[1]蒋洪波,杨龙涛,周红荣△.三种方法在子宫颈癌及癌前病变筛查中的价值比较[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):217-219.
　JIANG Hongbo,YANG Longtao,ZHOU Hongrong..Comparison of diagnostic value of three kinds of screening methods in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions[J].,2019,(2):217-219.
点击复制

三种方法在子宫颈癌及癌前病变筛查中的价值比较
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年2期
页码:
217-219
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of diagnostic value of three kinds of screening methods in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions
文章编号:
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2019.02.021
作者:
蒋洪波; 杨龙涛; 周红荣△
上海市长宁区妇幼保健院妇科（上海200051）
Author(s):
JIANG Hongbo; YANG Longtao; ZHOU Hongrong.
Department of Gynecology, Shanghai Changning Maternal and Child Health Hospital(Shanghai 200051)
关键词:
高危型人乳头瘤病毒检查; 液基薄层细胞学检查; 子宫颈癌; 癌前病变; 筛查; 对比研究
Keywords:
Key words Highrisk human papillomavirus examination;  Thinprep cytology test;  Cervical cancer;  Precancerous lesions; Screen; Comparative study
分类号:
R737.33
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的：比较三种筛查方法在子宫颈癌及癌前病变诊断中的价值。方法：对191例宫颈病变患者进行高危型人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）检查、液基薄层细胞学（TCT）检查以及高危HPV联合TCT检查，以病理活检为金标准，分析比较其在子宫颈癌及癌前病变诊断中的价值。结果：191例患者病理活检结果显示宫颈上皮正常59例，CIN I 21例，CIN II 38例，CIN III 35例，宫颈癌阳性38例。各年龄组CIN及宫颈癌阳性存在统计学差异（P<0.05），其中年龄为26~35岁组和36~45岁组CIN及宫颈癌阳性率明显大于46~55岁组和>55岁组（P<0.05）。高危HPV检查对子宫颈癌及癌前病变诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为85.60%、79.66%、83.77%、90.40%和71.21%；TCT检查对子宫颈癌及癌前病变诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为84.09%、88.14%、85.34%、94.07%和71.23%；〖JP2〗联合检查对子宫颈癌及癌前病变诊断灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为93.18%、93.22%、93.19%、96.85%和85.94%。结论：高危HPV联合TCT检查可提高子宫颈癌及癌前病变诊断信效度。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective: To compare the diagnostic value of three screening methods in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions.Methods: 191 cases of patients with cervical lesions were given highrisk human papillomavirus (HPV) examination, Thinprep cytology test (TCT) examination, and highrisk HPV combined with TCT. The pathologic biopsy was taken as gold standard to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions. Results: The pathologic biopsy results of 191 patients showed that there were 59 cases of normal cervical epithelium, 21 cases of CIN I, 38 cases of CIN II, 35 cases of CIN III and 38 cases of positive cervical cancer. There were significant differences in the positive rates of CIN and cervical cancer in all age groups (P<0.05), and the positive rates of CIN and cervical cancer in the 2635yearold group and the 3645yearold group were significantly higher than those in the 4655yearold group and the 55yearold group (P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions were 85.60%, 79.66%, 83.77%, 90.40% and 71.21% respectively by highrisk HPV examination, and were 84.09%, 88.14%, 85.34%, 94.07% and 71.23% respectively by TCT examination, and were 93.18%, 93.22%, 93.19%, 96.85% and 85.94% respectively by combined examination.Conclusion：Highrisk HPV combined with TCT can improve the reliability and validity of diagnosis for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions.

参考文献/References:

\[1\] 陈丽宏,刘晓琴,杨春荣,等.液基细胞学联合高危型HPV检测在宫颈疾病诊断中的应用\[J\].陕西医学杂志,2007,36(10):13771379.
\[2\] 蓝允莲, 王 岩, 郑丽萍. 宫颈病变患者人乳头状瘤病毒感染调查分析\[J\]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2015, 25(13)：31053106.
\[3\] 刘红卫,刘郁明,成 艳.子宫颈病变2015例与高危型HPV感染情况分析\[J\].陕西医学杂志,2010,39(10)：13271328.
\[4\] 方三高, 石群立, 周晓军,等. 解读2014年 WHO 女性生殖器官肿瘤分类(宫颈)\[J\]. 重庆医学, 2015, 44(28)：38893899.
\[5\] 潘子旻, 吕卫国. 绝经激素治疗在宫颈癌术后的应用\[J\]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2014, 30(12):887888.
\[6\] Walter FM, Mwaka AD, Neal RD. Achieving earlier diagnosis of symptomatic cervical cancer\[J\]. British Journal of General Practice the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014, 64(627):4956.
\[7\] 胡文斌, 史建国, 张 婷,等. 江苏省昆山市2006—2013年宫颈癌发病趋势分析\[J\]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2015, 22(21)：16581661.
\[8\] 沈谷群, 高冬梅, 张国庆. 高危型HPV负荷量与宫颈病变相关性及随访研究\[J\]. 中国妇幼保健, 2014, 29(22)：35593562.
\[9\] 陈 忆, 吴 丹, 李柱南,等. 宫颈液基细胞学和高危型HPVDNA检查在宫颈环形电切术后宫颈上皮内高度病变切缘累及患者随访中的价值\[J\]. 中华医学杂志, 2015, 95(17)：13311334.〖ZK)〗
\[10\] 吴翠霞, 张艳红, 葛小花,等. 高危型HPV感染与宫颈癌前病变与宫颈癌的相关性研究\[J\]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2016, 26(11):25682570.
\[11\] 吕倩灵, 张 玲, 林伟平. 高危型人乳头状瘤病毒及病毒载量对宫颈癌癌前病变的相关性分析\[J\]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, 24(4):804805.
\[12\] 许剑利, 徐克惠. 高危型HPV检测及TCT检查在宫颈癌筛查中的应用分析\[J\]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2014, 30(12)：946949.
\[13\] 曲芃芃. 关注女性生殖道HPV持续性感染\[J\]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2015, 34(6):450452.
\[14\] 陶志梅, 潘 敏, 俞美娟,等. 高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染联合液基薄层细胞检测对宫颈癌及宫颈癌前病变筛查与随访的临床意义\[J\]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2017, 27(10):23402343.
\[15\] 〖JP3〗Liu Y, Zhang L, Zhao G, et al. The clinical research of Thinprep Cytology Test (TCT) combined with HPVDNA detection in screening cervical cancer\[J\]. Cellular and molecular biology (NoisyleGrand, France), 2017, 63(2):92.〖JP〗
\[16\] 员周慧, 余 晓, 徐 舜,等. 子宫上皮细胞稳定性FH检测在宫颈癌前病变中的临床诊断意义分析\[J\]. 中国性科学, 2016, 25(11):3941.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-13