[1]梁晓芳,李晓利,张占华,等.社区获得性肺炎患者中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值和血小板/淋巴细胞比值水平及意义[J].陕西医学杂志,2026,(4):546-549.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2026.04.020]
 LIANG Xiaofang,LI Xiaoli,ZHANG Zhanhua,et al.The Levels and Significance of NLR and PLR in Patients with CommunityAcquired Pneumonia[J].,2026,(4):546-549.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2026.04.020]
点击复制

社区获得性肺炎患者中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值和血小板/淋巴细胞比值水平及意义

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2026年4期
页码:
546-549
栏目:
临床检验
出版日期:
2026-04-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Levels and Significance of NLR and PLR in Patients with CommunityAcquired Pneumonia
作者:
梁晓芳李晓利张占华卫尧荀梅
(西安交通大学附属红会医院,陕西 西安 710000)
Author(s):
LIANG XiaofangLI XiaoliZHANG ZhanhuaWEI YaoXUN Mei
(Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710000,China)
关键词:
中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值血小板/淋巴细胞比值社区获得性肺炎应用价值成人
Keywords:
Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratioPlatelet/lymphocyte ratioCommunity acquired pneumoniaApplication valueAdult
分类号:
R 563.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2026.04.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在成人社区获得性肺炎中的应用价值。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,选取治疗的成人社区获得性肺炎患者300例,根据患者治疗后28 d生存情况分为生存组(272例)和死亡组(28例),分析生存组和死亡组患者临床资料差异。结果:死亡组患者年龄≥60岁,占比为53.57%,高于生存组(P<0.05);死亡组患者重症占比为57.14%,高于生存组(P<0.05);死亡组患者NLR、PLR分别为(9.10±1.41)和(202.23±43.52),高于生存组(均P<0.05);细菌性肺炎患者NLR和PLR明显高于病毒性和支原体肺炎(均P<0.05);支原体肺炎患者NLR和PLR明显高于病毒性肺炎(均P<0.05);Logistic回归分析,结果显示:年龄、严重程度、NLR和PLR是患者死亡的影响因素(均P<0.05);NLR、PLR预测患者预后的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.904(95%CI:0.854~0.954)和0.708(95%CI:0.621~0.795)(均P<0.05),截断值分别为8.10和187.84,灵敏度分别为78.60%和64.30%,特异度分别为91.20%和72.40%。结论:NLR和PLR是成人社区获得性肺炎患者预后的影响因素,其中NLR预测预后的价值较高。
Abstract:
Objective:Toexplore the application value of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in adult community acquired pneumonia.Methods:A retrospective study method were used,300 adult patients with communityacquired pneumonia who were treated in our hospital from January 2022 to January 2025 were selected,they were divided into a survival group (272 cases) and a death group (28 cases) based on their 28 day survival after treatment,the clinical data differences between the survival group and the death group were analyzed.Results:The proportion of patients with age ≥ 60 years old and severe cases in the death group was 53.57%,which were higher than that in the survival group (P<0.05).The proportion of patients with severe cases in the death group was 57.14%,which were higher than that in the survival group (P<0.05).The NLR and PLR of patients in the death group were (9.10±1.41) and (202.23±43.52),respectively,which were higher than those in the survival group (all P<0.05).The NLR and PLR of patients with bacterial pneumonia were significantly higher than those with viral and mycoplasma pneumonia (all P<0.05).The NLR and PLR of patients with mycoplasma pneumonia were significantly higher than those with viral pneumonia (all P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that age,severity,NLR,and PLR were the influencing factors for patient mortality (all P<0.05).The area under the ROC curve for predicting patient prognosis by NLR and PLR was 0.904 (95%CI:0.854~0.954) and 0.708 (95%CI:0.621~0.795),respectively,P<0.05,cutoff values were 8.10 and 187.84,sensitivity were 78.60% and 64.30%,specificity were 91.20% and 72.40%,respectively.The proportion of patients aged ≥ 60 years in the severe group was 58.43%,which was higher than that in the mild group (all P<0.05).Conclusion:NLR and PLR are influencing factors for the prognosis of adult community acquired pneumonia patients,with NLR having higher predictive value.

参考文献/References:

[1]曹孟孟,朱华栋.老年社区获得性肺炎的临床特征及诊疗进展[J].中国急救医学,2020,40(3):268-273.
[2]DIVINO V,SCHRAHZ J,EARLY M,et al.The annual economic burden among patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP):A retrospective US cohort study[J].Curr Med Res Opin,2020,36(1):151-160.
[3]王子铭,屈越,黄梅,等.重症成人社区获得性肺炎列线图预测模型的构建和验证[J].中华危重病急救医学,2022,34(9):935-940.
[4]蔡杰瑞,陈洪.血小板/淋巴细胞比值和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在溃疡性结肠炎中的临床价值[J].临床内科杂志,2020,37(11):785-788.
[5]何祯硕,高盼,冀英双,等.SⅡ与d-NLR在诊断成人社区获得性肺炎中的价值[J].国际检验医学杂志,2023,44(6):693-697.
[6]中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等.成人社区获得性肺炎基层诊疗指南(2018年版)[J].中华全科医师杂志,2019,18(2):117-126.
[7]洪军,陈敏华.临床肺部感染评分评估呼吸机相关性肺炎预后的研究[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2011,10(3):289-291.
[8]刘熙,李琦.我国成人社区获得性肺炎诊疗现状及思考[J].中华肺部疾病杂志:电子版,2021,14(3):387-389.
[9]王玫,赵建玉,李雪,等.2015至2019年北京某医院住院患者成人社区获得性肺炎病原学特点及防控研究[J].中华预防医学杂志,2021,55(12):1410-1418.
[10]EBELL MARK H,BENTIVEGNA M,CAI X,et al.Accuracy of biomarkers for the diagnosis of adult community-acquired pneumonia:A meta-analysis[J].Academic Emergency Medicine,2020,27(3):195-206.
[11]DANNY T,FABIAN C,PAUL S,et al.Epidemiology and microbiology of severe community-acquired pneumonia in central australia:A retrospective study[J].Internal Medicine Journal,2022,52(6):1048-1056.
[12]LEBLANC J J,ELSHERIF M,YE L Y,et al.Recalibrated estimates of non-bacteremic and bacteremic pneumococcal community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized Canadian adults from 2010 to 2017 with addition of an extended spectrum serotype-specific urine antigen detection assay[J].Vaccine,2022,40(18):2635-2646.
[13]VILLAFUERTE D,ALIBERTI S,FAVERIO P,et al.Prevalence and risk factors for enterobacteriaceae enterobacteriaceae in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia[J].Respirology,2020,25(5):543-551.
[14]IQBAL N,IRFAN M,SIDDIQUE F,et al.Factors predicting in-hospital mortality among patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia at a tertiary care hospital Karachi,Pakistan[J].The Clinical Respiratory Journal,2020,14(4):328-334.
[15]谢小兵.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对呼吸机相关性肺炎病情严重程度及预后的评估价值[J].河北医学,2020,26(1):8-13.
[16]杨凯祥,牛玉军.冠心病斑块易损性及预后与血小板/淋巴细胞比值及中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值相关性研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(1):44-47.
[17]YU J,WANG G L,DAVIDSON A,et al.Antibiotics utilization for community acquired pneumonia in a community hospital emergency department[J].Journal of Pharmacy Practice,2022,35(1):62-69.
[18]俞婷,余小丽,李鸿茹,等.高龄老年人社区获得性肺炎不同病原体感染的特点及危险因素分析[J].临床肺科杂志,2023,28(4):590-593,599.
[19]LARA M A,ELENA T,ORVILLE B P,et al.Empiric antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients:A systematic review and a network meta-analysis[J].Thorax:The Journal of the British Thoracic Society,2021,76(10):1020-1031.
[20]许圣慧,王坤芳,谢轩,等.老年2型糖尿病合并社区获得性肺炎的病原学特点及死亡危险因素分析[J].临床误诊误治,2024,37(13):45-50.
[21]杨珂,于树云.NLR和RDW在评估成人社区获得性肺炎严重程度及预后中的临床价值[J].天津医科大学学报,2021,27(1):22-27.
[22]牛泰然.重症肺炎患者中性粒细胞、降钙素原对病情严重程度的预测及列线图分析[J].山西医药杂志,2025,54(8):563-566.
[23]刘洋,戈艳蕾,孙晔,等.NLR、PLR对社区获得性肺炎严重程度的预测价值[J].华北理工大学学报(医学版),2021,23(6):438-443.
[24]周红,巫瑞,王丽,等.肺炎支原体肺炎患者血清PLR、NLR变化与血清MP-IgM抗体滴度的相关性及临床意义[J].分子诊断与治疗杂志2025,17,(6):1088-1090,1094.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱志坚,孙丽芳,陆志刚 .外周血中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对急性心肌梗死患者预后的预测价值[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(10):1326.
 ZHU Zhijian,SUN Lifang,LU Zhigang..Prognostic value of peripheral blood neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for 〖JZ〗longterm prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].,2019,(4):1326.
[2]朱小川.血小板/淋巴细胞比值预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期〖JZ〗伴有早期肾功能损害临床价值[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(10):1353.
 ZHU Xiaochuan..Clinical value of platelet/lymphocyte ratio in predicting early renal impairment〖JZ〗 in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J].,2019,(4):1353.
[3]代 佳,李 林,贺 林,等.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值、血小板/淋巴细胞比值与肺癌早期诊断以及临床病理特征相关性分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2023,52(4):468.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.04.024]
[4]张解,孙婷婷,马聪,等.维持性血液透析患者血清中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞、甲状旁腺素水平变化及并发感染病原菌分布和预后分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2025,54(10):1386.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2025.10.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2021JM576)
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-04-05