[1]唐 杰,张 博,张 蕾.氢吗啡酮联合κ受体激动剂纳布啡对腹腔镜全子宫切除术后患者镇痛和免疫功能的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2024,(10):1381-1386.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2024.10.018]
　TANG Jie,ZHANG Bo,ZHANG Lei.Effects of hydromorphone combined with κ receptor agonist nabophan on analgesia and immune function after laparoscopic total hysterectomy[J].,2024,(10):1381-1386.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2024.10.018]
点击复制

氢吗啡酮联合κ受体激动剂纳布啡对腹腔镜全子宫切除术后患者镇痛和免疫功能的影响
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年10期
页码:
1381-1386
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2024-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of hydromorphone combined with κ receptor agonist nabophan on analgesia and immune function after laparoscopic total hysterectomy
作者:
唐 杰; 张 博; 张 蕾
(西安市人民医院 西安市第四医院麻醉与围手术医学科, 陕西 西安 710004)
Author(s):
TANG Jie; ZHANG Bo; ZHANG Lei
(Xi'an People's Hospital,Xi'an 710004,China)
关键词:
纳布啡;  氢吗啡酮;  腹腔镜全子宫切除术;  患者自控静脉镇痛;  免疫功能;  术后恢复
Keywords:
Nalbuphine;  Hydromorphone;  Laparoscopic total hysterectomy;  Patient controlled intravenous analgesia;  Immune function;  Recovery after surgery
分类号:
R 713.4
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2024.10.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:观察纳布啡复合氢吗啡酮对腹腔镜全子宫切除术后患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)和免疫功能的影响。方法:将103例择期行腹腔镜全子宫切除术的患者随机分为观察组(n=52)和对照组(n=51),两组均实施气管插管静脉全麻,并在术后接受PCIA直至术后48 h,对照组以PCIA实施方案为枸橼酸舒芬太尼注射液(2.0 μg/kg)+盐酸纳布啡注射液(0.8 mg/kg)+0.9%氯化钠注射液100 ml。观察组为盐酸氢吗啡酮注射液(2.0 μg/kg)+盐酸纳布啡注射液(0.1 mg/kg)+0.9%氯化钠注射液100 ml。观察术后不同时间点疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后48 h镇痛效果、术后恢复情况,术后不同时间点免疫功能指标的变化。记录两组术后48 h内的不良反应。结果:与对照组比较,观察组术后6、12、24 h静息时VAS评分较低,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),但在术后48 h两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 观察组活动时术后6～48 h的VAS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组镇痛泵总按压次数和有效按压次数、补救镇痛和托烷司琼用量均低于对照组,术后首次排气时间、首次进食时间、首次下床时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),两组术后住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与术前比较,两组术后6～24 h的CD3+、CD4+和CD4+/ CD8+均显著降低,CD8+显著增加,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),在术后48 h时观察组上述指标与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。而对照组与术前比较差异仍有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组在术后6～24 h的CD8+低于对照组,其余指标均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。与对照组比较,观察组48 h内的恶心、头晕发生率均较低,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论:与纳布啡复合舒芬太尼相比,腹腔镜全子宫切除术后PCIA中采用纳布啡复合氢吗啡酮的镇痛效果更佳,患者术后恢复和免疫功能改善情况更好,且头晕和恶心等不良反应发生率更低。
Abstract:
Objective:To observe the effect of nabophan combined with hydromorphone on patient controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)and immune function in patients after laparoscopic total hysterectomy.Methods:A total of 103 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic total hysterectomy were randomly divided into observation group(52 cases)and control group(51 cases).Both groups underwent endotracheal intubation intravenous general anesthesia,and received PCIA until 48 hours after surgery.The control group was implemented by PCIA as sufentanil citrate injection(2.0 μg/kg)+nalbuphine hydrochloride injection(0.8 mg/kg)+0.9% sodium chloride injection 100 ml.The observation group was hydromorphone hydrochloride injection(2.0 μg/kg)+nalbuphine hydrochloride injection(0.1 mg/kg)+0.9% sodium chloride injection 100 ml.The analgesic effect at 48 hours after surgery,postoperative recovery,and the changes of immune function indexes and Visual Analogue Score(VAS)at different time points after surgery were observed.The adverse reactions of the two groups within 48 hours after surgery were recorded.Results:Compared with the control group,the VAS scores at rest at 6,12 and 24 hours in the observation group were lower(all P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between the two groups at 48 hours after surgery(all P>0.05).The VAS scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 6 to 48 hours after operation(P<0.05).The total number of analgesic pump compressions,effective compressions,salvage analgesia and tropisetron dosage in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the time of first postoperative gassing,first feeding and first time of getting out of bed were shorter than those in the control group(all P<0.05),while there was no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups(all P>0.05).Compared with the preoperative period,the CD3+,CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ levels in the two groups were significantly decreased at 6 to 24 hours after surgery,and the CD8+ was significantly increased(all P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between the above indexes and the preoperative comparison between the observation group and the preoperative comparison at 48 hours after operation(all P>0.05).However,there was still a statistically significant difference between the control group and the preoperative group(all P<0.05).The CD8+ in the observation group was lower than that in the control group at 6 to 24 hours after surgery,and the other indexes were higher than those in the control group(all P<0.05).Compared with the control group,the incidence of nausea and dizziness in the observation group within 48 hours was lower(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with nalbuphine combined with sufentanil,the analgesic effect of nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone in PCIA after laparoscopic total hysterectomy is better,the postoperative recovery and immune function improvement are better,and the incidence of adverse reactions such as dizziness and nausea is lower.

参考文献/References:

[1] MISIRLIOGLU S,GIRAY B,VATANSEVER D,et al.Mini-plus percutaneous setting in total laparoscopic hysterectomy[J].Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol,2022,31(2):284-290.
[2] 陈燕,和优娟,张东东,等.静脉自控镇痛联合胸椎旁神经阻滞对腹腔镜肝癌根治术患者细胞免疫功能及血清致痛物质水平的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(2):186-190.
[3] TANAKA Y,HIGAMI S,SHIRAISHI M,et al.Total laparoscopic hysterectomy when there is posterior cul-de-sac obliteration:a step-by-step nerve-sparing technique[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2023,229(2):178-180.
[4] 刘丽,李远志.地佐辛混合舒芬太尼PCIA对子宫切除术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2020,40(10):1275-1276.
[5] CHEN J W,TIAN L,ZHANG L,et al.Nalbuphine on postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction after laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological malignancies:A randomized controlled trial[J].Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol,2021,48(2):170-176.
[6] RODRIGUES S,SHIN D,CONWAY M,et al.Hydromorphone versus morphine:A historical cohort study to evaluate the quality of postoperative analgesia[J].Can J Anaesth,2021,68(2):226-234.
[7] HUANG C Y,LI S X,YANG M J,et al.A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia[J].Chin Med J(Engl),2020,133(5):523-529.
[8] SHAFSHAK T S,ELNEMR R.The visual analogue scale versus numerical rating scale in measuring pain severity and predicting disability in low back pain[J].J Clin Rheumatol,2021,27(7):282-285.
[9] JIANG B,YE S.Pharmacotherapeutic pain management in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy:A review[J].Adv Clin Exp Med,2022,31(11):1275-1288.
[10] 邓亚南,潘小妮,刘鑫,等.针刺与腰丛神经阻滞在全髋关节置换术患者超前镇痛中的应用比较[J].陕西中医,2022,43(10):1455-1458.
[11] 黄艳华,资瑜.子宫肌瘤腹腔镜手术中行依托咪酯靶控输注联合纳布啡麻醉效果及对患者PGE2、VEGF-C水平影响[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2022,30(5):1070-1074.
[12] ZHONG W,CHEN C,TANG W.Effective doses of nalbuphine combined with propofol in painless hysteroscopy[J].Int J Gen Med,2022,15:5609-5614.
[13] WANG L,WANG Y,MA Y,et al.Sufentanil combined with nalbuphine via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after cesarean section:A retrospective evaluation[J].Drug Des Devel Ther,2022,16:3711-3721.
[14] 焦明娜,霍红艳.氢吗啡酮复合右美托咪啶对老年腹腔镜胃肠道手术患者血流动力学、镇痛效果和不良反应的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2023,52(2):200-203,207.
[15] MAHAJAN L,SINGH A P,KAUR S S,et al.Comparison of the efficacy of intraperitoneal instillation of butorphanol versus nalbuphine as adjuvants to ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia:A randomized,double-blind placebo-controlled study[J].Anesth Essays Res,2022,16(2):191-196.
[16] NIE Z B,LI Z H,LU B,et al.Hydromorphone vs sufentanil in patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management:A meta-analysis[J].Medicine(Baltimore),2022,101(3):e28615.
[17] SONG Y,HE Q,HUANG W,et al.New insight into the analgesic recipe:A cohort study based on smart patient-controlled analgesia pumps records[J].Front Pharmacol,2022,13:988070.
[18] SRIDHARAN K,SIV-ARAMAKRISHNAN G.Comparison of fentanyl, remifentanil,sufentanil and alfentanil in combination with propofol for general anesthesia:A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled Trials[J].Curr Clin Pharmacol,2019,14(2):116-124.
[19] 孙浩,曹丽,曹林,等.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌患者应用氢吗啡酮联合纳布啡静脉自控镇痛控制疼痛作用研究[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2022,25(3):415-418.
[20] ALBERS K I,POLAT F,HELDER L,et al.Quality of recovery and innate immune homeostasis in patients undergoing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery(RECOVER):A randomized controlled trial[J].Ann Surg,2022,276(6):e664-e673.
[21] MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ A B,ARBONES-MAINAR J M.Colorectal cancer:Immune response in laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery[J].Cir,2022,90(3):295-302.
[22] 马燕玲,古丽加耐提?艾耐托拉.改良腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿伴不孕症疗效及对T淋巴细胞及妊娠结局影响[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2022,30(5):1036-1039.
[23] LI H,LI J,HAO C,et al.Effects of anesthetic depth on perioperative T lymphocyte subsets in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery:A prospective,parallel-controlled randomized trial[J].BMC Anesthesiol,2023,23(1):165.
[24] 王亭,路瑶,郭庆宏,等.艾司氯胺酮与阿片类镇痛药对妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后细胞免疫功能影响的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2021,41(11):1321-1325.
[25] 程晨.舒芬太尼静脉靶向控制输注对腹腔镜子宫切除患者T淋巴细胞亚群血清血栓素A2及前列环素水平的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(20):3888-3891.
[26] SAARI T I,IHMSEN H,MELL J,et al.Influence of intensive care treatment on the protein binding of sufentanil and hydromorphone during pain therapy in postoperative cardiac surgery patients[J].Br J Anaesth,2014,113(4):677-687.

相似文献/References:

[1]焦明娜,霍红艳.氢吗啡酮复合右美托咪啶对老年腹腔镜胃肠道手术患者血流动力学、镇痛效果和不良反应的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2023,52(2):200.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.02.019]
　JIAO Mingna,HUO Hongyan.Effects of hydromorphone combined with dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics,analgesia and adverse reactions in elderly patients with laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery[J].,2023,52(10):200.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.02.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:陕西省科学技术项目(2023-YBSF-332); 西安市科技计划项目(22YXYJ0013)
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-08