[1]王幼娥,周喜英,王颛婷.子宫腺肌病临床病理特征及经阴道三维超声定量测量诊断价值[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(11):1393-1396.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.11.017]
　WANG You'e,ZHOU Xiying,WANG Zhuanting.Clinicopathological features of adenomyosis and diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound quantitative measurement[J].,2022,51(11):1393-1396.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.11.017]
点击复制

子宫腺肌病临床病理特征及经阴道三维超声定量测量诊断价值
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
51
期数:
2022年11期
页码:
1393-1396
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinicopathological features of adenomyosis and diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound quantitative measurement
作者:
王幼娥1; 周喜英1; 王颛婷2
(1.西安高新医院超声医学科,陕西 西安 710075; 2.西电集团医院超声医学科,陕西 西安 710077)
Author(s):
WANG You'e; ZHOU Xiying; WANG Zhuanting
(Department of Ultrasound Medicine,Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital,Xi'an 710075,China)
关键词:
子宫腺肌病;  经阴道三维超声;  血管化指数;  血流指数;  子宫动脉血流量;  搏动指数
Keywords:
Adenomyosis;  Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound;  Vascularization index;  Blood flow index;  Uterine artery blood flow volume;  Pulsatility index
分类号:
R 711.71
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.11.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探究子宫腺肌病临床病理特征及经阴道三维超声定量测量的诊断价值。方法:以80例疑似子宫腺肌病患者为研究对象,根据病理或手术结果分为子宫腺肌病组(n=36)、非子宫腺肌病组(n=44)。分析子宫腺肌病患者的临床病理特征,探究经阴道三维超声对子宫腺肌病的诊断价值,比较两组患者三维超声定量指标[血管化指数(VI)、血流指数(FI)、血管化血流指数(VFI)]、血流超声参数[子宫动脉血流量(BFV)、阻力指数(RI)、搏动指数(PI)]水平的差异,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线探究存在统计学差异的上述指标对子宫腺肌病的诊断效能。结果:36例患者经病理或手术结果诊断为子宫腺肌病,子宫腺肌病类型以弥漫性(69.44%)为主,超声征象主要以子宫增大(75.00%)、肌壁线衰减/栅栏状(72.22%)、肌层回声增粗不均匀(63.89%)为主; 经阴道三维超声诊断子宫腺肌病的准确率为83.75%,灵敏度为86.11%,特异度为81.82%,阳性预测值为79.49%,阴性预测值为87.80%; 子宫腺肌病组VI、FI、VFI、BFV、PI水平均高于非子宫腺肌病组,RI低于非子宫腺肌病组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05); ROC曲线结果显示,VI、FI、VFI、BFV、RI、PI对子宫腺肌病的诊断效能均较高(AUC=0.921、0.768、0.842、0.925、0.788、0.805,均P<0.05)。结论:经阴道三维超声定量测量可客观分析子宫腺肌病血供、血流情况,能为诊断子宫腺肌病提供一定参考价值。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinicopathological features of adenomyosis and the diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound quantitative measurement.Methods:A total of 80 patients with suspected adenomyosis were selected as the research subjects.According to pathological or surgical results,the patients were divided into adenomyosis group(36 cases)and non-adenomyosis group(44 cases).The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with adenomyosis were analyzed,and the value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of adenomyosis were explored.The three-dimensional ultrasound quantitative indicators [Vascularization Index(VI),Blood Flow Index(FI),Vascularization Flow Index(VFI)]and ultrasound parameters of blood flow [uterine artery blood flow volume(BFV),Resistance Index(RI),Pulsatility Index(PI)]were compared between the two groups.ROC curve was used to explore the diagnostic efficiency of the above indicators with significant differences for adenomyosis.Results:Thirty-six patients were diagnosed with adenomyosis by pathological or surgical results.The type of adenomyosis was mainly diffuse(69.44%),and the ultrasound signs were mainly enlarged uterus(75.00%),muscle wall attenuation/palisade shape(72.22%)and uneven thickening of myometrial echoes(63.89%).The accuracy rate,sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of adenomyosis were 83.75%,86.11%,81.82%,79.49% and 87.80%.The VI,FI,VFI,BFV and PI of the adenomyosis group were higher than those of the non-adenomyosis group,while the RI was lower than that of the non-adenomyosis group(all P<0.05).ROC curve results showed that VI,FI,VFI,BFV,RI and PI had high diagnostic efficiency for adenomyosis(AUC=0.921,0.768,0.842,0.925,0.788,0.805,all P<0.05).Conclusion:Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound quantitative measurement can objectively analyze the blood supply and blood flow of adenomyosis,and can provide a certain reference value for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.

参考文献/References:

[1] Moawad G,Kheil MH,Ayoubi JM,et al.Adenomyosis and infertility[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2022,39(5):1027-1031.
[2] 陈亚杰,闻 姬.子宫内膜异位症中西医认识及治疗研究进展[J].陕西中医,2021,42(10):1486-1489.
[3] 张晓勇.宫腔镜辅助下分段诊刮术与单纯分段诊刮术诊断子宫内膜癌价值比较[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,48(8):1045-1048.
[4] Poon J,Leung JT,Leung DY.3D echo in routine clinical practice-state of the art in 2019[J].Heart Lung Circ,2019,28(9):1400-1410.
[5] Ptru CL,Cernea N,Capitanescu RG,et al.3D and 2D ultrasound evaluation of the uterine corpus:Normal appearances and common pitfalls[J].J Biol Regul Homeost Agents,2020,34(3):1001-1005.
[6] Marques ALS,Andres MP,Mattos LA,et al.Association of 2D and 3D transvaginal ultrasound findings with adenomyosis in symptomatic women of reproductive age:A prospective study[J].Clinics(Sao Paulo),2021,76:2981.
[7] Rasmussen CK,Hansen ES,Ernst E,et al.Two-and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for diagnosis of adenomyosis of the inner myometrium[J].Reprod Biomed Online,2019,38(5):750-760.
[8] Stratopoulou CA,Donnez J,Dolmans MM.Conservative management of uterine adenomyosis:Medical vs.Surgical Approach[J].J Clin Med,2021,10(21):4878.
[9] 赵 娜,周灵雪,杨向荣.桂枝茯苓胶囊联合戈舍瑞林对子宫内膜异位症患者子宫动脉血流动力学及Th1/Th2细胞因子的影响[J].陕西中医,2022,43(4):446-449.
[10] Lacheta J.Uterine adenomyosis:Pathogenesis,diagnostics,symptomatology and treatment[J].Ceska Gynekol,2019,84(3):240-246.
[11] 芦 霄,秦海英,张 悦,等.超声引导下微创消融治疗子宫腺肌症疗效评估[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(1):32-35.
[12] Chapron C,Vannuccini S,Santulli P,et al.Diagnosing adenomyosis:An integrated clinical and imaging approach[J].Hum Reprod Update,2020,26(3):392-411.
[13] Bordonne C,Puntonet J,Maitrot-Mantelet L,et al.Imaging for evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis[J].Minerva Obstet Gynecol,2021,73(3):290-303.
[14] Grigore M,Popovici R,Himiniuc LM,et al.The added value of three-dimensional ultrasonography in uterine pathology[J].Exp Ther Med,2021,22(5):1261.
[15] Donnez J,Stratopoulou CA,Dolmans MM.Uterine adenomyosis:From disease pathogenesis to a new medical approach using gnrh antagonists[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021,18(19):9941.
[16] Emmanuel I,Ochigbo A,Philip A,et al.Adenomyosis:A clinico-pathological study[J].West Afr J Med,2019,36(1):88-92.
[17] Rasmussen CK,Hansen ES,Dueholm M.Inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by 2- and 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography[J].J Ultrasound Med,2019,38(3):657-666.
[18] 赵 宁,胡晓康,车德红,等.子宫腺肌瘤鉴别诊断中经腹部彩色多普勒超声的应用及有效性分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(23):5581-5583.
[19] 刘文君,潘锦芳,杨 娜.三维彩色多普勒超声在子宫腺肌病临床诊断中的应用[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(11):2674-2677.
[20] 王晓燕,李小飞,马英超.经阴道彩色多普勒超声定量参数对宫颈癌患者的诊断和临床价值分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2020,28(16):2861-2865.
[21] 刘三英,高晓艳,王 旭.三维多普勒超声评估卵巢储备降低女性的卵巢功能的价值研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2020,19(20):2234-2238.
[22] 胡振芳,张金辉.阴道三维能量多普勒超声血管参数在子宫瘢痕妊娠治疗中的临床意义研究[J].中国性科学,2020,29(8):36-38.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-09