[1]李国艳,欧 珊.全麻诱导不同通气方式对胃胀气的影响*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):230-232.
　LI Guoyan,OU Shan..Ultrasound assessment on gastric insufflation by different general anesthesia induction methods[J].,2019,(2):230-232.
点击复制

全麻诱导不同通气方式对胃胀气的影响*
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年2期
页码:
230-232
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Ultrasound assessment on gastric insufflation by different general anesthesia induction methods
文章编号:
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2019.02.025
作者:
李国艳; 欧 珊
成都市中西医结合医院麻醉科（成都610041）
Author(s):
LI Guoyan;  OU Shan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital（Chengdu 610041）
关键词:
全身麻醉; 肠胃胀气; 超声检查; 通气方式; 气道压力; 呼吸参数
Keywords:
Key words 〖JP3〗General anesthesia; Flatulence; Ultrasonography; Ventilation; Airway pressure; Breathing parameters
分类号:
R614.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的：探讨全麻诱导时不同气道压力、呼吸频率下控制性通气对胃胀气的影响。方法：选择40例择期全麻患者随机分为15 cmH2O压力组(P15组)和10 cmH2O压力组（P10组）。全麻诱导依次静脉给予丙泊酚,舒芬太尼，顺式阿曲库铵，1 min后双手托下颌面罩加压用麻醉机的压力通气模式辅助通气2 min。记录通气30、60、90、120 s时的呼吸参数（SPO2、PETCO2）,使用超声监测仪在诱导前及诱导后测量胃窦长短径并计算出胃窦面积。结果：两组的胃窦面积与通气前相比都有所增加，但P15组差异有统计学意义；两组患者诱导期间的气道压力峰值与所设定的基本一致，PETCO2、SPO2数值差异无统计学意义。结论：全麻诱导期应用顺式阿曲库铵在压力控制模式下的通气10 cmH2O（10次/min）压力组可以在保障通气的情况下减少胃胀气的发生。
Abstract:
Abstract 〖JP3〗Objective：To observe the influence of gastric insufflation in two different general anesthesia induction methods by ultrasonography of antrum.Methods：Forty female patients undergoing elective operation, were randomly assigned to two groups according to facemask ventilation pressure: 15 cmH2O,15 times/min(group P15),10 cmH2O,10 times/min（group P10）with twenty in each group.Patients were injected with propofol,sufentanil, cisatracurium for general anesthesia induction.after 1 minute , facemask pressure controlled ventilation for 2 minutes.Respiration parameters were recorded on 30 s(T1),60 s(T2), 90 s(T3),120 s(T4).The crosssectional antral area was calculated by measured transverse and longitudinal diameter using ultrasonography before and after facemask ventilation .Results：There was no significant different in respiratory parameters between the groups.The crosssectional antral area was increased in each group but group P15 has significant difference. Conclusion：Facemask pressure controlled ventilation during anesthesia induction,10 cmH2O （10 times/min）can guarantee adequate ventilation and relieve gastric insufflation.〖JP〗

参考文献/References:

［1］ Isono S,Eikermann M,Odaka T.Facemask ventilation during induction of anesthesia:how“gentle” is “gentle”enough?［J］.Anesthesiology,2014,120(2)：263265. ［2］ 〖JP3〗Bouvet L,Albert ML,Augris C,et al.Realtime detection of gastric insufflation related to facemask pressurecontrolled ventilation using ultrasonography of the antrum and epigastric auscultation in nonparalyzed patients;a prospective,randomized,doubleblind study ［J］.Anesthesiology,2014.120(2)：326334.〖JP〗 ［3］ 肖雪梅，程绍洪.单人行全身麻醉诱导不同通气方式对腹腔镜下胆囊切除术胃胀气的影响［J］.重庆医学，2015,44（15）：21562157. ［4］ 谢丰永，贺 涛，袁向华.食管阻塞法在腹腔镜胆囊切除术麻醉中的应用［J］.当代医学，2016,22（1）：4546.
\[5\] Bolondi L,Bortolotti M,Santi V,et al.Measurement of gastric Emptying timebyrealultrasonography\[J\].Gastroenterology,1985,89(4)：752759. ［6］ 郭 波，谢 冕，邓 林,等.超声评估麻醉诱导期胃胀气程度与术后恶心呕吐发生率的关系［J］.检验医学与临床,2017,14（12）：16941696. ［7］ 刘 平，干卓坤.超声评估为容量及胃内容物性质的研究［J］.中国医学影像学杂志,2016，24（4）：285288. ［8］ 励春颖，卢 波，孟 波,等.罗库溴铵对全麻患者面罩通气时围内进气的影响［J］.中华医学杂志，2015,95（32）：26162619. ［9］ Warters RD,Szabo TA,Spinale FG,et al.The effect of neuromuscular on mask ventilation blockade［J］. Anesthesia,2011,66(3):163167.〖ZK)〗 ［10］ 〖JP2〗Seet MM,Soliman KM,Sbeih ZF.Comparision of three modes of positive pressure mask ventilation during induction of anaethesia：a prospective,randomized,crossover study［J］.Eur J Anaesthesiol,2009,26(11):913916.〖JP〗 ［11］ 孙 震，卜亚男，吕 晶.超声评估全麻诱导不同通气压力对幼儿胃胀气的影响［J］.临床麻醉学杂志，2016,32（3）：230233. ［12］ 〖JP3〗Von Goedecke A,Voelckel WG, Hormann C,et al.Mechanical versus manual ventilatin via a face mask durinf the induction of anesthesia：a prospective,randomized,crossover study\[J\].Anesth Analg,2004,98(1)：260263.〖JP〗 ［13］ 〖JP4〗Lagarde S,Semjen F,NouetteGaulain K,et al.Facemask pressurecontrolled ventilation in children:what is the pressure limit?\[J\]. Anesth Analg,2010,110(6)：16761679.〖JP〗 ［14］ 杭黎华，卫世有，徐振锴.全麻诱导期成年患者的适宜面罩通气压力：实时超声测量胃窦部横截面积［J］.中华麻醉学杂志，2017,37（4）：461463.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘 瑶,吴赞情△,董补怀.不同气管导管套囊压力对腹腔镜胆囊切除术全身麻醉患者拔管时心血管反应的影响*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(8):987.
　LIU Yao,WU Zanqing,DONG Buhuai..Effects of different endotracheal tube cuff pressure on cardiovascular response during endotracheal extubation of general anesthesia[J].,2019,(2):987.
[2]李玲霞,高东梅,胡 彬,等.校正体重与学龄期肥胖患儿全麻机械通气潮气量相关性研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(9):1138.
　LI Lingxia,GAO Dongmei,HU Bin,et al.Adjustment for correlation between body weight and tide volume 〖JZ〗of mechanical ventilation in children with schoolage obesity[J].,2019,(2):1138.
[3]裴晓娟,吴高平△.超声引导神经阻滞联合全身麻醉在胫骨骨折手术中的麻醉效果及对患者应激反应的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(11):1477.
　PEI Xiaojuan,WU Gaoping.Effect of ultrasound guided nerve block combined with general anaesthesia on tibial fracture patients and its effect on stress response[J].,2019,(2):1477.
[4]王永徽,路志红,刘广林△,等.肌松程度和拮抗对经颅电刺激运动诱发电位的影响研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(12):1584.
　WANG Yonghui,LU Zhihong,LIU Guanglin,et al.Effect of neuromuscular blockade and reversal on transcranial motorevoked potentials[J].,2019,(2):1584.
[5]周 园,陈 琦.全身麻醉对大鼠学习记忆能力及脑额叶、海马和杏仁核半胱氨酸蛋白酶-3基因表达的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(2):139.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.02.003]
　ZHOU Yuan,CHEN Qi.Effects of general anesthesia on learning and memory ability and Caspase-3 gene expression in frontal lobe,hippocampus and amygdale of rats[J].,2021,50(2):139.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.02.003]
[6]刘林芝,黎 伟.全麻复合硬膜外麻醉对前列腺癌患者术中肌松剂使用量及应激反应的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2023,52(4):441.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.04.017]
　LIU Linzhi,LI Wei.Effect of general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia on dosage of muscle relaxant and stress response in patients with prostate cancer during operation[J].,2023,52(2):441.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.04.017]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题（16PJ062） 
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-13