[1]曹晓磊,顾 倩,邵 晶.显微外科手术不同入路对颅前窝底脑膜瘤患者肿瘤有效切除率、神经功能、并发症及生活质量的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2023,52(4):433-436.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.04.015]
　CAO Xiaolei,GU Qian,SHAO Jing.Effects of different approaches of microsurgery on effective tumor resection rate,neurological function,complications and quality of life in patients with anterior cranial fossa meningiomas[J].,2023,52(4):433-436.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.04.015]
点击复制

显微外科手术不同入路对颅前窝底脑膜瘤患者肿瘤有效切除率、神经功能、并发症及生活质量的影响
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
52
期数:
2023年4期
页码:
433-436
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2023-04-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different approaches of microsurgery on effective tumor resection rate,neurological function,complications and quality of life in patients with anterior cranial fossa meningiomas
作者:
曹晓磊; 顾 倩; 邵 晶
(复旦大学附属华山医院东院神经外科,上海 200040)
Author(s):
CAO Xiaolei; GU Qian; SHAO Jing
(Department of Neurosurgery,East Hospital of Huashan Hospital,Fudan University,Shanghai 200040,China)
关键词:
颅前窝底;  脑膜瘤;  肿瘤切除;  显微外科;  神经功能;  生活质量
Keywords:
Anterior cranial fossa;  Meningiomas;  Tumor resection;  Microsurgery;  Neurological function;  Quality of life
分类号:
R 739.41
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.04.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探究显微外科手术不同入路对脑膜瘤患者肿瘤有效切除率、神经功能、并发症及生活质量的影响。方法:选择90例颅前窝底脑膜瘤患者资料,根据入路方式分为观察组和对照组,对照组(n=43)行额下入路手术,观察组(n=47)行经眶-额窦入路手术,比较两组围手术期指标、肿瘤有效切除率、术后并发症。术后2、4周神经功能[格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、中文版癌症治疗功能评估-认知功能量表(FACT-Cog)]及生活质量[肿瘤患者卡氏(KPS)评分表]。结果:观察组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间均显著低于对照组(P<0.05); 观察组有效切除率为93.62%,显著高于对照组的79.07%(P<0.05); 观察组术后并发症率为8.51%,对照组为18.60%,比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); 与术前比较,两组术后2、4周GCS、FACT-Cog评分均显著升高(均P<0.05),观察组术后GCS、FACT-Cog评分显著高于对照组(均P<0.05);,两组术后1、3个月KPS评分显著升高(均P<0.05),观察组术后KPS评分显著高于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论:与额下入路比较,经眶-额窦入路具有术时短、创伤小、术后并发症少等优势,且肿瘤有效切除率更高,患者术后神经功能恢复快,整体生活质量更高。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effects of different microsurgical approaches on the effective tumor resection rate,neurological function,complications and quality of life in patients with meningiomas.Methods:The data of 90 patients with anterior cranial fossa meningiomas were retrospectively analyzed.According to the approaches,the patients were divided into observation group and control group.The control group(n=43)underwent subfrontal approach surgery,while the observation group(n=47)underwent transorbital-frontal sinus approach surgery.The perioperative indicators,effective tumor resection rate and postoperative complications as well as neurological function(GCS,FACT-Cog)and quality of life(KPS)at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery were compared between the two groups.Results:The surgical time,intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in observation group were significantly shorter or less than those in control group(all P<0.05).The effective resection rate in observation group was 93.62%,which was significantly higher than 79.07% in control group(P<0.05).The total incidence rate of postoperative complications was 8.51% in observation group and 18.60% in control group(P>0.05).Compared with before surgery,the GCS score and FACT-Cog score of the two groups were significantly increased at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery,and the scores in observation group after surgery were significantly higher than those in control group(all P<0.05).The KPS scores of both groups at 1 month and 3 months after surgery were significantly enhanced,and the KPS scores in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group after surgery(all P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with subfrontal approach,transorbital-frontal sinus approach has the advantages of shorter surgical time,smaller trauma,fewer postoperative complications,higher effective tumor resection rate,faster postoperative neurological function recovery and higher overall quality of life.

参考文献/References:

[1] 吴国培,唐永峰,陈宋育.眶上外侧入路与额底入路在颅前窝底脑膜瘤切除手术中的应用[J].广西医科大学学报,2021,38(8):1599-1603.
[2] 周跃飞,伊西才,赵全成,等.经鼻内镜前颅底巨大脑膜瘤手术及颅底重建研究[J].临床神经外科杂志,2020,17(6):611-615,620.
[3] 文江力,冷海斌,王年华,等.颅前窝底脑膜瘤的显微外科治疗[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(2):110-112.
[4] 杨丽丰,苗 伟,刘 宇.小型扩展双额入路手术治疗颅前窝底中线脑膜瘤[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2021,26(9):710-711.
[5] 沈 育,徐春林,陈 鑫,等.窦镰旁脑膜瘤的显微外科手术治疗效果及预后影响因素分析[J].临床误诊误治,2021,34(8):47-51.
[6] 胡志刚,王汉东,潘云曦,等.经枕下中线入路切除枕骨大孔区腹侧脑膜瘤的临床疗效[J].中华神经外科杂志,2020,36(1):26-28.
[7] 冯志铁,杨金理,黄开让,等.乙状窦后入路术式对岩骨后脑膜瘤患者的疗效[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2020,15(11):664-665,672.
[8] 谷春雨,乔 栎,王浩然,等.颞下经岩骨嵴入路切除岩斜区脑膜瘤[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2020,25(7):318-319.
[9] 郭烈美,徐天启,高卫真,等.经眶-额窦入路切除前颅底中线区脑膜瘤[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2018,24(4):303-308.
[10] 杨铁牛,李 佳,杨金亮,等.显微外科手术治疗颅内脑膜瘤疗效分析[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2020,24(2):122-126.
[11] 余 菲,张 琳.格拉斯哥昏迷-瞳孔反应评分在ICU重型颅脑损伤患者中的临床应用价值[J].临床与病理杂志,2019,39(1):104-109.
[12] 李三中,王 凯,孙季冬,等.中颅窝底脑膜瘤的临床特点及手术治疗研究[J].临床神经外科杂志,2020,17(3):273-277.
[13] 曹宏斌.神经外科手术治疗脑肿瘤出血临床研究[J].陕西中医,2021,42(S1):9.
[14] 党连锋,杨 春.术前栓塞联合经对侧纵裂入路术治疗巨大镰窦旁脑膜瘤疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(8):982-985,1020.
[15] 顾 昕,冯 睿,朱伟一,等.不同手术入路治疗岩斜区脑膜瘤的效果分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2019,18(8):856-859.
[16] 高 峰,杨 乐,麦麦提依明?托合提,等.经单侧额下入路显微手术切除嗅沟脑膜瘤效果观察[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2022,34(2):142-145.
[17] 廖 云,盛敏峰,王中勇,等.神经内镜下经额锁孔入路与显微镜下经颞锁孔入路手术治疗基底节区脑出血的疗效比较[J].中华神经医学杂志,2021,20(11):1124-1129.
[18] 忠 波,刘 文,常 富,等.小骨窗经额入路显微镜下清除原发性重型脑室出血的临床分析[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2020,33(2):122-125.
[19] 赵朝辉,钟兴明,汪一棋,等.眶上外侧入路视神经管减压术治疗创伤性视神经损伤的疗效[J].中华创伤杂志,2020,36(6):531-535.
[20] 续 岭,谢明国,孙飞吉,等.神经内镜经鼻蝶入路和经颅内镜眶上外侧入路切除鞍结节脑膜瘤[J].临床神经外科杂志,2020,17(3):268-272.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:上海市卫生健康委员会科研课题(202040069); 复旦大学附属华山医院科研启动基金资助项目(20132028)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-04-06