[1]李鹏善,张录强△,肖 华,等.不同入路髋关节置换术对老年患者其关节功能恢复及生活质量的影响临床研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2020,49(4):435-438.
 LI Pengshan,ZHANG Luqiang,XIAO Hua,et al.Effect of different approaches of hip replacement on joint function recovery and quality of life in elderly patients[J].,2020,49(4):435-438.
点击复制

不同入路髋关节置换术对老年患者其关节功能恢复及生活质量的影响临床研究*
分享到:

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
49
期数:
2020年4期
页码:
435-438
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-04-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of different approaches of hip replacement on joint function recovery and quality of life in elderly patients
文章编号:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2020.04.012
作者:
李鹏善张录强肖 华张 静
陕西省宝鸡高新人民医院(宝鸡 721006)
Author(s):
LI PengshanZHANG LuqiangXIAO Huaet al.
Baoji High-tech People's Hospital,Shaanxi Province(Baoji 721006)
关键词:
髋关节置换术 前外侧入路 后外侧入路 关节功能 生活质量 老年人
Keywords:
Hip replacement Anterolateral approach Posterolateral approach Joint function Quality of life Seniors
分类号:
R658.3
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探究不同入路髋关节置换术老年患者其关节功能恢复及生活质量的影响。方法:选择行髋关节置换术的86例老年患者为研究对象,根据其选择的手术入路将其分为前外侧入路组(47例)与后外侧入路组(39例),对比两组患者手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量,对比两组患者术后6周、3个月及6个月髋关节Harris评分,最后对两组患者术前及术后髋关节主动活动范围及生活质量评分(SF-36)进行对比。结果:①前外侧入路组患者手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量均低于后外侧入路组(P<0.05); ②前外侧入路组患者术后6周、3个月及6个月髋关节Harris评分明显高于后外侧入路组(P<0.05); ③术前两组患者髋关节主动活动范围对比差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),术后前外侧入路组患者髋关节伸展、外展、内外旋角度均大于后外侧入路组(P<0.05); ④术前两组患者SF-36各维度得分对比差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05),术后前外侧入路组患者得分明显高于后外侧入路组(P<0.05)。结论:前外侧入路组能够显著减小老年髋关节置换术患者创伤、术中出血量,同时能够加快患者术后髋关节功能恢复,改善其关节功能,同时提高其生活质量。
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect of different approaches of hip replacement on joint function recovery and quality of life in elderly patients. Methods:86 elderly patients underwent hip replacement were selected as the study subjects. According to the surgical approachs,they were divided into anterolateral approach group(47 cases)and posterolateral approach group(39 cases). The incision length,operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume and postoperative drainage volume were compared between the two groups. The Harris hip score was compared between the two groups 6 weeks,3 months and 6 months after operation. Finally,the active range of motion of hip joint and the quality of life score(SF-36)were compared between the two groups before and after operation. Results:The incision length,operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume and postoperative drainage volume of the anterolateral approach group were lower than those of the posterolateral approach group(P<0.05). The Harris hip score of the anterolateral approach group was significantly higher than that of the posterolateral approach group 6 weeks,3 months and 6 months after operation(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in active range of motion of hip joint between the two groups before opration(P>0.05),but the extension,abduction and rotation angle of hip joint in the anterolateral approach group were greater than those in the posterolateral approach group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in SF-36 scores between the two groups before operation(P>0.05),but the scores of the anterolateral approach group were significantly higher than those of the posterolateral approach group(P<0.05). Conclusion:The anterolateral approach can significantly reduce the trauma and intraoperative bleeding volume in elderly patients,accelerate the recovery of hip function,improve the joint function and the quality of life.

参考文献/References:

[1] Lim J W,Ng G S,Jenkins R C,et al.Total hip replacement for neck of femur fracture:Comparing outcomes with matched elective cohort[J].Injury-international Journal of the Care of the Injured,2016,47(10):2144-2148.
[2] Chesser T.J.S,Fox R,Harding K,et al.The administration of intermittent parathyroid hormone affects functional recovery from trochanteric fractured neck of femur:a randomised prospective mixed method pilot study[J].The Bone & Joint Journal,2016,98-B(6):840-845.
[3] 李 宁,刘昊楠,龚晓峰,等.北京某三甲医院股骨颈骨折住院患者现状的流行病学分析[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2016,48(2):292-296.
[4] 詹世安,丁 晟,宋国全,等.全髋与半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(5):475-477.
[5] 杨登峰,阮文辉,谢 鹏,等.重组人骨保护素对激素性股骨头坏死患者骨密度及髋关节Harris评分的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(16):3108-3111.
[6] 张俊霞. 早期抗阻训练联合心身干预对髋关节置换术后患者功能恢复和不良情绪的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2018,24(21):2521-2524.
[7] 王 山,樊文洁,俞婉琦,等.SF-36量表应用于城市化居民生命质量评价的信度和效度分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2016,37(3):344-347.
[8] 沈正东,于慧敏,王俊婷,等. 改良版西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数量表在膝骨关节炎中的应用[J]. 中华医学杂志,2019,99(7):537-541.
[9] 中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组,中国医师协会骨科医师分会创伤专家工作委员会. 成人股骨颈骨折诊治指南[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(11):921.
[10] 胡家朗,李绍刚,陈 明,等. 动力加压锁定钉板系统与空心拉力螺钉固定PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折的生物力学比较[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2018,38(21):1322-1329.
[11] Varnum C,Pedersen AB,Kjaersgaard-Andersen P,et al.Do different types of bearings and noise from total hip arthroplasty influence hip-related pain,function,and quality of life postoperatively[J]?Acta Orthopaedica,2016,87(6):567-574.
[12] 郄晓娟,郑文婧,董江龙,等.老年患者髋关节置换术后认知功能障碍的危险因素分析[J].广东医学,2016,37(10):1488-1491.
[13] 杨 林,汪晓平,李红艳,等. 瘦素人类含Ⅰ型血小板结合蛋白基序的解聚蛋白样金属蛋白酶4与类风湿关节炎骨破坏相关性研究[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志,2018,22(6):401-404.
[14] 王 瑞,李圣节,李 飞,等.探讨应用下肢推蹬运动控制与训练系统对膝关节创伤性关节炎患者功能恢复的影响[J].解放军医学院学报,2018,39(7):614-617.
[15] 高 峰.不同手术入路行髋关节置换术对患者髋关节功能恢复的影响[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2017,32(1):72-73.
[16] 何 斌,成伟男,王云华,等.前、后外侧入路对髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓及脱位的影响[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2013,10(2):54-56.

相似文献/References:

[1]饶新仪.腰硬联合麻醉髋关节置换术后患者疼痛及炎症细胞因子的影响研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(7):876.
 Rao Xinyi..The effect of combined lumbar and anesthesia on pain and inflammatory cytokines after hip arthroplasty[J].,2019,(4):876.
[2]许 彬,宋 珍,盛新安,等.老年髋关节置换术患者全麻术后认知功能障碍与脑动-静脉氧含量差值相关性分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2023,52(1):71.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.01.016]
 XU Bin,SONG Zhen,SHENG Xin'an,et al.Correlation between postoperative cognitive dysfunction and brain arteriovenous oxygen content difference after general anesthesia in elderly patients with hip replacement[J].,2023,52(4):71.[doi:DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.01.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*陕西省自然科学基金资助项目(2016JQ8040)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-13