[1]张闪闪,刘 鹏,梁 赟,等.患者自控新型电子评分器在术后恶心呕吐评估中的应用[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(8):961-965,977.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.08.013]
　ZHANG Shanshan,LIU Peng,LIANG Yun,et al.Application effect of new patient-controlled electronic scoring device in assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting[J].,2022,51(8):961-965,977.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.08.013]
点击复制

患者自控新型电子评分器在术后恶心呕吐评估中的应用
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
51
期数:
2022年8期
页码:
961-965,977
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application effect of new patient-controlled electronic scoring device in assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting
作者:
张闪闪1; 刘 鹏1; 梁 赟1; 高 巍2; 弥楷博2; 高子军3; 董补怀3
(1.西安医学院,陕西 西安 710068; 2.西安交通大学第一附属医院麻醉科,陕西 西安 710061; 3.西安交通大学附属红会医院麻醉科,陕西 西安 710054)
Author(s):
ZHANG Shanshan; LIU Peng; LIANG Yun; GAO Wei; MI Kaibo; GAO Zijun; DONG Buhuai
(Xi'an Medical University,Xi'an 710068,China)
关键词:
患者自控新型电子评分器;  纸质版视觉模拟评分;  术后恶心呕吐;  评估;  补救性止吐药;  满意度
Keywords:
New patient-controlled electronic scoring device;  Paper-based visual analog score;  Postoperative nausea and vomiting;  Assessment;  Remedial antiemetic;  Satisfaction
分类号:
R 694.7
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2022.08.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探索患者自控新型电子评分器在术后恶心呕吐评估中的应用效果,为优化术后恶心呕吐的评估提供新方法。方法:选取全麻下行腹腔镜非胃肠手术的患者作为本次的研究对象,并采用随机计算机法将患者分为两组,电子组(n=600)使用患者自控新型电子评分器,纸质组(n=600)使用常规纸质版视觉模拟评分。比较经两种评分方法评估患者的首次恶心呕吐时间、首次恶心呕吐评分、术后24 h内呕吐次数、术后补救性止吐药物的应用率以及患者对使用两种评分器的满意度。结果:电子组的首次恶心呕吐时间明显早于纸质组(P<0.05),并且电子组首次呕吐评分低于纸质组(P<0.05),术后24 h内呕吐次数高于纸质组(P<0.05),电子组评估的工作效率明显高于纸质组(P<0.05),电子组术后24 h内补救性止吐药应用率少于纸质组(P<0.05),而患者使用电子评分器满意度评分高于纸质组(P<0.05)。结论:使用患者自控新型电子评分器能够及时发现患者恶心呕吐的情况,及时给予有效的救治,减少术后补救性止吐药的应用,使得患者就医满意度更高,对患者的临床救治工作具有重要的应用价值。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the application effect of new patient-controlled electronic scoring device in the assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting,and to provide a new method for optimizing the evaluation of postoperative nausea and vomiting.Methods:Patients undergoing laparoscopic non-gastrointestinal surgery under general anesthesia were selected as the subjects of this study,and they were divided into two groups by random computer method.Electronic group(600 cases)received new patient-controlled electronic scoring device for patients control,and paper group(600 cases)used conventional paper-based visual analog score. The time of first nausea and vomiting,first nausea and vomiting score,number of vomiting and application rate of remedial antiemetic drugs in 24 hours after surgery and patient satisfaction with the use of both evaluator were compared between the two groups.Results:The time of first nausea and vomiting in the electronic group was significantly earlier than that in the paper group,and the score of first vomiting in the electronic group was lower than that in the paper group,and the number of vomiting in the electronic group was higher than that in the paper group(all P<0.05).The evaluation efficiency of the electronic group was significantly higher than that in the paper group(P<0.05).The application rate of remedial antiemetic drugs within 24 hours after surgery in the electronic group was lower than that in the paper group(P<0.05),while the satisfaction score of patients using electronic evaluator was higher than that in the paper group(P<0.05).Conclusion: The use of new patient-controlled electronic scoring device can timely find the situation of patients with nausea and vomiting,timely provide effective treatment,reduce the application of postoperative remedial antiemetic drugs,make patients more satisfied with medical treatment,which has important application value for the clinical treatment of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1] Rusch D,Eberhart L,Wallenborn J,et al.Nausea and vomiting after surgery under general anesthesia:An evidence-based review concerning risk assessment,prevention,and treatment[J].Dtsch Arztebl Int,2010,107(42):733-741.
[2] Habib A,Gan T.Postoperative nausea and vomiting:Then & now[J].Anesth Analg,2012,115(3):493-495.
[3] Gan TJ,Belani KG,Bergese S,et al.Fourth consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting[J].Anesth Analg,2020,131(2):411-448.
[4] 权 翔,叶铁虎.术后恶心呕吐的风险评估及防治方法[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2007,28(3):253-256.
[5] Apfel C,Kranke P,Greim C,et al.What can be expected from risk scores for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting?[J].Brit J Anaesth,2001,86(6):822-827.
[6] Phillips C,Brookes CD,Rich J,et al.Postoperative nausea and vomiting following orthognathic surgery[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2015,44(6):745-751.
[7] Obrink E,Jildenstal P,Oddby E,et al.Post-operative nausea and vomiting:Update on predicting the probability and ways to minimize its occurrence,with focus on ambulatory surgery[J].Int J Surg,2015,15:100-106.
[8] Cao X,White PF,Ma H.An update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting[J].J Anesth,2017,31(4):617-626.
[9] May M,Junghaenel D,Ono M,et al.Ecological momentary assessment methodology in chronic pain research:A systematic review[J].J Pain,2018,19(7):699-716.
[10] Stone A,Shiffman S,Schwartz J,et al.Patient non-compliance with paper diaries[J].BMJ,2002,324(7347):1193-1194.
[11] Stinson JN,Jibb LA,Lalloo C,et al.Comparison of average weekly pain using recalled paper and momentary assessment electronic diary reports in children with arthritis[J].The Clinical Journal of Pain,2014,30(12):1044-1050.
[12] Robert T.Evaluation of a standardized internet-based and telephone-based patient monitoring system for pain therapy with transdermal fentanyl[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,2007,23(9):804-811.
[13] Marcano BJ,Jamsek J,Huckvale K,et al.Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods[J].Cochrane Db Syst Rev,2015,25(7):42.
[14] Suso-Ribera C,Castilla D,Zaragoza I,et al.Validity,reliability,feasibility,and usefulness of pain monitor:A multidimensional smartphone app for daily monitoring of adults with heterogenous chronic pain[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,2018,34(10):900-908.
[15] Robinson D.Hand-held computers in clinical audit[J].Senior Nurse,1993,13(3):14-17.
[16] Hofstedt O,Giuseppe D,Alenius GM,et al.Comparison of agreement between internet-based registration of patient-reported outcomes and clinic-based paper forms within the swedish rheumatology quality register[J].Scand J Rheumatol,2019,48(4):326-330.
[17] 钟纯兰,张玉清,陈小颂,等.自创新型疼痛评估笔在临床中的应用效果[J].黑龙江医学,2020,33(4):973-975.
[18] 黄晓佳,曹 勇,孟金成.化疗所致恶心呕吐的中西医治疗探讨[J].陕西中医,2009,30(9):571-573.
[19] 安政庄,杨宗林,张玉勤.昂丹司琼预防丁丙诺啡术后静脉镇痛所致恶心呕吐临床观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2015,44(9):1220-1222.
[20] 王瑛琦,汪小海,陈 洁,等.全身麻醉手术中预防性使用止吐药物发生恶心呕吐的危险因素分析[J].药物与临床研究,2022,30(1):76-80.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助面上项目(81971290); 西安市科技计划项目[20YXYJ0004(6),21YXYJ0025]
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-04