[1]杨祥宝,潘引鹏,戴建华.剑突下入路单孔胸腔镜与三孔胸腔镜纵隔肿瘤切除术临床疗效对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2023,52(8):1010-1013.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.08.015]
　YANG Xiangbao,PAN Yinpeng,DAI Jianhua.Clinical comparison of single-port thoracoscopy and three-port thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection with subxiphoid approach[J].,2023,52(8):1010-1013.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.08.015]
点击复制

剑突下入路单孔胸腔镜与三孔胸腔镜纵隔肿瘤切除术临床疗效对比研究
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
52
期数:
2023年8期
页码:
1010-1013
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical comparison of single-port thoracoscopy and three-port thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection with subxiphoid approach
作者:
杨祥宝; 潘引鹏; 戴建华
(连云港市第一人民医院胸外科,江苏 连云港 222000)
Author(s):
YANG Xiangbao; PAN Yinpeng; DAI Jianhua
(Department of Thoracic Surgery,the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang,Lianyungang 222000,China)
关键词:
剑突下入路;  单孔胸腔镜;  三孔胸腔镜;  纵隔肿瘤切除术;  致痛介质;  并发症
Keywords:
Subxiphoid approach;  Single-port thoracoscopy;  Three-port thoracoscopy;  Mediastinal tumor resection;  Pain-causing mediators;  Complication
分类号:
R 734.5
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.08.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:对比研究剑突下入路单孔胸腔镜纵隔肿瘤切除术与三孔胸腔镜纵隔肿瘤切除术的临床应用效果。方法:选取接受胸腔镜纵隔肿瘤切除术的59例患者,根据手术方式不同分为两组,观察组采用剑突下入路单孔胸腔镜纵隔肿瘤切除术,对照组采用传统三孔胸腔镜纵隔肿瘤切除术; 观察两组围手术期指标、血清致痛介质水平及术后并发症情况。结果:观察组术中出血量、术后镇痛次数均少于对照组,术后引流时间、住院时间均短于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05); 两组术后血清缓激肽(BK)、5-羟色胺(5-HT)、神经肽Y(NPY)和前列腺素E2(PGE2)等疼痛应激指标水平较术前显著升高,且对照组显著高于观察组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05); 两组术后并发症总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 两组术后5年累积无病生存率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:剑突下入路单孔胸腔镜纵隔肿瘤切除术相比传统三孔胸腔镜手术,具有术中出血少、术后疼痛轻、引流时间和住院时间短等优势,更益于患者术后恢复,是一种安全可行的手术方法。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical application effect of subxiphoid approach single-port thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection and three-port thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection.Methods:A total of 59 patients who underwent thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection were selected and divided into two groups according to different surgical methods.The observation group underwent single-port thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection with subxiphoid approach,and the control group underwent traditional three-port thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection.The perioperative indexes,serum pain-causing mediator levels and postoperative complications of the two groups were observed.Results:Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative analgesia times in the observation group were less than those in the control group,postoperative drainage time and hospitalization time were shorter than those in the control group(all P<0.05).The levels of pain stress indexes such as BK,5-HT,NPY and PGE2 in both groups were significantly increased after operation,and the control group was significantly higher than the observation group(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in 5-year cumulative disease-free survival between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared with traditional three-port thoracoscopic surgery,subxiphoid single-port thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection has the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding,light postoperative pain,short drainage time and hospital stay,etc.,which is more conducive to postoperative recovery and is a safe and feasible surgical method.

参考文献/References:

[1] Ruckert JC,Elsner A,Andreas MN.Mediastinale tumore[J].Zentralbl Chir,2022,147(1):99-120.
[2] Roden AC,Fang W,Shen Y,et al.Distribution of mediastinal lesions across multi-institutional,international,radiology databases[J].J Thorac Oncol,2020,15(4):568-579.
[3] 李 雄,刘 霞,马生茂,等.三种手术方式治疗前纵隔肿瘤的疗效对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(1):48-50,54.
[4] Leschber G.Video-assisted thoracic surgery:A global development[J].Chirurg,2018,89(3):185-190.
[5] 王庆淮,谭 宁.102例良性原发性纵隔肿瘤的治疗分析[J].中华胸部外科电子杂志,2020,7(1):36-39.
[6] 贺海奇,冯锦腾,范 坤,等.胸腔镜经剑突下与经侧胸入路行前纵隔肿瘤切除的早期效果比较[J].现代肿瘤医学,2020,28(15):2614-2617.
[7] Zhu X,Jin K,Wu X,Yu G.Clinical application of thoracoscopic resection of anterior mediastinal tumors under the xiphoid process[J].Biomed Res Int,2022,23:2012457.
[8] 冯 喆,高继东,郑明非,等.微创胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔肿瘤临床效果及对患者血浆中皮质醇、促肾上腺皮质激素浓度的影响研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(7):848-850,913.
[9] 赵士芳,王 平,刘金华,等.微创胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔肿瘤临床效果及血浆皮质醇和促肾上腺皮质激素水平变化的研究[J].中国医学装备,2020,17(8):95-99.
[10] 李根水,刘 建,陈 剑,等.单操作孔胸腔镜治疗纵隔肿瘤的临床疗效[J].安徽医学,2020,41(8):917-919.
[11] Mao Y,Lan Y,Cui F,et al.Comparison of different surgical approaches for anterior mediastinal tumor[J].J Thorac Dis,2020,12(10):5430-5439.
[12] Nagano H,Suda T,Ishizawa H,et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for ectopic mediastinal parathyroid tumor:Subxiphoid and lateral thoracic approach[J].J Thorac Dis,2019,11(7):2932-2938.
[13] 李晓亮,刘高华,刘蔡杨,等.不同入路胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤的临床疗效比较[J].成都医学院学报,2021,16(6):743-746.
[14] Yoshino O,Yamada-Nomoto K,Kobayashi M,et al.Bradykinin system is involved in endometriosis-related pain through endothelin-1 production[J].Eur J Pain,2018,22(3):501-510.
[15] 闫芍药,聂会勇,王锁良.加味双柏散外敷联合耳穴压豆对肝癌介入治疗患者疼痛评分及生活质量影响[J].陕西中医,2020,41(12):1763-1766.
[16] Gupta S,Gautam M,Prasoon P,et al.Involvement of neuropeptide Y in post-incisional nociception in rats[J].Ann Neurosci,2018,25(4):268-276.
[17] Chopra S,Giovanelli P,Alvarado-Vazquez PA,et al.IRE1α-XBP1 signaling in leukocytes controls prostaglandin biosynthesis and pain[J].Science,2019,365(6450):6499.
[18] Chen X,Ma Q,Wang X,et al.Subxiphoid and subcostal thoracoscopic surgical approach for thymectomy[J].Surg Endosc,2021,35(9):5239-5246.
[19] Li J,Qi G,Liu Y,et al.Meta-analysis of subxiphoid approach versus lateral approach for thoracoscopic Thymectomy[J].J Cardiothorac Surg,2020,15(1):89.
[20] Wang GW,Tao T,Li CK,et al.Comparison between thoracoscopic and open approaches in thymoma resection[J].J Thorac Dis,2019,11(10):4159-4168.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:江苏省卫生健康委员会医学科研项目(H21018098)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-08-07