[1]肖东波.不保留小关节植骨床PLIF术治疗老年脊柱退行性疾病价值研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):189-192.
　XIAO Dongbo..The value of nonreserving small arthroplasty bone PLIF for senile spinal degenerative diseases[J].,2019,(2):189-192.
点击复制

不保留小关节植骨床PLIF术治疗老年脊柱退行性疾病价值研究*
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年2期
页码:
189-192
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
The value of nonreserving small arthroplasty bone PLIF for senile spinal degenerative diseases
文章编号:
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2019.02.014
作者:
肖东波
陕西省安康市中心医院（安康 725000）
Author(s):
XIAO Dongbo.
Ankang City Central Hospital, Shaanxi Province(Ankang 725000)
关键词:
脊柱退行性疾病; 治疗; 腰椎滑脱; 老年人; 不保留小关节植骨床PLIF手术; 临床价值
Keywords:
Key words Spinal degenerative disease; Therapy; Lumbar spondylolisthesis; Aged; PLIF of bone grafting with small joints is not retained; Clinical value
分类号:
R681.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的：探讨不保留小关节植骨床后路椎间植骨融合（PLIF）术治疗老年脊柱退行性疾病的价值。方法：选取116例腰椎滑脱患者纳入研究对象，以随机数表法分为观察组与对照组，每组58例。观察组行不保留小关节植骨床的PLIF手术治疗，对照组行传统PLIF手术治疗。对比两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后下床时间、住院时间及手术前后视觉模拟评分（VAS）、JOA下腰疼痛评分、ODI功能障碍指数、椎间隙高度、滑脱角各项指标，另外统计两组患者住院期间并发症发生情况。结果：观察组手术时间、术中出血量显著少于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组术后不同时点VAS、ODI评分与术前对比显著降低、两组术后不同时点JOA评分与术前对比显著提高，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），两组术前及术后不同时点VAS、JOA、ODI评分组间对比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；两组术后椎间隙高度与术前对比显著提高、两组术后滑脱角与术前对比显著降低，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），两组术前及术后椎间隙高度、滑脱角组间对比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），观察组并发症总发生率5.17%与对照组8.62%对比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：不保留小关节植骨床的PLIF手术与PLIF手术治疗老年腰椎滑脱患者均可取得满意的治疗效果，达到缓解患者疼痛、改善患者腰腿功能的作用，相对之下不保留小关节植骨床的PLIF手术具有手术时间短、术中出血量少的优势。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective：To study the value of nonreserving small arthroplasty bone PLIF for senile spinal degenerative diseases.Methods：A total of 116 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis treated were selected to be included in the study, and divided into the observation group and the control group by the random number table method, with 58 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with PLIF without reservation of small joint bone grafted bed, while the control group was treated with conventional PLIF.The perioperative operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative bed time, hospitalization time, VAS, JOA score, ODI score, intervertebral space height, and slip Angle were compared between the two groups, and the incidence of complications during the hospitalization of the two groups were also calculated.Results：The operation time and blood loss in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group (P<0.05).The VAS and ODI scores at different time points after operation were significantly lower than those before operation, and the JOA scores at different time points after operation were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the VAS, JOA, and ODI scores between the two groups before and after surgery (P>0.05).The height of intervertebral space after operation was significantly higher than that before operation, and the slip angle after operation was significantly lower than that before operation (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the height of intervertebral space and the angle of spondylolisthesis between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05).The total incidence of complications in the observation group was 5.17% and 8.62% in the control group, with no significant difference (P>0.05).Conclusion：PLIF surgery and PLIF surgery without retaining the small joint bone graftPatients with lumbar spondylolisthesis can achieve satisfactory therapeutic effects, relieve pain and improve the function of the patient's lower back and leg.In contrast, PLIF surgery that does not retain the small joint bone graft has the advantages of short operation time and less intraoperative blood loss.〖LM〗

参考文献/References:

\[1\] 王少华, 成业东. 微创TLIF技术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的研究进展\[J\]. 齐鲁医学杂志, 2015,30(4):502504.
\[2\] 刘玉增, 海 涌, 关 立,等. 手术治疗老年人退变性腰椎滑脱症对骨盆参数及脊柱矢状面平衡的影响\[J\]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2015, 34(11):11821185.
\[3\] 刘继军,田建宁.微创脊柱内镜系统辅助经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病疗效观察\[J\].陕西医学杂志,2017,46(11):15611563.
\[4\] Okuda S, Fujimori T, Oda T, et al. PatientBased Surgical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Patient Satisfaction Analysis\[J\]. Spine, 2016, 41(3):E148.
\[5\] 伊力夏提, 田 伟, 刘 波,等. 两种改良后路腰椎椎体间植骨融合术治疗单节段脊柱退行性疾病\[J\]. 中国医刊, 2012, 47(10):7072.
\[6\] 徐 栋, 贾庆卫, 朱宝林,等. 螺旋CT三维重建在腰椎滑脱症诊断及手术中的价值\[J\]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2007, 4(6):1517.
\[7\] 董献成, 王庆伟, 荆 鑫,等. 应用PLIF及TLIF治疗腰椎退变性疾病的比较研究\[J\]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2016, 37(6):507510.
\[8\] 种衍学, 李 明, 朱中蛟,等. 显微镜下MITLIF与传统PLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较\[J\]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2016, 31(5):457460.
\[9\] 杜 兴, 欧云生, 朱 勇,等. Dynesys动态稳定系统与腰后路椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性变疗效的Meta分析\[J\]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2016,16(12):14141422.〖ZK)〗
\[10\] 毛晓艳, 贾博浩, 吴一梦,等. 毛书歌应用三步五法矫正术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱经验\[J\]. 中医药导报, 2016,22(23)：119120.
\[11\] 罗盛飞, 张德俭. 核心稳定性训练与植入物内固定腰椎融合修复退变性腰椎滑脱:腰椎功能评价\[J\]. 中国组织工程研究, 2015, 19(31):50365040.
\[12\] Kim JY, Park JY, Kim KH, et al.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis: comparison between isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis\[J\]. World Neurosurgery, 2015, 84(5):12841293.
\[13\] 李耀章, 张巧凤, 党培业,等. PLIF和PLF在下腰椎单节段腰椎滑脱中的治疗疗效比较\[J\]. 现代生物医学进展, 2017,17(30):58665869.
\[14\] 谭小云, 蒲 涛, 刘计鲁,等. 改良后路椎间植骨融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病\[J\]. 临床骨科杂志, 2015,18(3)：292295.
\[15\] 蔡平原, 黄 帅, 陈升浩,等. PLIF技术在退变性腰椎滑脱并椎管狭窄症治疗中的应用\[J\]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2016, 13(3):3437.
\[16\] 田 伟, 李加宁, 韩 骁,等. TLIF与PLIF治疗老年退变性腰椎滑脱并椎管狭窄症的比较\[J\]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2017, 25(17)：15371540.
\[17\] 代朋乙, 黄昌林. 可注射骨水泥椎弓根螺钉系统联合椎间融合治疗腰椎滑脱并骨质疏松症的临床效果观察\[J\]. 解放军医学杂志, 2016, 41(10):853858.
\[18\] 蔡 俊, 张 亮, 张志强,等. 改良单侧后路椎体间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出合并椎管狭窄的疗效分析\[J\]. 中国全科医学, 2016,19(S1)：197199.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐 博,苏军涛,钟 烨,等.外源性Apelin13对重症急性胰腺炎大鼠治疗作用及其机制研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):148.
　XU Bo,SU Juntao,ZHONG Ye,et al.Effect and mechanism of exogenous apelin13 on severe acute pancreatitis in rats[J].,2019,(2):148.
[2]陈保春,刘利峰.铥激光与等离子电切术治疗膀胱癌疗效对比研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):159.
　CHEN Baochun,LIU Lifeng..Comparative study of thulium laser and plasma electroresection in resection of bladder tumor[J].,2019,(2):159.
[3]张玉亮,朱 宏,戴洪山△.B超引导经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术在胆源性胰腺炎治疗中的临床意义[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):166.
　ZHANG Yuliang,ZHU Hong,DAI Hongshan..Clinical significance of Bmode ultrasound guided percutaneous transhepatic  gallbladder puncture and drainage in the treatment of biliary pancreatitis[J].,2019,(2):166.
[4]徐建庆,买赛虎△,杨喜佳,等.腹腔镜手术治疗复杂性胆囊炎临床疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):176.
　XU Jianqing,MAI Saihu,YANG Xijia,et al.Analysis of curative effect in laparoscopic surgery for complicated cholecystitis[J].,2019,(2):176.
[5]刘 侃,杨栓元,刘旭晨,等.PPH术治疗III、IV度痔中长期疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):183.
　LIU Kan,YANG Shuanyuan,LIU Xucheng,et al.Curative effect of PPH for III and IV hemorrhoids[J].,2019,(2):183.
[6]石 丹,张会久,周达岸.闭合复位经皮空心螺钉内固定与切开复位内固定治疗踝关节骨折疗效对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):186.
　SHI Dan,ZHANG Huijiu,ZHOU Daan..Comparison of closed reduction, percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and open reduction  and internal fixation for ankle fractures[J].,2019,(2):186.
[7]高清滢,侯洁心△.高频电波刀宫颈电环切除术治疗中重度宫颈柱状上皮异位临床疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):223.
　GAO Qingying,HOU Jiexin..Observation on the clinical effect of high frequency electric wave knife cervix electroloop resection in the〖JP〗 〖JP4〗treatment of moderate and severe Cervical columnar epithelium ectopicdiagnosed by pathological examination[J].,2019,(2):223.
[8]宋 婷,罗 莉,贾 菲,等.1540 nm非剥脱性点阵激光联合水凝胶医用冷敷贴治疗 凹陷性痤疮瘢痕疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):241.
　SONG Ting,LUO Li,JIA Fei,et al.Effiicacy of nonablative 1540nm fractional laser with medical cool patch in the treatment of acne sca[J].,2019,(2):241.
[9]张 彦,陈 龙.胃镜下肾上腺素与凝血酶联合治疗消化性溃疡合并出血疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):259.
[10]李丁昌,杜 虹,赵 燕,等.陕西地区首发3例人感染H7N9重症禽流感救治临床研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(3):314.
　LI Dingchang,DU Hong,ZHAO Yanyan,et al.Analysis of the treatment of the first three cases ofhuman infection with H7N9 avian influenza in shaanxi province[J].,2019,(2):314.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 陕西省自然科学基金资助项目（2016JM8136）
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-13