[1]裴晓娟,吴高平△.超声引导神经阻滞联合全身麻醉在胫骨骨折手术中的麻醉效果及对患者应激反应的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(11):1477-1480.
 PEI Xiaojuan,WU Gaoping.Effect of ultrasound guided nerve block combined with general anaesthesia on tibial fracture patients and its effect on stress response[J].,2019,(11):1477-1480.
点击复制

超声引导神经阻滞联合全身麻醉在胫骨骨折手术中的麻醉效果及对患者应激反应的影响
分享到:

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年11期
页码:
1477-1480
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of ultrasound guided nerve block combined with general anaesthesia on tibial fracture patients and its effect on stress response
文章编号:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2019.11.019
作者:
裴晓娟1吴高平2△
1陕西中医药大学第二附属医院麻醉科(咸阳712000);2西安汉城妇产医院麻醉科(西安710018)
Author(s):
PEI XiaojuanWU Gaoping
Department of Anesthesiology,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Xianyang 712000)
关键词:
超声引导神经阻滞全身麻醉胫骨骨折麻醉效果应激反应并发症
Keywords:
Key words Ultrasound guided nerve blockGeneral anesthesiaTibial fracturesAnesthetic effectStress responseComplication
分类号:
R6144
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的:探讨超声引导神经阻滞联合全身麻醉在胫骨骨折患者手术中的麻醉效果及对应激反应的影响。方法:胫骨骨折患者150例,随机分为观察组(n=75)与对照组(n=75),观察组采用超声引导神经阻滞联合全身麻醉,对照组单纯全身麻醉,对比两组麻醉效果及应激反应指标。结果:观察组拔管后10 min的Ramsay镇静评分为(239±018)分,明显优于对照组的(192±023)分,拔管后30 min的疼痛(VAS)评分为(185±075)分,明显低于对照组的(408±069)分(P<005)。观察组唤醒时间(790±213)min、拔管时间(1038±262)min均早于对照组的(1353±319)min、(1755±382)min(P<005)。观察组与对照组T0时刻的血浆血糖(GLU)、白介素6(IL6)、皮质醇(COR)对比差异无统计学意义(P>005);观察组与对照组T1~T4时刻的GLU、IL6、COR均明显升高,但观察组GLU、IL6、COR水平均明显较对照组低(P<005)。观察组术后并发症发生率(267%)明显低于对照组(1467%)(P<005)。结论:相比于单纯全身麻醉,超声引导神经阻滞与全身麻醉联合应用的麻醉效果更加显著,且减轻手术应激反应。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective:To investigate the anesthetic effect of ultrasound guided nerve block combined with general anesthesia in patients with tibial fracture and its effect on stress responseMethods:150 cases of tibial fracture admitted were selected,they were randomly divided into observation group (n=75) and control group (n=75).The observation group was performed by ultrasound guided nerve block combined with general anesthesia,and the control group was given general anesthesia.The anesthetic effect and the stress response index of the two groups were comparedResults:10 minutes after extubation,the Ramsay score in the observation group (239±018) was significantly better than that in the control group (192±023),and 30 minutes after extubation the VAS score in the observation group (185±075) was significantly lower than that in the control group (408±069) (P<005).The wakeup time in the observation group (790±213) min and the extubation time (1038±262) min were earlier than those in the control group (1353±319) min and (1755±382) min(P<005).At T0,plasma glucose (GLU),interleukin6 (IL6) and cortisol (COR) were compared between the observation group and the control group,and the difference was not statistically significant (P>005).At time T1~T4,GLU,IL6 and COR were significantly increased in the observation group and the control group,but they were significantly lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P<005).Postoperative complications (267%) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (1467%)(P<005)Conclusion:Compared with general anesthesia,ultrasound guided nerve block combined with general anesthesia is more effective and relieves surgical stress response

参考文献/References:

[1] 任 敬,窦榆生,廖永华,等MIPPO与切开复位内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折疗效比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2014,65(5):468470.
[2] 马 宇,苏佳灿,陈建芳,等区域神经阻滞技术在创伤胫腓骨骨折患者麻醉中的应用[J].第二军医大学学报,2016,37(11):14061409.
[3] 柏 青,莫 涛,张奉超超声引导股神经阻滞复合全身麻醉在小儿股骨干骨折手术中的应用研究[J].山西医药杂志,2017,46(20):24692471.
[4] 康定坤,赵丽艳,张 卫,等.超声引导下腰丛神经阻滞应用于高龄患者股骨转子间骨折手术的临床效果[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2015,36(8):704707.
[5] Liu JL,Yuan WX,Wang XL,et al. Peripheral nerve blocks versus general anesthesia for total knee replacement in elderly patients on the postoperative quality of recovery[J]. Clinical Interventions in Aging,2014,9(default):341350.
[6] 王远彬,刘盼盼,文丽君,等超声引导股神经联合股外侧皮神经阻滞复合喉罩七氟烷浅全身麻酔用于高龄患者股骨粗隆骨折手术[J].中国现代医学杂志,2017,27(5):130134.
[7] 陆小龙,梅 斌,陈士寿,等超声引导下腰骶丛神经阻滞联合全麻在高龄患者髋关节置换术的临床应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2016,32(3):237240.
[8] 姚 滢,蒋 平,岑 奕,等不同水平坐骨神经股神经联合阻滞与连续硬脊膜外腔阻滞麻醉用于胫腓骨骨折手术麻醉效果的比较[J].上海医学,2016,58(12):711714.
[9] Kang C,Kim SB,Heo YM,et al.comparison of time to operation and efficacies of ultrasoundguided nerve block and general anesthesia in emergency external fixation of a lower leg fractures (AO 42,43,44)[J]. Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery,2017,56(5):10191024.
[10] 李圣君.超声引导下舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因行坐骨神经阻滞的麻醉效果[J]. 海南医学,2017,28(18):29912994.
[11] 郑兰兰,王 仿,吴献伟,等.喉罩全麻联合超声引导下神经阻滞在老年患者下肢骨折手术中的应用[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2017,46(2):214215.
[12] 楼 洁,陈彩艳,沈文生.超声引导下神经阻滞联合全身麻醉在下肢骨折手术中的应用[J]. 医学研究杂志,2017,46(3):174177.
[13] Lee GS,Kang C,Won Y,et al.Comparison of time to operation and efficacies of ultrasoundguided nerve block and general anesthesia in emergency external fixation of lower leg fractures[J]. Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery,2017,56(5):10191024.
[14] 张云慧,顾新宇,刘清仁,等.超声引导神经阻滞复合全身麻醉在胫骨骨折手术中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志,2015,31(3):228230.
[15] 王 敏,谢林碧,黄伟文,等.外周神经阻滞与腰硬联合麻醉对老年高血压患者下肢手术应激反应的影响[J]. 中国药房,2016,75(2):228230.
[16] 赵 赢,冯树全,邵安民.地塞米松复合舒芬太尼对超声引导下罗哌卡因下肢神经阻滞效应的影响[J]. 广西医科大学学报,2017,34(11):16491652

相似文献/References:

[1]李国艳,欧 珊.全麻诱导不同通气方式对胃胀气的影响*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):230.
 LI Guoyan,OU Shan..Ultrasound assessment on gastric insufflation by different general anesthesia induction methods[J].,2019,(11):230.
[2]刘 瑶,吴赞情△,董补怀.不同气管导管套囊压力对腹腔镜胆囊切除术全身麻醉患者拔管时心血管反应的影响*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(8):987.
 LIU Yao,WU Zanqing,DONG Buhuai..Effects of different endotracheal tube cuff pressure on cardiovascular response during endotracheal extubation of general anesthesia[J].,2019,(11):987.
[3]李玲霞,高东梅,胡 彬,等.校正体重与学龄期肥胖患儿全麻机械通气潮气量相关性研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(9):1138.
 LI Lingxia,GAO Dongmei,HU Bin,et al.Adjustment for correlation between body weight and tide volume 〖JZ〗of mechanical ventilation in children with schoolage obesity[J].,2019,(11):1138.
[4]王永徽,路志红,刘广林△,等.肌松程度和拮抗对经颅电刺激运动诱发电位的影响研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(12):1584.
 WANG Yonghui,LU Zhihong,LIU Guanglin,et al.Effect of neuromuscular blockade and reversal on transcranial motorevoked potentials[J].,2019,(11):1584.
[5]周 园,陈 琦.全身麻醉对大鼠学习记忆能力及脑额叶、海马和杏仁核半胱氨酸蛋白酶-3基因表达的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(2):139.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.02.003]
 ZHOU Yuan,CHEN Qi.Effects of general anesthesia on learning and memory ability and Caspase-3 gene expression in frontal lobe,hippocampus and amygdale of rats[J].,2021,50(11):139.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.02.003]
[6]刘林芝,黎 伟.全麻复合硬膜外麻醉对前列腺癌患者术中肌松剂使用量及应激反应的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2023,52(4):441.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.04.017]
 LIU Linzhi,LI Wei.Effect of general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia on dosage of muscle relaxant and stress response in patients with prostate cancer during operation[J].,2023,52(11):441.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.04.017]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-15