[1]龙晓东,李爱国△,刘之彝,等.早期介入栓塞治疗脑动脉瘤破裂疗效及安全性研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(8):1000-1002.
 LONG Xiaodong,LI Aiguo,LIU Zhiyi,et al.Efficacy and safety of early interventional embolization for cerebral aneurysm rupture[J].,2019,(8):1000-1002.
点击复制

早期介入栓塞治疗脑动脉瘤破裂疗效及安全性研究*
分享到:

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年8期
页码:
1000-1002
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy and safety of early interventional embolization for cerebral aneurysm rupture
文章编号:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2019.08.011
作者:
龙晓东李爱国△刘之彝杨与敏
四川省德阳市人民医院神经外科(德阳618000)
Author(s):
LONG Xiaodong LI Aiguo LIU Zhiyi et al.
Department of Neurosurgery, Deyang People’s Hospital, Sichuan Province(Deyang 618000)
关键词:
脑动脉瘤破裂治疗介入栓塞术早期微弹簧圈介入安全性临床疗效
Keywords:
Key words Cerebral aneurysm ruptureTherapyInterventional embolization Early stageMicro coil interventionSafetyClinical efficacy
分类号:
R742.9
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的:观察脑动脉瘤破裂患者早期行介入栓塞术治疗的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选取脑动脉瘤破裂患者120例,均行微弹簧圈介入栓塞治疗,根据患者入院治疗时间的不同,将入院3 d内治疗的72例纳入观察组,将入院3 d后治疗的48例纳入对照组,记录两组患者术后恢复情况,对比两组临床疗效和术后并发症发生情况,并随访观察患者预后情况。结果:观察组术后自主呼吸恢复时间、定向力恢复时间和睁眼时间均较对照组显著缩短(P<0.05);观察组术后完全栓塞率为90.28%,显著高于对照组的52.08%(P<0.05);与对照组相比,观察组术后合并脑血管痉挛、动脉瘤再次破裂、脑积水以及蛛网膜下腔出血发生率均显著降低(P<0.05),且复发率也显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后6个月的MBI评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05),mRS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:对于脑动脉瘤破裂患者,早期介入栓塞治疗效果显著,可缩短患者术后恢复时间,且术后并发症少,预后好。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of early interventional embolization in patients with cerebral aneurysm rupture.Methods:120 patients with cerebral aneurysm rupture who were admitted to were enrolled.All patients underwent micro-coil embolization. According to the time of admission, the 72 patients who were admitted to the hospital within 3 days were included in the observation. In the group, 48 patients who were treated after 3 days of admission were included in the control group.The postoperative recovery of the patients was recorded. The clinical efficacy and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared, and the prognosis of the patients was followed up.Results: The postoperative spontaneous breathing recovery time, orientation recovery time and blink time were significantly shorter in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05).The complete embolization rate of the observation group was 90.28%,which was significantly higher than that of the control group was 52.08%(P<0.05).Compared with the control group, the incidence of cerebral vasospasm, re-rupture of aneurysm, hydrocephalus and subarachnoid hemorrhage were significantly lower in the observation group (P<0.05), and the recurrence rate was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05);the MBI score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group at 6 months after operation (P<0.05), and the mRS score was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion: For patients with cerebral aneurysm rupture, early interventional embolization has a significant effect, which can shorten the postoperative recovery time, and has fewer postoperative complications and a good prognosis.

参考文献/References:

[1] 洪德全,黄海鹰,杨 华,等.介入栓塞术与开颅夹闭术治疗颅内动脉瘤的疗效对比[J].中国现代医生,2018,56(34):79-82,87.
[2] 黄春波,杨瑞生,黄亚楠,等.微创血管内介入栓塞术治疗颅脑动脉瘤临床研究[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2018,21(18):2054-2062.
[3] 郑莹莹,郑贝贝,杨 钰.血管内介入栓塞术对颅内动脉瘤患者术后康复及感染发生率的影响[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2018,33(5):582-584.
[4] 徐 建,刘佰运.显微手术夹闭与血管内介入栓塞术治疗大脑中动脉动脉瘤破裂的临床疗效及安全性评价[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2018,17(16):1751-1754.
[5] 彭 华.血管介入栓塞术治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂蛛网膜下腔出血的临床研究[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2018,31(1):43-46.
[6] 何国军,杜亚辉,李旭东.血管内介入栓塞治疗老年脑动脉瘤的手术效果及对Glasgow预后评分的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2018,38(1):113-115.
[7] 王 宁.血管内介入栓塞术与开颅术治疗脑动脉瘤对比观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2018,47(1):56-58.
[8] 曾 庆,周国平,曾宪强,等.介入栓塞术与开颅夹闭术治疗颅内动脉瘤对照研究[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2017,20(21):75-79.
[9] 张明宇,李欣欣,周 杨.血管内介入栓塞术与开颅夹闭术治疗脑动脉瘤的效果[J].中医临床研究,2017,9(9):117-118.
[10] 梁世行,刘成辉,陈 旭,等.血管内介入栓塞术治疗不同情况大脑中动脉动脉瘤的疗效[J].新医学,2017,48(3):173-177.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐 博,苏军涛,钟 烨,等.外源性Apelin13对重症急性胰腺炎大鼠治疗作用及其机制研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):148.
 XU Bo,SU Juntao,ZHONG Ye,et al.Effect and mechanism of exogenous apelin13 on severe acute pancreatitis in rats[J].,2019,(8):148.
[2]陈保春,刘利峰.铥激光与等离子电切术治疗膀胱癌疗效对比研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):159.
 CHEN Baochun,LIU Lifeng..Comparative study of thulium laser and plasma electroresection in resection of bladder tumor[J].,2019,(8):159.
[3]张玉亮,朱 宏,戴洪山△.B超引导经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术在胆源性胰腺炎治疗中的临床意义[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):166.
 ZHANG Yuliang,ZHU Hong,DAI Hongshan..Clinical significance of Bmode ultrasound guided percutaneous transhepatic  gallbladder puncture and drainage in the treatment of biliary pancreatitis[J].,2019,(8):166.
[4]徐建庆,买赛虎△,杨喜佳,等.腹腔镜手术治疗复杂性胆囊炎临床疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):176.
 XU Jianqing,MAI Saihu,YANG Xijia,et al.Analysis of curative effect in laparoscopic surgery for complicated cholecystitis[J].,2019,(8):176.
[5]刘 侃,杨栓元,刘旭晨,等.PPH术治疗III、IV度痔中长期疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):183.
 LIU Kan,YANG Shuanyuan,LIU Xucheng,et al.Curative effect of PPH for III and IV hemorrhoids[J].,2019,(8):183.
[6]石 丹,张会久,周达岸.闭合复位经皮空心螺钉内固定与切开复位内固定治疗踝关节骨折疗效对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):186.
 SHI Dan,ZHANG Huijiu,ZHOU Daan..Comparison of closed reduction, percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and open reduction  and internal fixation for ankle fractures[J].,2019,(8):186.
[7]肖东波.不保留小关节植骨床PLIF术治疗老年脊柱退行性疾病价值研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):189.
 XIAO Dongbo..The value of nonreserving small arthroplasty bone PLIF for senile spinal degenerative diseases[J].,2019,(8):189.
[8]高清滢,侯洁心△.高频电波刀宫颈电环切除术治疗中重度宫颈柱状上皮异位临床疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):223.
 GAO Qingying,HOU Jiexin..Observation on the clinical effect of high frequency electric wave knife cervix electroloop resection in the〖JP〗 〖JP4〗treatment of moderate and severe Cervical columnar epithelium ectopicdiagnosed by pathological examination[J].,2019,(8):223.
[9]宋 婷,罗 莉,贾 菲,等.1540 nm非剥脱性点阵激光联合水凝胶医用冷敷贴治疗 凹陷性痤疮瘢痕疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):241.
 SONG Ting,LUO Li,JIA Fei,et al.Effiicacy of nonablative 1540nm fractional laser with medical cool patch in the treatment of acne sca[J].,2019,(8):241.
[10]张 彦,陈 龙.胃镜下肾上腺素与凝血酶联合治疗消化性溃疡合并出血疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):259.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*四川省德阳市科技支撑计划项目(2015SZ021)
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-13