[1]李雪薇,田 晔,马玉翠△.不同浓度A型肉毒素治疗偏侧面肌痉挛疗效及安全性探讨*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(11):1545-1547,1573.
 LI Xuewei,TIAN Ye,MA Yucui.Clinical efficacy and safty of botulinum toxin A in patients with hemifacial spasm[J].,2019,(11):1545-1547,1573.
点击复制

不同浓度A型肉毒素治疗偏侧面肌痉挛疗效及安全性探讨*
分享到:

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年11期
页码:
1545-1547,1573
栏目:
药物与临床
出版日期:
2019-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical efficacy and safty of botulinum toxin A in patients with hemifacial spasm
文章编号:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2019.11.038
作者:
李雪薇田 晔马玉翠△
西安市第三医院(西安 710018)
Author(s):
LI XueweiTIAN YeMA Yucui
Xi’an No 3 Hospital(Xi’an 710018)
关键词:
偏侧面肌痉挛治疗A型肉毒素剂量疗效安全性
Keywords:
Key words Hemifacial spasmTherapyBotulinum toxin type ADoseTherapeutic effectSecurity
分类号:
R74544
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的:比较高浓度A型肉毒素和低浓度A型肉毒素对长期重复肉毒素注射治疗的偏侧面肌痉挛(HFS)患者的远期疗效。方法:对100例HFS患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,其中实验组采用局部注射高浓度A型肉毒素治疗,对照组采用局部注低浓度A型肉毒素治疗。记录患者痉挛缓解起效时间和痉挛缓解时间,并记录治疗前、治疗后3个月、6个月临床疗效。结果:实验组和对照组痉挛起效时间和痉挛缓解时间比较,实验组痉挛起效时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<005);实验组缓解痉挛时间明显长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<005)。实验组3个月、6个月时全显率为84%和40%,实验组3个月、6个月时总有效率为44%和58%,实验组效果优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<005)。与治疗前比较,两组治疗后3及6个月SAS评分显著降低;与对照组比较,实验组治疗后3及6个月SAS评分显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<005)。结论:高浓度肉毒素治疗HFS安全、更有效,起效时间短,缓解痉挛时间长,还能缓解患者焦虑情绪。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective:To compare the longterm clinical efficacy of highconcentration and lowconcentration botulinum toxin A in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) ,who were treated with longterm repeated botulinum toxin injection Methods:100 patients with HFS were randomly divided into experimental group and control group The experimental group was treated with local injection of highconcentration botulinum toxin A,and the control group with low concentration The onset time of spasticity relief and the time of spasticity relief were recorded,and the clinical efficacy before treatment,3 and 6 months after treatment was recorded Results:The onset time of spasticity relief in the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P<005),and the time of spasticity relief in the experimental group was significantly longer than that in the control group (P<005) In the experimental group,the total marked rate were 84% and 40%,the total effective rate were 94% and 58% at 3 months and 6 months The effect of the experimental group was better than that of the control group(P<005) Compared with pretreatment,SAS scores of two groups decreased significantly 3 and 6 months after treatment Compared with the control group,SAS scores of the experimental group decreased significantly 3 and 6 months after treatment (P<005)Conclusion:Highconcentration botulinum toxin A is safe and effective,can shorten onset time,relieve spasticity for longer time,and can also relieve anxiety of patients

参考文献/References:

[1] 雷凯悦,杨东红针灸治疗面肌痉挛研究进展[J].长春中医药大学学报,2018,34(6):12151218.
[2] 眭 兰,岳宝安,屈箫箫针刺疏肝安神穴位治疗面肌痉挛30例[J].陕西中医,2011,32(11):1539.
[3] 高 静穴位注射、针刺配合艾灸治疗面肌痉挛50例[J].陕西中医,2013,34(1):7071.
[4] 窦祖林,欧海宁痉挛肉毒素注射技术[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:2829
[5] 纪 红,李天一,宫为大A型肉毒毒素治疗特发性面肌痉挛的临床观察[J].中国康复,2017,32(6):495
[6] 孙振晓,刘化学,焦林瑛,等医院焦虑抑郁量表的信度及效度研究[J].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2017,11(2):199.
[7] 杜晶晶,田 晔,张巧俊A型肉毒毒素治疗面肌痉挛112例疗效观察[J].陕西医学杂志,2012,41(12):16561658.
[8] 李又佳,付耀高,钟志耕,等不同浓度A型肉毒毒素治疗偏侧面肌痉挛疗效观察:一项多中心随机双盲交叉设计临床试验[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志,2013,13(6):506511.
[9] 焦 岩,江 恒,周振华,等A型肉毒毒素治疗面肌痉挛的临床疗效分析[J].重庆医学,2010,39(6):653655.
[10] 陈成芳,施俊峰,宋惠花A型肉毒毒素局部注射治疗单纯性面肌痉挛的疗效分析[J].中外医疗,2018,37(8):4244
[11] 邢九冬,韩利军,魏礼梅.A型肉毒毒素局部注射治疗面肌痉挛的临床疗效[J].临床神经病学杂志,2014,27(3):228229.
[12] 叶小斌,阎阳天,张倩倩,等.黛力新联合A型肉毒素治疗面肌痉挛临床观察[J].中国社区医师,2017,33(20):3134.
[13] 向 云,尉洋.不同浓度肉毒素注射治疗偏侧面肌痉挛的临床疗效及不良反应观察[J].中国临床医生杂志,2018,46(5):543546
[14] 邓桂辉.不同浓度A型肉毒毒素治疗偏侧面肌痉挛的临床疗效[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(20):34443445.
[15] 柏 雪,胡凤云.A型肉毒毒素治疗特发性面肌痉挛56例临床观察[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(7):11561157
[16] 薛建中.A型肉毒毒素治疗特发性面肌痉挛的临床应用价值[J].中国临床医学,2011,18(5):718720.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐 博,苏军涛,钟 烨,等.外源性Apelin13对重症急性胰腺炎大鼠治疗作用及其机制研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):148.
 XU Bo,SU Juntao,ZHONG Ye,et al.Effect and mechanism of exogenous apelin13 on severe acute pancreatitis in rats[J].,2019,(11):148.
[2]陈保春,刘利峰.铥激光与等离子电切术治疗膀胱癌疗效对比研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):159.
 CHEN Baochun,LIU Lifeng..Comparative study of thulium laser and plasma electroresection in resection of bladder tumor[J].,2019,(11):159.
[3]张玉亮,朱 宏,戴洪山△.B超引导经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术在胆源性胰腺炎治疗中的临床意义[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):166.
 ZHANG Yuliang,ZHU Hong,DAI Hongshan..Clinical significance of Bmode ultrasound guided percutaneous transhepatic  gallbladder puncture and drainage in the treatment of biliary pancreatitis[J].,2019,(11):166.
[4]徐建庆,买赛虎△,杨喜佳,等.腹腔镜手术治疗复杂性胆囊炎临床疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):176.
 XU Jianqing,MAI Saihu,YANG Xijia,et al.Analysis of curative effect in laparoscopic surgery for complicated cholecystitis[J].,2019,(11):176.
[5]刘 侃,杨栓元,刘旭晨,等.PPH术治疗III、IV度痔中长期疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):183.
 LIU Kan,YANG Shuanyuan,LIU Xucheng,et al.Curative effect of PPH for III and IV hemorrhoids[J].,2019,(11):183.
[6]石 丹,张会久,周达岸.闭合复位经皮空心螺钉内固定与切开复位内固定治疗踝关节骨折疗效对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):186.
 SHI Dan,ZHANG Huijiu,ZHOU Daan..Comparison of closed reduction, percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and open reduction  and internal fixation for ankle fractures[J].,2019,(11):186.
[7]肖东波.不保留小关节植骨床PLIF术治疗老年脊柱退行性疾病价值研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):189.
 XIAO Dongbo..The value of nonreserving small arthroplasty bone PLIF for senile spinal degenerative diseases[J].,2019,(11):189.
[8]高清滢,侯洁心△.高频电波刀宫颈电环切除术治疗中重度宫颈柱状上皮异位临床疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):223.
 GAO Qingying,HOU Jiexin..Observation on the clinical effect of high frequency electric wave knife cervix electroloop resection in the〖JP〗 〖JP4〗treatment of moderate and severe Cervical columnar epithelium ectopicdiagnosed by pathological examination[J].,2019,(11):223.
[9]宋 婷,罗 莉,贾 菲,等.1540 nm非剥脱性点阵激光联合水凝胶医用冷敷贴治疗 凹陷性痤疮瘢痕疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):241.
 SONG Ting,LUO Li,JIA Fei,et al.Effiicacy of nonablative 1540nm fractional laser with medical cool patch in the treatment of acne sca[J].,2019,(11):241.
[10]张 彦,陈 龙.胃镜下肾上腺素与凝血酶联合治疗消化性溃疡合并出血疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):259.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*西安市卫生科研人才项目(J201903070)
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-15