[1]史纪元,武世勋,刘时璋,等.瓦格纳型假体置换术治疗股骨转子间骨折(Evans Ⅳ型)近期临床疗效观察*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(12):1580-1583.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.12.011]
 SHI Jiyuan,WU Shixun,LIU Shizhang,et al.Short term effect of Wagner-type prosthesis replacement in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture(Evans type Ⅳ)[J].,2020,49(12):1580-1583.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.12.011]
点击复制

瓦格纳型假体置换术治疗股骨转子间骨折(Evans Ⅳ型)近期临床疗效观察*
分享到:

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
49
期数:
2020年12期
页码:
1580-1583
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Short term effect of Wagner-type prosthesis replacement in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture(Evans type Ⅳ)
作者:
史纪元1武世勋1刘时璋1易 智1傅 蔷2△
1.陕西省人民医院骨科(西安 710068); 2.西安市儿童医院血液肿瘤科(西安 710003)
Author(s):
SHI JiyuanWU ShixunLIU Shizhanget al.
Department of Orthopedics,Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital(Xi'an 710068)
关键词:
生物型假体 股骨转子间骨折 关节功能 并发症
Keywords:
Biotype prosthesis Femoral intertrochanteric fracture Joint function Complication
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.12.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:对比瓦格纳型(生物型)假体置换术与内固定术治疗股骨转子间骨折(Evans Ⅳ型)的近期疗效。方法:选择74股骨转子间骨折(Evans Ⅳ型)患者为研究对象,按照简单随机分组法分为观察组和对照组,每组37例。观察组采用瓦格纳型(生物型)假体置换术治疗,对照组采用内固定术治疗。比较两组手术疗效、关节功能恢复情况及并发症发生情况。结果:观察组手术时长、术后下地时间均显著低于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后引流量和术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前两组髋关节Harris评分及Singh指数比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。术后3、6个月两组髋关节Harris评分及Singh指数均较术前显著升高(P<0.05),且观察组髋关节Harris评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05),但两组Singh指数比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。观察组并发症发生率与对照组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:与内固定术相比,瓦格纳型(生物型)假体置换术治疗不稳定型Evans Ⅳ型股骨转子间骨折近期疗效较好。
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the efficacy of Wagner-type(biotype)prosthesis replacement and internal fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture(Evans type Ⅳ).Methods:74 patients with intertrochanteric fracture(Evans type Ⅳ)were randomly divided into observation group and control group,37 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with Wagner-type prosthesis replacement,while the control group was treated with internal fixation.The curative effect,joint function recovery and complications of the two groups were compared.Results:The operation time and postoperative ambulation time of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative drainage volume and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in Harris score and Singh index before operation between the two groups(P>0.05).At 3 months and 6 months after surgery,the Harris score and Singh index of the two groups were significantly higher than those before operation(P<0.05),and the Harris score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in Singh index between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the observation group and the control group(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared with internal fixation,Wagner-type(biotype)prosthesis replacement has better short-term effect in the treatment of unstable Evans type Ⅳ intertrochanteric fracture.

参考文献/References:

[1] 高 健,沈志敏,王国胜,等.不同材料髋关节假体置换在老年股骨转子间骨折中的应用研究[J].中国现代医生,2018,56(17):17-20.
[2] 张希柱,苗海坤,解成余,等.股骨转子间骨折急诊与择期手术治疗疗效对比分析[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2017,12(10):965-967.
[3] 王跃辉,邹士平,陈 宾,等.生物型加长柄半髋关节置换治疗高龄粉碎性股骨转子间骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(3):267-270.
[4] 李 真,饶仁林,骆 浩.半髋关节置换术治疗高龄不稳定股骨转子间骨折中的假体选择[J].创伤外科杂志,2019,21(6):475-476.
[5] 郑汉龙,黄 勇,邵宏翊,等.生物型组配式股骨柄在Vancouver B2、B3型股骨假体周围骨折关节翻修术中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2017,37(15):914-920.
[6] 汪志红.生物型和骨水泥型股骨假体全髋关节置换术治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折的临床效果[J].世界临床医学,2016,10(22):83-85.
[7] 左德灵,尹 东.老年股骨转子间骨折髋关节置换术中假体选择的研究概述[J].中国临床新医学,2017,10(12):1222-1225.
[8] 甄 平,周胜虎,李旭升,等.股骨距重建全髋关节置换术治疗合并晚期股骨头坏死的不稳定型股骨转子间骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2017,19(11):960-965.
[9] 韩以杰,魏招阳,李智波,等.半髋关节置换和锁定钢板内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效[J].实用骨科杂志,2016,22(6):544-547.
[10] 游文富.高龄股骨转子间骨折人工关节置换的特点及假体选择[J].数理医药学杂志,2016,29(11):1713-1714.
[11] 何 苗,邓志龙,曹志东,等.防旋型股骨近端髓内钉内固定术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折患者的生物力学性能[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2019,36(8):989-994.
[12] 卢 玮,曾 敏,雷鹏飞,等.Wagner Cone生物型股骨假体置换联合转子下短缩截骨术治疗成人Crowe Ⅳ型髋关节发育不良[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2019,33(8):929-934.
[13] 薛开禄,洪盈盈,王玉龙,等.体外冲击波治疗对肩手综合征患者肩关节功能的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(6):720-723.
[14] 谭泽恩,张 亮,黄德勇,等.生物型假体全髋关节置换术治疗Perthes病后遗骨关节炎的中期随访研究[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2019,12(8):594-598.
[15] 刘 刚,蒋协远.股骨转子间不稳定型骨折内固定物的选择[J].中华骨科杂志,2018,38(22):1403-1412.
[16] 邱文奎,徐 伟,栗 磊,等.云南白药对老年股骨转子间骨折股骨近端防旋髓内针内固定术围手术期隐性失血、术后髋关节活动的影响[J].陕西中医,2019,40(6):773-776.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*陕西省重点研发计划项目(2017SF-259)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-11