[1]李兴杰,桂普国.CT胆道仿真内窥镜在胆总管下段阴性结石诊断中的应用[J].陕西医学杂志,2021,50(5):559-562,567.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.05.011]
 LI Xingjie,GUI Puguo.Application value of CTVC in diagnosis of negative lower common bile duct stones[J].,2021,50(5):559-562,567.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.05.011]
点击复制

CT胆道仿真内窥镜在胆总管下段阴性结石诊断中的应用
分享到:

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
50
期数:
2021年5期
页码:
559-562,567
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2021-05-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application value of CTVC in diagnosis of negative lower common bile duct stones
作者:
李兴杰1桂普国2
(1.安康市人民医院放射科,陕西 安康 725000; 2.杨凌示范区医院肝胆普外科,陕西 杨凌 712100)
Author(s):
LI XingjieGUI Puguo
(Department of Radiology,Ankang People's Hospital,Ankang 725000,China)
关键词:
胆总管下段阴性结石 诊断 CT胆道仿真内窥镜 螺旋CT 内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影 准确率
Keywords:
Negative lower common bile duct stones Diagnosis CTVC Spiral CT Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Accuracy
分类号:
R 657.42
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.05.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨CT胆道仿真内窥镜(CTVC)在胆总管下段阴性结石诊断中的应用价值。方法:选取76例胆总管下段阴性结石患者作为研究对象,所有患者通过手术病理诊断为胆总管下段阴性结石,与术后结果对比观察螺旋CT薄层扫描、CTVC和内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的诊断结果,分析CTVC在胆总管下段阴性结石中的诊断价值。结果:三种检测方法对左右肝管、肝总管、胆总管显示率对比均无统计学差异(均P>0.05),胆囊管和三、四级肝内胆管分支显示率对比均有统计学差异(均P<0.05),ERCP诊断显示率更高(P<0.05),但ERCP与CTVC对比无统计学差异(P>0.05); 76例胆总管下段阴性结石患者,CTVC诊断的结石直径大小与术后手术确诊无明显差别,而且其诊断准确率均高于螺旋CT和ERCP(均P<0.05),三种检测方法对于胆管扩张检出数对比无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在阴性结石检出数上,CTVC的检出率最高(P<0.05),其中ERCP将6例患者误诊为气泡,2例患者诊断为正常,螺旋CT将23例患者诊断为炎性狭窄可能,有8例患者未诊断出确切异常。螺旋CT诊断不良反应发生率为1.32%,ERCP诊断不良反应发生率为15.18%,CTVC诊断不良反应发生率为3.95%,ERCP的诊断不良反应发生率明显高于其他两组(P<0.05); 三种诊断方法的特异度、阴性预测值对比均无统计学差异(均P>0.05),CTVC检查的准确度、敏感度和阳性预测值明显高于ERCP和螺旋CT(均P<0.05)。结论:CTVC虽然诊断耗时多,需要静脉滴注胆影葡胺后再进行CT扫描,但是诊断无创伤,没有严重不良反应,对于胆总管下段阴性结石中的诊断与手术诊断病理结果相符,可以为患者提供更可靠的临床诊断依据。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the application of surgical pathological diagnosis and CT virtual endoscopy in the diagnosis of lower common bile duct stones.Methods:76 patients with negative lower common bile duct stones were selected as the research objects.All patients were diagnosed with negative lower common bile duct stones by surgical and pathological diagnosis.The diagnostic results of spiral CT thin-slice scan,CTVC and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)were compared with the postoperative results,and the diagnostic value of CTVC in negative lower common bile duct stones was analyzed.Results:The three detection methods showed no statistical difference in the display rate of left and right hepatic duct,common hepatic duct,and common bile duct(all P>0.05); there were statistical differences in the display rates of the cystic duct and the third and fourth grade intrahepatic bile duct branches(all P<0.05); the diagnosis rate of ERCP was higher(P<0.05),but there was no statistical difference between ERCP and CTVC(P>0.05).In 76 patients with negative lower common bile duct stones,the diameter of the stones diagnosed by CTVC was different from that of the postoperative diagnosis,and the diagnostic accuracy was higher than that of spiral CT and ERCP(all P<0.05).The three detection methods had no statistical difference in the number of bile duct dilatation detected(P>0.05).In terms of the number of negative stones detected,CTVC had the highest detection rate(P<0.05); ERCP misdiagnosed 6 patients as air bubbles,2 patients were diagnosed as normal,and spiral CT diagnosed 23 patients as possible inflammatory stenosis,and 8 patients were not diagnosed as abnormal.The incidence of adverse reactions in spiral CT,ERCP and CTVC was 1.32%,15.18% and 3.95%,respectively,and the incidence of adverse reactions in ERCP was significantly higher than that in other two groups(all P<0.05).The specificity and negative predictive value of the three diagnostic methods were not statistically different(all P>0.05),and the accuracy,sensitivity and positive predictive value of CTVC were significantly higher than those of ERCP and spiral CT(all P<0.05).Conclusion:Although CTVC is time-consuming and requires intravenous infusion of cholangioglucamine,it is non-invasive and there are no serious adverse reactions.The diagnosis results of negative lower common bile duct stones is consistent with the pathological results,which can provide patients with more reliable clinical diagnosis basis..

参考文献/References:

[1] 张 毅,闫国诚,王双全.改良五孔法腹腔镜手术路径在胆囊并胆总管结石治疗中的应用研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,48(3):311-313,321.
[2] 汪力新.柴胡郁金排石汤结合硬膜外腔阻滞麻醉治疗胆总管结石疗效研究[J].陕西中医,2018,39(9):1241-1243.
[3] 袁 赛,肖 萤.不同影像学方法在胆总管下段结石中的诊断价值[J].医学临床研究,2016,33(4):769-771.
[4] Yan T,Zhang L,Shao F,et al.The effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography on patients with common bile duct stones[J].Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics,2020,10(9):2186-2191.
[5] 张 琦,王之璐,王 巍,等.腹腔镜联合经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术治疗胆总管结石的疗效观察[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(4):190-193.
[6] 王 喆,张 强,陈垚宇.腹腔镜胆总管探查+胆囊切除术与内镜逆行性胰胆管造影+胆囊切除术的预后效果比较[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2020,25(12):70-73,80.
[7] 赵登秋,孔德林,汪运节,等.胰管结石的临床诊断与治疗[J].中华内分泌外科杂志,2020,14(3):195-198.
[8] 闫 伟,郑丽玲.《2017年英国胃肠病学会胆总管结石的管理指南》摘译[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017,33(8):1440-1447.
[9] 袁宁璐,樊一萌.CT仿真内窥镜与钡餐检查在早期胃癌鉴别中的应用比较[J].现代肿瘤医学,2018,248(14):125-128.
[10] 史江海,刘东斌,仝小刚,等.内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影术后肝被膜下血肿破裂出血一例[J].临床外科杂志,2020,28(4):104-105.
[11] 阳 桃.腹部彩超联合磁共振胰胆管造影对胆总管结石诊断的价值探讨[J].影像研究与医学应用,2020,4(14):116-118.
[12] 王 超,徐锋,戴朝六.超声内镜联合磁共振胰胆管造影对可疑胆总管结石的诊断价值[J].现代生物医学进展,2019,35(1):127-130.
[13] Kallies KJ,Borgert AJ,Kothari SN,et al.Utility of ERCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis:An institutional analysis and literature review[J].The American Journal of Surgery,2017,214(2):1877-1892.
[14] 吴炎炎,燕善军,李大鹏,等.回顾性研究ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆管结石临床特点及结石复发情况[J].中华全科医学,2020,18(2):188-190,207.
[15] 崔喻芳,鲍峻峻,宋育林,等.超声内镜对胆总管结石的诊断价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2019,35(12):2741-2743.
[16] 邢丽丽,赵白信,焦方杰,等.超声联合磁共振胰胆管成像在诊断胆总管结石中的应用价值[J].现代医药卫生,2020,36(2):233-235.
[17] 李 伟,谢佳明,叶振宇,等.胆道镜在胆道系统结石相关疾病诊断中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志,2020,11(8):876-881.
[18] 戴 结,梁丁保,胡炳德,等.EUS和MRCP对胆总管结石诊断准确性试验的Meta分析[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2020,29(2):195-202.
[19] 秦 明,黄 涛,王献魁.ERCP联合LC对胆囊结石并胆总管结石的疗效及对炎症因子水平的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2018,21(2):136-137,140.
[20] 熊 亮,刘源源,李 胜,等.CT仿真内窥镜成像联合肿瘤标志物检测对胃癌的诊断价值[J].癌症进展,2020,21(17):1771-1773,1793.

相似文献/References:

[1]王双龙,于 美,吕 镔,等.声脉冲辐射力成像定量评估兔肝缺血再灌注损伤实验研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(2):140.
 WANG Shuanglong,YU Mei,LV Bin,et al.Quantitative assessment of hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury with acoustic radiation force impulse in rabbit[J].,2020,49(5):140.
[2]陈 爽.不同彩色多普勒超声检查方式在异位妊娠早期诊断中的应用研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(2):154.
 CHEN Shuang..Application of different color Doppler ultrasonography in early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy[J].,2020,49(5):154.
[3]刘永收,张 媛,秦 梅,等.手环血氧仪在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征诊断中的应用[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(2):176.
 LIU Yongshou,ZHANG Yuan,QIN Mei,et al.Application of wearable reflex oximeter in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome[J].,2020,49(5):176.
[4]宋亚邛,胡海燕△.VEGF、TGF-β1、CA19-9、CA242和DKK1联合检测对早期胰腺癌临床诊断价值研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(2):237.
 SONG Yaqiong,HU Haiyan..Clinical value analysis of combined examination of VEGF,TGF-β1,CA19-9,CA242 and DKK1 in patients with early pancreatic cancer[J].,2020,49(5):237.
[5]郭晓波,蔺 京,来春艳,等.新型冠状病毒与实时荧光RT-PCR核酸检测*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(3):264.
[6]王 琪,卢朝祥△,陈晓峰,等.预测6月龄以下骶尾部畸胎瘤良恶性的列线图建立研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(3):313.
 WANG Qi,LU Chaoxiang,CHEN Xiaofeng,et al.Establishment of anomogram for predicting benign and malignant sacrococcygeal teratomas below 6 months[J].,2020,49(5):313.
[7]王迎春,孔延亮,蔚文祥,等.家庭聚集性新型冠状病毒肺炎患者初次就诊临床检验与CT特征分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(4):392.
 WANG Yingchun,KONG Yanliang,WEI Wenxiang,et al.Laboratory examination and CT features of family aggregative corona virus disease 2019 patients at first visit[J].,2020,49(5):392.
[8]杨自华,郭平学,王西辉,等.miRNA-244与miRNA-328在胆管癌患者血清中的表达及意义*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(5):549.
 YANG Zihua,GUO Pingxue,WANG Xihui,et al.Expression and significance of miRNA-244 and miRNA-328 in serum of patients with cholangiocarcinoma[J].,2020,49(5):549.
[9]王双龙,吕 镔△,李 龙,等.超声造影参数成像在甲状腺微小乳头状癌鉴别诊断中的应用价值*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(5):599.
 WANG Shuanglong,LV Bin,LI Long,et al.The value of parametric imaging of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of papillary thyroidmicrocarcinoma[J].,2020,49(5):599.
[10]权浩浩,于小勇,程小红,等.血清抗M型磷脂酶A2受体抗体检测在膜性肾病诊断中的价值研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(6):755.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2020.06.029]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2020JM-703)
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-06