[1]董建彬,刘 鹏.关节镜辅助下切开复位内固定治疗对SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折临床疗效、骨折愈合及患者AOFAS评分的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(10):1242-1245.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.10.016]
 DONG Jianbin,LIU Peng.Effect of arthroscopy-assisted open reduction and internal fixation on clinical efficacy,fracture healing and AOFAS ankle-hind foot function score in patients with calcaneal fractures at Sanders type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ[J].,2021,50(10):1242-1245.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.10.016]
点击复制

关节镜辅助下切开复位内固定治疗对SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折临床疗效、骨折愈合及患者AOFAS评分的影响

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
50
期数:
2021年10期
页码:
1242-1245
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of arthroscopy-assisted open reduction and internal fixation on clinical efficacy,fracture healing and AOFAS ankle-hind foot function score in patients with calcaneal fractures at Sanders type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ
作者:
董建彬1刘 鹏2
(1.榆林市第一医院骨科,陕西 榆林 719000; 2.榆林市第一医院手足显微外科,陕西 榆林 719000)
Author(s):
DONG JianbinLIU Peng
(Department of Osteology,the First Hospital of Yulin,Yulin 719000,China)
关键词:
跟骨骨折 关节镜 切开复位内固定 Sanders分型 踝-后足功能评分
Keywords:
Calcaneal fracture Arthroscopy Open reduction and internal fixation Sanders classification Ankle-hind foot function score
分类号:
R 683
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.10.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨关节镜辅助下切开复位内固定治疗对SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折患者临床疗效、骨折愈合及美国足踝骨科学会踝-后足功能评分(AOFAS)的影响。方法:回顾性分析进行手术治疗的180例跟骨骨折患者的临床资料,根据不同的手术方案分为对照组(n=90)与观察组(n=90),对照组采取传统切开复位内固定术,观察组采取关节镜辅助下切开复位固定术,比较两组患者围手术指标、临床疗效及并发症发生情况。结果:观察组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及骨折愈合时间等各项指标优于对照组(均P<0.05); 术后对照组优良率为61.11%; 观察组优良率为84.44%,观察组患者的临床疗效好于对照组(P<0.05); 观察组并发症发生率(3.33%)较低于对照组(12.22%,P<0.05)。结论:关节镜辅助下切开复位固定术不仅能缩短Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折患者的手术时长及愈合时间,还可降低患者术中出血量及术后并发症发生率,较传统手术而言具有一定的优势。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of arthroscopy-assisted open reduction and internal fixation on the clinical efficacy,fracture healing and AOFAS ankle-hind foot function score in patients with calcaneal fractures at Sanders type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ.Methods:The clinical data of 180 patients with calcaneal fractures underwent surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed.According to different treatments,they were divided into control group(n=90)and observation group(n=90).The control group was treated with traditional open reduction and internal fixation.The observation group was treated with arthroscopy-assisted open reduction and internal fixation.The perioperative indexes,clinical efficacy and complications of the two groups were compared.Results:The operation time,intraoperative blood loss and fracture healing time of the observation group were better than those of the control group(all P<0.05).The postoperative excellent and good rate of control group and observation group was 61.11% and 84.44%,and the clinical efficacy of the observation group was better than that of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group(3.33%)was lower than that in the control group(12.22%)(P<0.05).Conclusion:Arthroscopy-assisted open reduction and internal fixation can not only shorten the operation time and healing time of patients with Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures,but also reduce intraoperative blood loss and the incidence of postoperative complications.Compared with traditional surgery,it has some advantages.

参考文献/References:

[1] 孙 勃,刘士波,王 培,等.撬拨复位结合Ilizarov技术与切开复位内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的疗效比较[J].现代医学,2019,47(6):663-667.
[2] 盛 伟,林 敏.L形外侧扩大入路与跗骨窦间隙入路分别联合关节镜辅助下复位内固定在Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折手术中的临床应用[J].河北医学,2018,23(7):1161-1165.
[3] 廖文利,何久盛,曹立峰.经皮撬拨复位空心螺钉与切开复位钢板内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2019,21(4):315-316.
[4] 王加利,宋飞远,陈仲华,等.距下关节镜辅助下联合牵开器、复位器微创治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2020,22(1):20-26.
[5] 陈 斌,张 焱,穆 帅,等.经皮与切开复位内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的对比[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2019,27(14):1274-1278.
[6] Tuckett P,Hope M,Tetsworth K,et al.Transarticular tibiotalocalcaneal nailing versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of the elderly ankle fracture:Protocol for a multicentre,prospective,randomised controlled trial[J].Bmj Open,2019,9(1):433-435.
[7] 陈姚飞,黄 新.经皮微创和切开复位内固定治疗SandersⅠ、Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的临床疗效比较[J].医学综述,2019,25(22):431-433.
[8] 陈如孙.经跗骨窦微创切开复位联合结合型跟骨解剖板内固定治疗跟骨SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(6):646-648.
[9] 马 波,马江卫,尹战海.微创关节外侧直切口入路手术治疗Sanders Ⅲ型跟骨骨折32例临床研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2018,47(3):314-316,319.
[10] 周国柱,鲍自立,倪建平,等.四黄悬液外敷治疗跟骨骨折早期肿痛临床观察[J].陕西中医,2017,38(6):746-747.
[11] 阚玉华,徐宏威,廖 燚,等.踝关节镜辅助经钢板螺钉固定下胫腓联合治疗Maisonneuve骨折[J].国际外科学杂志,2018,44(7):447-451.
[12] 江 东,胡跃林,焦 晨,等.改良辅助入路全关节镜下修复踝关节外侧副韧带[J].中国微创外科杂志,2019,19(1):11-14.
[13] 刘亮洪,孙 赞,杨小丽.距下关节镜闭合复位经皮螺钉内固定治疗跟骨SandersⅡ型、Ⅲ骨折的临床研究[J].中国实用医药,2020,15(28):82-84.
[14] 陈延武,阴小龙,董 博,等.中药溻渍疗法治疗早期跟骨骨折临床疗效观察[J].陕西中医,2020,41(11):1619-1622.
[15] 白 涛,鲁 良.重组人骨形态发生蛋白骨修复材料联合切开复位内固定治疗跟骨骨折临床研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(7):815-817.
[16] 王小超,王 强,沈影超.跟骨骨折的微创手术治疗进展[J].局解手术学杂志,2019,28(2):86-90.
[17] 马 林,李 焱,陈小强,等.经跗骨窦切口三维次序复位治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的早期临床疗效[J].创伤外科杂志,2020,22(4):245-249.
[18] 沈国栋,邹运璇,张宏宁,等.全关节镜辅助下空心螺钉内固定治疗Sanders Ⅱ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折[J].中国组织工程研究 2020,24(33):5343-5348.
[19] 吴佳俊,沈 超,付备刚,等.关节镜辅助下经跗骨窦入路内固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2019,16(5):31-34.
[20] 余双喜,王 娜,李思云.关节镜辅助下切开复位内固定治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效[J].实用中西医结合临床,2018,18(2):124-127.

相似文献/References:

[1]喻 刚,吴威甫,周 燕.关节镜下自体腘绳肌和同种异体肌腱在重建前交叉韧带中的应用研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(3):309.
 YU Gang,WU Weifu,ZHOU Yan..Efficacy of arthroscopic autologous hamstring and allogeneic tendon in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament[J].,2020,49(10):309.
[2]郭高鹏,王 强,张 晨,等.胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨性关节炎相关研究进展*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(9):1195.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.09.037]
 GUO Gaopeng,WANG Qiang,ZHANG Chen,et al.Research progress of high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].,2020,49(10):1195.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.09.037]
[3]朱 莉,邹文远,敖 锋.三种MRI生理学定量技术对早期膝关节软骨损伤的诊断价值[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(3):293.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.03.009]
 ZHU Li,ZOU Wenyuan,AO Feng.Diagnostic value of three MRI physiological quantitative techniques for early cartilage injury of knee joint[J].,2021,50(10):293.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.03.009]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:陕西省社会发展科技攻关项目(2017SF179)
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-08