[1]韩生禄,刘海莲△,付德来,等.不同入路腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗早期肾癌临床对比研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(1):33-36.
 HAN Shenglu,LIU Hailian,FU Delai,et al.Clinical study of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for different treatments of early renal cell carcinoma[J].,2020,49(1):33-36.
点击复制

不同入路腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗早期肾癌临床对比研究*
分享到:

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
49
期数:
2020年1期
页码:
33-36
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-01-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical study of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for different treatments of early renal cell carcinoma
文章编号:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2020.01.009
作者:
韩生禄1刘海莲2△付德来3赵留存1杨 勇1 杨京可1周克斌1董小鑫1
1.西安市第九医院泌尿外科(西安 710054);2.西安市工会医院儿科(西安710100);3.西安交通大学第二附属医院泌尿外科(西安710004)
Author(s):
HAN ShengluLIU HailianFU Delaiet al.
Department of Urinary Surgery,Xi’an No.9 Hospital(Xi’an 710054)
关键词:
肾癌手术疗法肾部分切除手术入路效果安全性
Keywords:
Key words Kidney cancerSurgical therapyPartial nephrectomySurgical approachEffectSafety
分类号:
R737.11
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的:探讨腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗早期肾癌时后腹腔入路和经腹腔入路两种入路的有效性和安全性。方法:采用随机抽签方式将40例早期肾癌(T1N0M0) 患者均分为后腹腔组和经腹腔组(各20例)。两组患者均接受腹腔镜下肾部分切术进行肾癌治疗,其中后腹腔组手术入路选择经后腹腔,经腹组手术入路选择经腹腔。比较两组术中热缺血时间、失血量、术后时间、肿瘤重量、术后饮食恢复时间、住院时间及围手术期并发症发生情况;测定两组血清应激反应指标白细胞计数(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和皮质醇表达水平;统计两组术中切缘冷冻切片病理学检查及随访结果。结果:两组肿瘤患者均顺利完成肾部分切除手术。围手术期,后腹腔组和经腹腔组患者热缺血时间、术中失血量、肿瘤重量及并发症发生率情况间比较差异无统计学意义(P>005);但后腹腔组手术时间、术后饮食恢复时间和住院时间明显短于经腹腔组,WBC、CRP、皮质醇表达水平明显低于经腹腔组(P<005)。两组肾癌患者术中切缘组织冷冻切片均为阴性,术后随访,后腹腔组仅1例复发,经腹腔组无复发病例,两组复发率间比较差异无统计学意义(P>005)。结论:直径≤4 cm的早期肾癌患者腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗中,后腹腔入路和经腹腔入路均具有良好有效性和安全性,但经后腹腔入路手术时间短,机体应激刺激小,患者术后康复快。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the treatment of early renal cell carcinoma with posterior abdominal approach and transperitoneal approach.Methods:Forty patients with early renal cell carcinoma(T1N0M0) included in the study were randomly divided into the posterior abdominal group and the abdominal cavity group(20 cases in each group).Both groups underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.In the choice of approach,the posterior abdominal group was selected through the posterior abdominal cavity,and the abdominal cavity group was selected through the abdominal cavity.The duration of warm ischemia,blood loss,postoperative time,tumor weight,postoperative dietary recovery time,hospitalization time and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups.The serum stress response indicators of white blood cell count(WBC),Creactive protein(CRP) and cortisol levels were measured.The pathological examination and followup results of frozen margin sections of the two groups were performed.Results:Both groups of tumor patients successfully completed partial nephrectomy.There was no significant difference in the time of warm ischemia,intraoperative blood loss,tumor weight and complication rate between the posterior abdominal group and the abdominal cavity group(P>005).However,the operation time,postoperative dietary recovery time and hospitalization time of the posterior abdominal group were significantly shorter than those of the abdominal cavity group,the expression levels of WBC,CRP and cortisol in the posterior abdominal group were significantly lower than those in the abdominal cavity group(P<005).In the two groups of patients with renal cell carcinoma,the frozen section of the marginal tissue was negative.There was only one case of recurrence in the posterior abdominal group,and there was no recurrence in the abdominal cavity group,and the difference in recurrence rate between the two groups was infini〖LM〗te(P>005).Conclusion:Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with early renal cell carcinoma(the diameter≤4 cm )has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of posterior abdominal approach and transabdominal approach,but patients with postabdominal approach have shorter operation time,the body’s stress stimulation is small,and the patient recovers quickly.

参考文献/References:

[1] Rossi SH,Klatte T,UsherSmith J,et al.Epidemiology and screening for renal cancer[J].World Journal of Urology,2018,36(9):13411353.
[2] Lee WEC,Anil K.Epidemiology of prostate and kidney cancer in the aboriginal population of anada:a systematic review[J].Canadian Urological Association Journal,2017,11(5):222232.
[3] Michalek IM,Martinsen JI,Weiderpass E,et al.Occupation and risk of kidney cancer in nordic countries[J].Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine,2019,61(1):4146.
[4] 杨立洲.后腹腔镜肾癌根治术与开放式肾癌根治术的临床效果对比[D].郑州:郑州大学,2016.
[5] Xia Z,Chen W,Yao R,et al.Laparoscopic assisted low anterior resection for advanced rectal cancer in a kidney transplant recipient[J].Medicine,2016,95(44):51985203.
[6] 张桂英,陈小春.胃间质瘤腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗对比研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2015,30(6):917918,921.
[7] 宋丰杰,刘文杰,刘凌玉,等.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期宫颈癌的疗效及患者术后生活质量的比较[J].实用癌症杂志,2015,30(3):371373.
[8] Makhoul B,DeLT AD,Salomon L,et al.Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 renal cancer:the gold standard? A comparison of laparoscopic vs open nephrectomy.[J].Bju International,2015,93(1):6770.
[9] 黄 超,成泽民,杜义堂,等.大体积肾癌微创手术患者的入路方案研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2015,21(8):857860.
[10] 周青英,黄达飞,郑定钦.经腹入路与后腹腔入路腹腔镜超声辅助的肾部分切除术治疗中央型肾癌的临床比较[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(3):215219.
[11] 宁忠运,丁 辉,包军胜,等.经腹腹腔镜和后腹腔镜与开放性肾癌根治手术的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2017,32(5):2731.
[12] 张 威.后腹腔镜肾部分切除术和开放肾部分切除术治疗肾癌比较研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(7):817819.
[13] Godoy G,Ramanathan V,Kanofsky JA,et al.Effect of warm ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy on early postoperative glomerular filtration rate[J].The Journal of Urology,2009,181(6):24382445.
[14] 赵 军,杨建华,余 忠.不同入路行腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗肾癌的有效性和安全性分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2017,16(12):6770.
[15] 黄仁胜.不同入路腹腔镜手术治疗大体积肾癌的临床疗效和安全性分析[J].广西医学,2018,40(8):5558.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘 明,常红侠△.右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜下腹股沟〖JZ〗斜疝高位结扎术患儿血流动力学及麻醉质量的影响研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(10):1268.
 LIU Ming,CHANG Hongxia..Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine on the transverse hemifacial plane block on〖JZ〗hemodynamics and anesthesia quality in children undergoing high ligation of inguinal hernia[J].,2019,(1):1268.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*西安市卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(201508)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-17