[1]夏东琴,张 宏,赵 洁,等.实时三维腔内超声诊断剖宫产瘢痕妊娠临床研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(8):966-969.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.08.014]
　XIA Dongqin,ZHANG Hong,ZHAO Jie,et al.Application value of real-time three-dimensional intracavitary ultrasound in diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy[J].,2022,51(8):966-969.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.08.014]
点击复制

实时三维腔内超声诊断剖宫产瘢痕妊娠临床研究

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
51
期数:
2022年8期
页码:
966-969
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application value of real-time three-dimensional intracavitary ultrasound in diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy
作者:
夏东琴; 张 宏; 赵 洁; 郑 瑜
(西安交通大学附属西安市中心医院,陕西 西安710004)
Author(s):
XIA Dongqin; ZHANG Hong; ZHAO Jie; ZHENG Yu
(Xi'an Central Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710004,China)
关键词:
剖宫产瘢痕妊娠;  诊断;  实时三维腔内超声;  三维彩色血流成像;  分型;  应用价值
Keywords:
Cesarean scar pregnancy;  Diagnosin;  Real-time three-dimensional intracavitary ultrasound;  Three-dimensional color blood flow imaging;  Typing;  Application value
分类号:
R 445.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.08.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨实时三维腔内超声在诊断早期剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)中的应用价值。方法:选取经手术及病理证实的78例CSP患者,术前均行二维、三维腔内超声检查,观察并分析CSP的二维声像图表现和三维成像特征,以手术病理结果为金标准,比较二维、三维腔内超声对CSP的诊断准确率。结果:二维与三维腔内超声在显示妊娠组织与瘢痕关系、滋养血流来源上比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),并且经三维腔内超声测量的瘢痕处肌层厚度较二维腔内超声更接近于术后病理测量结果。三维腔内超声诊断CSP的准确率为93.59%(73/78),高于二维腔内超声检查的78.21%(61/78)(χ2=7.620,P<0.05)。在不同类型CSP中,三维腔内超声对CSP Ⅰ型和CSP Ⅳ型(包块型)的诊断准确率高于二维腔内超声(P<0.05); 二维、三维腔内超声对CSP Ⅱ型和CSP Ⅲ型的诊断准确率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:实时三维超声腔内超声提供了一种新的显像方式,能更直观、立体地显示妊娠组织与子宫瘢痕的空间位置关系、侵入肌壁的程度及滋养血供来源和分布,客观、精准地测量子宫瘢痕处肌层厚度,对CSP的早期诊断具有较高的准确性和可靠性,尤其是对CSP Ⅰ型和CSP Ⅳ型的诊断具有显著优势。
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the value of real-time three-dimensional(3D)intracavitary ultrasound in the diagnosis of early cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP).Methods:A total of 78 patients with CSP confirmed by surgery and pathology were selected and underwent two-dimensional(2D)and 3D intracavitary ultrasound examination before operation.The 2D sonographic representation and 3D imaging characteristics of CSP were observed and analyzed.The diagnostic accuracy of 2D and 3D intracavitary ultrasound for CSP was compared with the surgical and pathological results as the gold standard.Results:There were statistically significant differences between 2D and 3D intracavitary ultrasound in the relationship between pregnancy tissue and scar and the source of nourishing blood flow(P<0.05),and the thickness of muscle layer at scar measured by 3D intracavitary ultrasound was closer to the results of surgical pathological measurement than that measured by 2D intracavitary ultrasound.The accuracy of 3D intracavitary ultrasound in CSP diagnosis was 93.59%(73/78),which was higher than 78.21%(61/78)of 2D intracavitary ultrasound(P<0.05).Among different types of CSP,the diagnostic accuracy of 3D intracavitary ultrasound was higher than that of 2D intracavitary ultrasound for CSP type Ⅰ and CSP type Ⅳ(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of CSP type Ⅱ and CSP type Ⅲ by 2D and 3D intracavitary ultrasound(all P>0.05).Conclusion:Real-time three-dimensional intracavitary ultrasound provides a new way of imaging,which can more intuitively and stereoscopically show the spatial relationship between pregnancy tissue and uterine scar,the degree of invasion of muscle wall,and the source and distribution of nourishing blood supply,objectively and accurately measure the myometrial thickness of uterine scar,and has high accuracy and reliability for early diagnosis of CSP.In particular,there are significant advantages in the diagnosis of CSP type Ⅰ and CSP type Ⅳ(mass type).

参考文献/References:

[1] Kathopoulis N,Chatzipapas L,Samartzis K,et al.Laparoscopic m anagementof cesarean scar pregnancy:Report of two cases with video-presentation of differentoperative techniques and literature review[J].J Gynecol Obstet Hum,2021,50(8):120-123.
[2] 王春雨,韩 冰,赵亚丹,等.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠不同分娩方式近远期并发症比较[J].实用妇产科杂志,2020,36(1):53-57.
[3] Gulino FA,Ettore C,Ettore G.A review on management of caesarean scar pregnancy[J].Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2021,33(5):400-404.
[4] 唐希阳,史安平,周永强,等.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗研究进展[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,48(8):1102-1105.
[5] Zhang Y,Zhang Z,Liu X,et al.Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy:A systematie review and meta-analysis[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet,2021,303(2):321-328.
[6] Brar R,Saha PK,Bagga R.Termination of pregnancy may notbe the only option for women diagnosed with live caesarean scar pregnancy atan early gestation:Lights and shadows[J].Aus Nz J Obstet Gyn,2020,60(6):147-149.
[7] 刘瑞明,温道清.经阴道三维超声对剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(19):3695-3698.
[8] 陈志妍,彭巍炜,黄伟俊.经阴道三维超声、断层超声显像技术诊断早期异位妊娠临床研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2018,47(8):990-993.
[9] 中华医学会妇产科学分会计划生育学组.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(8):568-572.
[10] Society for Maternalfetal Medicine(SMFM),Miller R,Timor IE,et al.Society for maternal-fetal medicine(SMFM)consult series 49:Cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2020,222(5):12-14.
[11] 孔子珍,刘 俊,俞红英.彩色多普勒超声在CSP早期诊断及治疗中的应用价值分析[J].中国医学装备,2018,15(10):1167-1170.
[12] 朱亚芳,谭乳燕,解左平,等.超声联合MRI诊断剖宫产后子宫切口瘢痕处妊娠的价值研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2021,37(2):190-193.
[13] 熊明涛,王亚梅,王 慧,等.不同超声分型剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的预后分析[J].中国超声医学杂志,2019,35(11):1027-1029.
[14] Lin SY,Hsieh CJ,Tu YA,et al.New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies:An observational cohort study[J].PLoS One,2018,13(8):202020.
[15] 刘亚静,石辛景,陈莉茹,等.MRI、超声测量瘢痕妊娠的瘢痕厚度与病理测量结果的相关性[J].放射学实践,2020,35(9):1161-1165.
[16] 陈春鸿.经阴道三维超声诊断剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的效果分析[J].现代实用医学,2017,29(6):745-746.
[17] Wang Y,Niu Z,Tao L,et al.Early intervention for heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy to preserve intrauterine pregnancy may improve outcomes:A retrospective cohort study[J].Reprod Biomed Online,2020,41(2):290-299.
[18] 田媛媛,赵 萍,刘 鸽,等.经阴道二维联合三维超声对剖宫产后子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2021,37(9):1043-1046.
[19] 刘 洁,崔稳丽,柴义青.三维彩超在评估剖宫产后子宫瘢痕部位妊娠中的应用[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2018,29(2):118-120.
[20] 宁浩杰,韦德湛,谢宏基,等.经阴道三维超声对剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的早期预测价值[J].中国现代医学杂志,2020,30(11):1169-1173.

相似文献/References:

[1]王双龙,于 美,吕 镔,等.声脉冲辐射力成像定量评估兔肝缺血再灌注损伤实验研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(2):140.
　WANG Shuanglong,YU Mei,LV Bin,et al.Quantitative assessment of hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury with acoustic radiation force impulse in rabbit[J].,2020,49(8):140.
[2]陈 爽.不同彩色多普勒超声检查方式在异位妊娠早期诊断中的应用研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(2):154.
　CHEN Shuang..Application of different color Doppler ultrasonography in early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy[J].,2020,49(8):154.
[3]刘永收,张 媛,秦 梅,等.手环血氧仪在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征诊断中的应用[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(2):176.
　LIU Yongshou,ZHANG Yuan,QIN Mei,et al.Application of wearable reflex oximeter in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome[J].,2020,49(8):176.
[4]宋亚邛,胡海燕△.VEGF、TGF-β1、CA19-9、CA242和DKK1联合检测对早期胰腺癌临床诊断价值研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(2):237.
　SONG Yaqiong,HU Haiyan..Clinical value analysis of combined examination of VEGF,TGF-β1,CA19-9,CA242 and DKK1 in patients with early pancreatic cancer[J].,2020,49(8):237.
[5]郭晓波,蔺 京,来春艳,等.新型冠状病毒与实时荧光RT-PCR核酸检测*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(3):264.
[6]王 琪,卢朝祥△,陈晓峰,等.预测6月龄以下骶尾部畸胎瘤良恶性的列线图建立研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(3):313.
　WANG Qi,LU Chaoxiang,CHEN Xiaofeng,et al.Establishment of anomogram for predicting benign and malignant sacrococcygeal teratomas below 6 months[J].,2020,49(8):313.
[7]王迎春,孔延亮,蔚文祥,等.家庭聚集性新型冠状病毒肺炎患者初次就诊临床检验与CT特征分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(4):392.
　WANG Yingchun,KONG Yanliang,WEI Wenxiang,et al.Laboratory examination and CT features of family aggregative corona virus disease 2019 patients at first visit[J].,2020,49(8):392.
[8]杨自华,郭平学,王西辉,等.miRNA-244与miRNA-328在胆管癌患者血清中的表达及意义*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(5):549.
　YANG Zihua,GUO Pingxue,WANG Xihui,et al.Expression and significance of miRNA-244 and miRNA-328 in serum of patients with cholangiocarcinoma[J].,2020,49(8):549.
[9]王双龙,吕 镔△,李 龙,等.超声造影参数成像在甲状腺微小乳头状癌鉴别诊断中的应用价值*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(5):599.
　WANG Shuanglong,LV Bin,LI Long,et al.The value of parametric imaging of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of papillary thyroidmicrocarcinoma[J].,2020,49(8):599.
[10]权浩浩,于小勇,程小红,等.血清抗M型磷脂酶A2受体抗体检测在膜性肾病诊断中的价值研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(6):755.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2020.06.029]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:陕西省科学技术研究发展计划项目(2021SF-260)
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-04