[1]赵懿,田俊斌,薛佳佳,等.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在无痛胃肠镜诊疗中的有效性和安全性评价[J].陕西医学杂志,2026,(6):822-825,831.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2026.06.017]
 ZHAO Yi,TIAN Junbin,XUE Jiajia,et al.Evaluation of efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy[J].,2026,(6):822-825,831.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2026.06.017]
点击复制

甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在无痛胃肠镜诊疗中的有效性和安全性评价

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2026年6期
页码:
822-825,831
栏目:
药物与临床
出版日期:
2026-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy
作者:
赵懿1田俊斌2薛佳佳3刘苗1王雨薇1肖娇4杨扬1王娜1
(1.西安交通大学第二附属医院药学部,陕西 西安 710004;2.西安交通大学第二附属医院麻醉科,陕西 西安 710004;3.西安市杨陵区揉谷卫生院药剂科,陕西 咸阳 712100;4.柞水县中医医院药剂科,陕西 柞水 711400)
Author(s):
ZHAO Yi1TIAN Junbin2XUE Jiajia3LIU Miao1WANG Yuwei1XIAO Jiao4YANG Yang1WANG Na1
(1.Department of Pharmacy,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710004,China;2.Department of Anesthesiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710004,China;3.Yangling District Rougu Health Center,Xianyang 712100,China;4.Zhashui County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhashui 711400,China)
关键词:
甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑无痛胃肠镜丙泊酚镇静安全性有效性
Keywords:
Remimazolam tosylatePainless gastrointestinal endoscopyPropofolSedationSafetyEffectiveness
分类号:
R 614
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2026.06.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探索甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在无痛胃肠镜诊疗中的有效性及安全性。方法:回顾性收集行无痛胃肠镜检查的35例患者,分为甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组和丙泊酚组。甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组初始给药剂量为5.0 mg,根据镇静情况追加2.5 mg/次;丙泊酚组初始剂量为1.5 mg/kg,根据镇静情况每次追加0.5 mg/kg,两次间隔均不少于1 min。比较两组患者的镇静效果、药物追加情况、不良反应发生情况以及麻醉过程中各时间点的血流动力学指标。结果:两组患者镇静成功率均为100%。甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组注射痛发生率显著低于丙泊酚组(P<0.05)。未观察到两组患者在低血压、低血氧、呼吸抑制、心动过缓、头晕发生率上存在统计学差异(均P>0.05)。尽管甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组的诱导时间长于丙泊酚组(P<0.05),但两组患者镇静效果与两组药物追加率和频次比较无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组在T3及T4的HR显著高于丙泊酚组(均P<0.05),两组患者MAP、SpO2 、RR各时间点组间比较无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。结论:甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑用于无痛胃肠镜诊疗的镇静效果与丙泊酚相当,同时能减少注射痛,可作为无痛胃肠镜诊疗镇静的新选择。
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of Remimazolam tosylate in sedating patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy.Methods:A retrospective analysis of 35 patients who underwent painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy was conducted,and they were divided into the remimazolam tosylate group and the propofol group.The initial dose of remimazolam tosylate was 5.0 mg,and 2.5 mg was added each time according to the sedation status;the initial dose of propofol was 1.5 mg/kg,and 0.5 mg/kg was added each time according to the sedation status,with an interval of no less than 1 minute between each addition.The sedation effect,drug addition situation,adverse reaction occurrence,and hemodynamic indicators at each time point during anesthesia were compared between the two groups.Results:The sedation success rate of both groups of patients was 100%.The incidence of injection pain in the remimazolam tosylate group was significantly lower than that in the propofol group (P<0.05).No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidences of hypotension,low blood oxygen,respiratory depression,bradycardia,and dizziness between the two groups of patients (all P>0.05).Although the induction time of the remimazolam tosylate group was longer than that of the propofol group (P<0.05),there were no statistically significant differences in the sedation effects,the rate of drug addition,and frequency between the two groups (all P>0.05).The HR of the remimazolam tosylate group at T3 and T4 was significantly higher than that of the propofol group (all P<0.05),and there were no statistically significant differences in MAP,SpO2,and RR at each time point between the two groups (all P>0.05).Conclusion:Remimazolam tosylate for sedation in painless gastroenterological endoscopy has an equivalent effect to propofol,and it can also reduce injection pain.It can be regarded as a new option for sedation in painless gastroenterological endoscopy.

参考文献/References:

[1]ZHOU L,LIN L,YE X,et al.Analysis of factors and pathways influencing patients’ level of worry about painless gastrointestinal endoscopy[J].Medicine,2025,104(43):e45070.[2]SAHINOVIC M M,STRUYS M M,ABSALOM A R.Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol[J].Clin Pharmacokinet,2018,57(12):1539-1558.[3]TIAN Y Q,CHEN D K,ZHANG H M,et al.Comparative analysis of the therapeutic efficacy of remimazolam tosylate and propofol in older adults undergoing painless endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography[J].Front Pharmacol,2024,15:1404536.[4]WADHWA V,ISSA D,GARG S,et al.Similar risk of cardiopulmonary adverse events between propofol and traditional anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2017,15(2):194-206.[5]李富贵,王云,马颖才.苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在老年无痛胃肠镜检查中的应用及对患者血流动力学的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(2):222-225.[6]贾涛,刘辉,滕金亮.瑞马唑仑的药理特点、安全性及联合用药研究进展[J].中国药房,2023,34(8):1020-1024.[7]JHUANG B J,YEH B H,HUANG Y T,et al.Efficacy and safety of remimazolam for procedural sedation:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis[J].Frontiers in Medicine,2021,8:641866.[8]韦艳霞.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合芬太尼用于老年患者无痛胃镜诊疗的临床研究[D].南宁:广西医科大学,2022.[9]SPAANDER M C,VAN DER BOGT R D,BARON T H,et al.Esophageal stenting for benign and malignant disease:European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline-update 2021[J].Endoscopy,2021,53(7):751-762.[10]陈康康,张志宇,张艺佳,等.新型镇静药物瑞马唑仑临床应用研究进展[J].陕西医学杂志,2023,52(8):1106-1109.[11]ZHOU C,ZHU Y,LIU Z,et al.Effect of pretreatment with midazolam on etomidate-induced myoclonus:A meta-analysis[J].J Int Med Res,2017,45(2):399-406.[12]赵娟,陈金权.瑞马唑仑对老年大鼠海马B淋巴细胞瘤-2、一氧化氮合酶蛋白表达及神经元凋亡和认知功能的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(3):289-292.[13]MORIMOTO Y.Efficacy and safety profile of remimazolam for sedation in adults undergoing short surgical procedures[J].Ther Clin Risk Manag,2022,18:95-100.[14]LEE S,LEE J,HWANG S Y,et al.Remimazolam-flumazenil provides fast recovery from general anesthesia compared to propofol during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation[J].Sci Rep,2024,14(1):12660.[15]TANG Y,YANG X,YU Y,et al.Remimazolam versus traditional sedatives for procedural sedation:A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes[J].Minerva Anestesiol,2022,88(11):939-949. [16]WANG X,HU X,BAI N,et al.Safety and efficacy of remimazolam besylate in patients undergoing colonoscopy:A multicentre,single-blind,randomized,controlled,phase Ⅲ trial[J].Front Pharmacol,2022,13:900723.[17]王迪,赵鑫,王风娟,等.静脉注射苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在儿童无痛胃镜检查中的应用效果[J].山东医药,2025,65(12):104-107.[18]XU C,HE L,REN J,et al.Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate combined with alfentanil in painless gastroscopy:A randomized,single-blind,parallel controlled study[J].Contrast Media Mol Imaging,2022,2022(1):7102293.[19]任倩倩,朱承选,张迪,等.苯磺酸瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚在高龄患者中度镇静下行无痛胃镜检查的应用效果[J].转化医学杂志,2025,14(5):142-147.[20]姚纹纹,彭基斌,方明星,等.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在肠道ESD中的安全性和有效性[J].皖南医学院学报,2024,43(2):168-171.[21]CHEN S H,YUAN T M,ZHANG J,et al.Remimazolam tosilate in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy:A multicenter,randomized,non-inferiority,phase Ⅲ trial[J].J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2021,36(2):474-481.[22]张霞,孙传玉,郭蕾,等.瑞马唑仑联合舒芬太尼静脉注射在肥胖患者无痛胃肠镜检查中的应用效果[J].山东医药,2024,64(34):79-82.[23]张毅,叶刚,张亮,等.瑞马唑仑用于门诊无痛胃镜镇静的临床观察[J].中国药房,2022,33(4):492-496.[24]刘鹏,梁贇,张闪闪,等.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚应用于无痛胃肠镜安全性及有效性Meta分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(6):753-759.[25]陈艳杰,赵同航.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合艾司氯胺酮在肝硬化患者无痛内镜下静脉曲张套扎术中的安全性和有效性[J].实用药物与临床,2024,27(10):750-756.

相似文献/References:

[1]史劲飞,戴筱筱,彭 辉,等.环泊酚、丙泊酚分别联合布托啡诺麻醉在老年无痛胃肠镜检查中的应用比较[J].陕西医学杂志,2024,(6):814.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2024.06.020]
 SHI Jinfei,DAI Xiaoxiao,PENG Hui,et al.Comparison on application of ciprofol and propofol combined with butorphanol anesthesia in painless gastroenteroscopy for elderly patients[J].,2024,(6):814.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2024.06.020]
[2]徐 天,马 兰.右美托咪定与利多卡因靶控输注在无痛胃肠镜麻醉中的相互作用和配伍方案优化[J].陕西医学杂志,2024,(6):823.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2024.06.022]
 XU Tian,MA Lan.Interaction and compatibility optimization of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine target controlled infusion in painless gastroscopy anesthesia[J].,2024,(6):823.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2024.06.022]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所医院药学高质量发展研究项目(NIHAZX202426)
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-06-05