[1]宋国瑞,刘子歌,张 晨,等.微创通道辅助缝合系统结合改良Bunnel缝合法治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂临床疗效研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(9):1078-1081.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.09.006]
　SONG Guorui,LIU Zige,ZHANG Chen,et al.Efficacy of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair combined with modified Bunnel suture in treatment of acute closed Achilles tendon rupture[J].,2020,49(9):1078-1081.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.09.006]
点击复制

微创通道辅助缝合系统结合改良Bunnel缝合法治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂临床疗效研究*

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
49
期数:
2020年9期
页码:
1078-1081
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair combined with modified Bunnel suture in treatment of acute closed Achilles tendon rupture
作者:
宋国瑞1; 刘子歌1; 张 晨1; 杨 超1; 王 硕1; 席向东1; Munna(孟加拉)2; 陈德胜3△
1.宁夏医科大学临床医学院(银川 750004); 2.宁夏医科大学留学生学院(银川 750004); 3.宁夏医科大学总医院骨科(银川 750004)
Author(s):
SONG Guorui; LIU Zige; ZHANG Chen; et al.
School of Clinical Medicine,Ningxia Medical University(Yinchuan 750004)
关键词:
跟腱;  跟腱断裂;  通道辅助;  缝合系统;  微创修复;  改良Bunnel缝合
Keywords:
Achilles tendon;  Achilles tendon rupture;  Channel-assisted;  Suture system;  Minimally invasive repair;  Modified Bunnel suture
分类号:
R686.1
DOI:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2020.09.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨通道辅助缝合系统(CAMIR)微创修复术结合改良Bunnel缝合法治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂的临床疗效。方法:选取因运动损伤导致急性闭合性跟腱断裂的21例患者为研究对象,采用CAMIR结合改良Bunnel缝合法进行治疗。记录手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、住院时间、切口愈合情况、术后并发症、术后末次随访Arner-Lindholm疗效评分,比较术前与术后末次随访的美国矫形外科足踝协会(AOFAS)评分。结果:所有患者均获完整随访,随访12～24个月,平均(15.0±3.47)个月; 手术时间30～45 min,平均(35.17±4.84)min; 术中出血量20～55 ml,平均(47.78±8.08)ml; 切口长度2～3 cm,平均(2.50±0.80)cm; 住院时间4～7 d,平均(5.22±1.00)d; 所有患者手术切口愈合良好,无切口感染、下肢静脉血栓形成、跟腱再断裂以及腓肠神经损伤等并发症; 术后末次随访时,所有患者步态、跖屈及提踵力量均恢复至断裂前水平,依Arner-Lindholm疗效评分标准获得优18例,良3例,优良率100%; 术前及术后末次随访AOFAS评分分别为(45.00±10.04)分和(96.48±4.30)分,两者比较存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:CAMIR结合改良Bunnel缝合法治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂与其他手术方式相比,在缩短手术及住院时间、减少创伤、降低切口感染率的基础上能够避免腓肠神经损伤,近期临床效果明显。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical effect of channel-assisted minimal invasive repair(CAMRI)combined with modified Bunnel suture in the treatment of acute closed Achilles tendon rupture.Methods:21 patients with acute closed Achilles tendon rupture caused by sports injury were selected as the study object,and treated with CAMIR and modified Bunnel suture.The operation time,intraoperative hemorrhage volume,incision length,hospitalization time,incision healing,postoperative complications,Arner-Lindholm score at the last follow-up after operation were recorded,and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS)scores before operation and at the last follow-up after operation were compared.Results:All patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months,with an average of(15.0±3.47)months.The operation time was 30 to 45 minutes,with an average of(35.17±4.84)minutes; intraoperative hemorrhage volume was 20 to 55 ml,with an average of(47.78±8.08)ml; incision length was 2 to 3 cm,with an average of(2.50±0.80)cm; hospitalization time was 4 to 7 days,with an average of(5.22±1.00)days.There were no complications such as infection of incision,rupture of Achilles tendon,thrombosis of lower extremity vein and injury of sural nerve.At the last follow-up,the gait,plantar flexion and heel lifting strength of all patients recovered to the level before fracture.According to the Arner-Lindholm efficacy score,18 cases were excellent,3 cases were good,and the excellent and good rate was 100%.The AOFAS scores before operation and at the last follow-up after operation were 41.89±4.61 and 95.06±2.44 respectively,with statistical difference(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with other surgical methods,CAMIR combined with modified Bunnel suture can avoid the injury of sural nerve on the basis of shortening the time of operation and hospitalization,reducing the trauma and reducing the infection rate of incision,and has obvious clinical effect in the near future.

参考文献/References:

[1] Ganestam A,Kallemose T,Troelsen A,et al.Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013.A nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2016,24(12):3730-3737.
[2] Robertson A,Godavitarne C,Bellringer S,et al.Standardised virtual fracture clinic management of Achilles tendon ruptures is safe and reproducible[J].Foot and Ankle Surgery,2019,25(6):255-266.
[3] 方家刘,詹俊锋,李 军,等.急性闭合性跟腱断裂的治疗进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2018,38(1):53-59.
[4] 徐海林.急性跟腱断裂治疗的相关热点问题[J].中国骨伤,2019,32(8):683-685.
[5] Patel MS,Kadakia AR.Minimally invasive treatments of acute Achilles tendon ruptures[J].Foot and Ankle Clinics of North America,2019,24(3):399-424.
[6] Joannas G,Arrondo G,Eslava S,et al.Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with the Dresden instrument.Clinical and MRI evaluation of 90 patients[J].Foot and Ankle Surgery:Official Journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons,2019,2(25):255-263.
[7] 张树峰,高长城,叶武智,等.双枚带线锚钉治疗跟腱断裂33例[J].陕西医学杂志,2014,43(10):1321-1323.
[8] Qi HZ,Chen H,Tang PF,et al.Comparison of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair and 3 common Achilles tendon restoration techniques [J].Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine,2019,17(2):1426-1434.
[9] 张志强,夏贤生.开放微创手术与经皮Yuet-bone缝合治疗急性跟腱断裂的临床对比研究[J].中国医学创新,2019,16(19):18-21.
[10] Zhang H,Liu PZ,Zhang X,et al.A new less invasive surgical technique in the management of acute Achilles tendon rupture through limited-open procedure combined with a single-anchor and “circuit” suture technique[J].Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research,2018,13(1):198-205.
[11] Chen H,Ji XR,Tang PF,et al.Channel-assisted minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture[J].Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research,2015,10(1):167-173.
[12] 陈庆华.微创手术与传统修复手术治疗急性跟腱断裂的疗效对比[J].临床医学工程,2019,26(8):1079-1080.
[13] Wu YH,Lin LH,Li H,et al.Is surgical intervention more effective than non-surgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses[J].International Journal of Surgery,2016,36(12):305-311.
[14] 余炯杰,颜 丹,李 甲,等.急性闭合性跟腱断裂手术治疗进展[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,23(9):820-823.
[15] Manegold S,Tsitsilonis S,Gehlen T,et al.Alterations in structure of the muscle-tendon unit and gait pattern after percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon rupture with the Dresden instrument[J].Foot and Ankle Surgery:Official Journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons,2019,25(4):247-255.
[16] Cretnik A,Kosanovic M,Smrkolj V.Percutaneous versus open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon:a comparative study[J].Am J Sports Med,2005,33(9):1369-1379.
[17] Hsu AR,Jones CP,Cohen BE,et al.Clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous Achilles repair system versus open techniques for acute Achilles tendon ruptures[J].Foot & Ankle International,2015,36(11):1279-1286.
[18] Yang B,Liu Y,Kan S,et al.Outcomes and complications of percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture:a meta-analysis[J].Int J Surg,2017,40:178-186.
[19] 陈 华,郝 明,唐佩福,等.经通道辅助缝合系统微创修复急性闭合跟腱断裂的疗效观察[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2015,29(1):35-38.
[20] 齐红哲,朱正国,常祖豪,等.通道辅助微创缝合与两种常用跟腱缝合方式的生物力学研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2017,17(18):3477-3480.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*国家自然科学基金资助项目(81760405,81760395,81560364);宁夏回族自治区自然科学基金资助重点项目(2018AAC02013);宁夏医科大学校级科研重点项目(XZ2018014)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-02