况,治疗后左心功能指标变化情况,治疗前后血清甲状腺球蛋白(TG)、甲状腺球蛋白抗体(TGAb)水平。结果:延迟组术后TIMI3级血流、MBG≥2级人数占比相较于即刻组均显著更高,而无复流人数占比相较于即刻组明显更低(P均<0.05)。延迟组支架直径相较于即刻组明显更大,而支架长度相较于即刻组明显更短(P均<0.05)。延迟组术后院内及术后6个月MACE发生率相较于即刻组均显著更低(P均<0.05)。术后6个月延迟组左室射血分数(LVEF)显著高于即刻组,而左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)显著低于即刻组(P均<0.05)。治疗后延迟组血清TG、TGAb水平相较于即刻组均明显较低(P均<0.05)。结论:AMI冠脉造影血管开通后延迟支架相较于即刻支架的效果更佳,有利于改善患者心肌灌注状况,促进心功能的恢复,且有效改善患者的甲状腺功能,预后效果更为理想。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the effect of immediate stent and delayed stent in acute myoardial infarction(AMI)after coronary angiography,and to analyze the effect on prognosis. Methods:82 patients with AMI were included in the study,and randomly divided into delayed group and immediate group according to envelope method. Both groups underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)or(and)thrombus aspiration and revascularization. In the immediate group,the stent was placed immediately after revascularization. In the delayed group,the stent was not implanted immediately,but the decision was made whether to place the stent according to the degree of stenosis of the diseased blood vessels after the coronary angiography on 7 to 14 days after revascularization. The postoperative myocardial perfusion,PCI,postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE),changes in left ventricular function indexes after treatment,the levels of serum thyroglobulin(TG)and thyroglobulin antibody(TGAb)before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results:The proportion of TIMI3 blood flow and MBG≥2 patients in the delayed group was significantly higher than that in the immediate group,while the proportion of non-reflow patients was significantly lower than that in the immediate group(all P<0.05). The diameter of the sent in the delayed group was significantly larger than that in the immediate group,while the length of the stent in the delayed group was significantly shorter than that in the immediate group(all P<0.05). The incidence of MACE in the delayed group in the hospital and 6 months after operation was significantly lower than that in the immediate group(all P<0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)was significantly higher in the delayed group 6 months after operation than that in the immediate group,while the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD)was significantly lower than that in the immediate group(all P<0.05). After treatment,serum TG and TGAb levels in the delayed group were significantly lower than those in the immediate group(all P<0.05). Conclusion:After AMI coronary angiography,the delayed stent is more effective than the immediate stent,which is conducive to improve the myocardial perfusion status,promote the recovery of cardiac function,and effectively improve the thyroid function of patients,with better prognosis.

参考文献/References:

[1] Koowattanatianchai S,Chantadansuwan T,Kaladee A,et al.practical risk stratification score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J].Cardiol Res,2019,10(6):350-357.
[2] Qian D,Zhou D,Liu H,et al.Therapeutic effects of percutaneous coronary intervention on acutemyocardial infarction complicated with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome[J].Pak J Med Sci,2019,35(6):1701-1706.
[3] 刘睿方,徐方兴,刘同库.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的支架植入时机研究[J].中国全科医学,2017,20(4):432-436.
[4] 曹佳齐,丁跃有,郑宏超.不同经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术支架植入时机对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死疗效和预后的影响[J].临床内科杂志,2018,35(12):821-824.
[5] 王 圣,孙翠芳,吴钟伟,等.急性心肌梗死患者PCI术中血栓事件相关危险因素及转归分析[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2018,26(9):913-919.
[6] 郭 超,许浩博,段 欣,等.左主干病变导致急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的近期预后[J].中华心血管病杂志,2019,47(4):278-283.
[7] 魏立业,夏 岳,戚国庆,等.尼可地尔对行择期PCI治疗的NSTEMI患者心肌灌注水平的影响[J].中国急救医学,2017,37(9):800-802.
[8] Lim S,Choo EH,Choi IJ,et al.angiotensin receptor blockers as an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J].J Korean Med Sci,2019,34(4)5:289-291.
[9] Ide Y,Horie T,Saito N,et al.Cardioprotective effects of vcp modulator kus121 in murine and porcine models of myocardial infarction[J].JACC Basic Transl Sci,2019,4(6):701-714.
[10] 马东明,叶世权,范忠才.延期支架在高血栓负荷的急性心肌梗死中的应用[J].重庆医学,2019,48(3):503-505.
[11] 刘海成,杨海燕.急性心肌梗死患者PCI高血栓负荷及未完全机化血栓处理分析[J].中国急救医学,2017,37(z2):26-27.
[12] 黄 靖,鲁玉明.老年急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者不同时机行经皮冠状动脉介入支架植入及心血管不良事件对比[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(1):61-63.
[13] 张 鹏,解 强,程 颖,等.血栓抽吸及替罗非班预处理罪犯血管后延迟支架植入术治疗急性心肌梗死30例[J].医药导报,2015,34(12):1606-1609.
[14] 杨模国,罗建平.提前应用国产替罗非班对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者急诊介入治疗疗效的影响[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2008,8:47.
[15] 安佰富,张广成,张雪莲,等.高血栓负荷的急性心肌梗死患者开通罪犯血管后延迟支架置入的临床效果[J].中国老年学杂志,2017,37(20):5031-5032.

相似文献/References:

[1]雷晓敏,曹 蕊△.冠状动脉内注射硝普钠对行经皮冠状动脉介入术〖JZ〗急性心肌梗死患者心血管事件及左室功能的影响研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(10):1323.
[2]朱志坚,孙丽芳,陆志刚 .外周血中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对急性心肌梗死患者预后的预测价值[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(10):1326.
　ZHU Zhijian,SUN Lifang,LU Zhigang..Prognostic value of peripheral blood neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for 〖JZ〗longterm prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].,2019,(4):1326.
[3]王 颖,白 琳,张 洁,等.抑制炎性细胞因子与类风湿关节炎合并急性心肌梗死患者颈动脉斑块相关性研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(12):1679.
[4]贾凯侠,夏旭东△,田 心.体外反搏治疗急性心肌梗死临床疗效及对患者尿微量白蛋白影响研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(1):90.
[5]赵 博,王银谦,王红燕.巨噬细胞移动抑制因子与冠心病关系Meta分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(1):125.
[6]翟向伟,高宏勇△,王燕妮,等.冻干重组人脑利钠肽联合替罗非班对急性心肌梗死患者趋化素、半凝乳素-3水平的影响*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(8):995.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.08.021]
　ZHAI Xiangwei,GAO Hongyong,WANG Yanni,et al.Effect of lyophilized recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide combined with tirofiban on the levels of chemorin and Gal-3 in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].,2020,49(4):995.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.08.021]
[7]赵 莉,李 智.达格列净干预对急性心肌梗死合并2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后心室重构、心肌微灌注的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(1):81.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.01.021]
[8]刘 放,谈 红,晋 群,等.阿托伐他汀改善急性心肌梗死后左室收缩功能实验研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(10):1196.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.10.005]
　LIU Fang,TAN Hong,JIN Qun,et al.Mechanism of atorvastatin improving the left ventricular systolic function after acute myocardial infarction in rabbits[J].,2022,51(4):1196.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.10.005]
[9]峁 存,曾新春.急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入术治疗前后血清内皮细胞钙黏蛋白水平、血管生成素-2水平与预后相关性分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(10):1219.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.10.010]
　MAO Cun,ZENG Xinchun.Correlation between serum levels of VE-Cad,Ang-2 before and after PCI and prognosis of AMI patients[J].,2022,51(4):1219.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.10.010]
[10]李雪梅,南武娟.缺氧诱导因子-1α、Notch1和Jagged1共转染对急性心肌梗死模型大鼠心功能的改善作用[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(11):1346.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.11.006]
　LI Xuemei,NAN Wujuan.Improvement of co-transfection of hypoxia inducible factor-1 α,Notch1 and Jagged1 on cardiac function in rats with acute myocardial infarction[J].,2022,51(4):1346.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.11.006]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-13