[1]余 伟,高怀军△.腹腔镜与传统开腹根治术治疗进展期胃癌临床效果对比研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(11):1471-1473,1551.
 YU Wei,GAO Huaijun.Clinical study of laparoscopic radical resection and traditional open radical resection with advanced gastric cancer[J].,2019,(11):1471-1473,1551.
点击复制

腹腔镜与传统开腹根治术治疗进展期胃癌临床效果对比研究*
分享到:

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年11期
页码:
1471-1473,1551
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical study of laparoscopic radical resection and traditional open radical resection with advanced gastric cancer
文章编号:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2019.11.017
作者:
余 伟高怀军△
陕西省榆林市中医医院普外科(榆林 719000)
Author(s):
YU WeiGAO Huaijun
Department of General Surgery, Yulin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Shaanxi Province(Yulin 719000)
关键词:
进展期胃癌治疗腹腔镜根治术开腹根治术淋巴结清扫胃肠功能
Keywords:
Key words Advanced gastric cancerTherapyLaparoscopic radical surgeryOpen radical surgeryLymphnode dissectionGastrointestinal function
分类号:
R7352
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的:探讨腹腔镜下根治术与传统开腹根治术治疗进展期胃癌患者的临床疗效。方法:157例进展期胃癌患者随机分为腔镜组(n=79)和开腹组(n=78)。开腹组给予常规传统开腹根治术,腔镜组给予腹腔镜下根治术。观察比较两组临床疗效、术中出血量、住院时间、术后排气时间、手术时间、SF36评分及并发症发生情况。结果:腔镜组有效率为9747%,明显高于开腹组9487%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<001)。腔镜组术中出血量、住院时间及术后排气时间均低于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义(P<001);腔镜组手术时间则高于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P<001)。腔镜组和开腹组术后SF36评分与术前比较均显著升高,差异有统计学意义(P<001);腔镜组SF36评分(7867±1542)显著高于开腹组(7211±2052),差异有统计学意义(P<005)。腔镜组术后并发症发生率506%显著低于开腹组1538%,差异有统计学意义(P<005)。结论:腹腔镜下根治术治疗进展期胃癌临床疗效显著,可有效减少术中出血量,缩短住院时间,促进患者恢复,提高患者生活质量,安全性高。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection and traditional open radical resection for advanced gastric cancer.Methods:157 patients admitted were randomly divided into laparoscopic group (n=79) and laparotomy group (n=78).The laparotomy group was treated by conventional open radical operation,and the laparoscopic group was treated by laparoscopic radical operationThe clinical efficacy,intraoperative bleeding volume,hospital stay,postoperative exhaust time,operation time,SF36 score and complication were observed and compared between the two groups.Results:The effective rate of 9747% in laparoscopic group was statistically significantly higher than that of 9487% in laparotomy group(P<001).The amount of bleeding during operation,length of hospital stay and time of exhaust after operation in laparoscopic group were statistically significantly lower than those in laparotomy group,respectively (P<001).Additionally,the operation time in laparoscopic group was statistically higher than that in laparotomy group (P<001).The score of SF36 was significantly higher than those before operation either in laparoscopic group or in laparotomy group (P<001).The score of SF36 of (7867±1542)in laparoscopic group was statistically higher than that of (7211±2052)in laparotomy group (P<005).The incidence of complication of 506% in laparoscopic group was statistically lower than that of 1538% in laparotomy group (P<005).Conclusion:Laparoscopic radical resection for advanced gastric cancer has a significant clinical effect.It can effectively reduce intraoperative bleeding,shorten hospital stay,promote patient recovery,improve patient's quality of life.With a high safety,it is worthy of promotion and application.

参考文献/References:

[1] 葛晓明,孙晓光,杨 剑,等.腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的临床效果分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(7):6466,84.
[2] 张冬平,赵素莲.食管癌和胃癌内镜活检组织中肿瘤浸润T细胞的分布与病理分级研究[J]. 山西医药杂志,2014,43(3):274277.
[3] 吴海玲,李 浩,陈 鹭,等.星状神经节阻滞对行腹腔镜胃癌根治术老年患者术后认知功能、血清β淀粉样蛋白42及白细胞介素6水平的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2017,37(6):1455.
[4] 高小利,席云峰,寇 飞.进展期胃癌根治行腹主动脉旁淋巴结清除术56例临床分析[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2010,39(5):583584.
[5] 常 敏,张久聪,周 琴,等.胃癌流行病学研究进展[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2017,26(9):966969.
[6] 田 明,林小波.影响胃癌患者预后多因素相关性分析[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2014,43(12):16391641.〖JY〗(下转第1551页)〖FL)〗
[7] 李益萍,王 滢,崔 琼,等.腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗老年进展期胃癌的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(3):195199.
[8] 周路路,陆 媛,林谋斌. 腹腔镜结肠癌根治术及其临床应用[J]. 中国全科医学,2016,19(S1):221223.
[9] 王 进,郭绍春,樊 林,等.进展期胃癌腹腔镜辅助与开放D2根治术围手术期临床效果比较[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2016,24(7):10801082.
[10] 中华人民共和国卫生行业标准. 胃癌诊断标准(WS 3162010)\[Z\].20100801. 
[11] Nie Y,Wu K,Yu J,et al. A global burden of gastric cancer:the major impact of China[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2017,11(7):651661.
[12] 丁德胜. 腹腔镜辅助下远端胃癌D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效分析[J]. 中华全科医学,2016,14(8):13251326.
[13] 汪 雪,王梦桥,汪树林. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗老年进展期胃癌的临床疗效分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2016,21(10):733736.
[14] 李作周,马水英,王花丽. 开腹与腹腔镜胃癌根治术对老年进展期胃癌患者应激反应及免疫功能的影响[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(6):426429.
[15] 吴文生. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术对进展期胃癌患者应激反应及免疫功能的影响[J]. 医药论坛杂志,2018,39(12):105106.
[16] 谢景军. 腹腔镜下胃癌根治术治疗老年进展期胃癌的近远期疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(7):18451846.
[17] 高 阳. 腹腔镜下根治术与传统开腹根治术治疗进展期胃癌对比研究[J]. 实用临床医学,2018,19(6):3435.
[18] 张英杰,梁金荣. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌患者的近期疗效及对腹腔内微转移的影响[J]. 中华全科医学,2017,15(11):18671869,1890.
[19] Lan H,Zhu N,Lan Y,et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in China:an overview[J]. Hepatogastroenterology,2015,62(137):234239.
[20] 帅晓明,高金波,刘兴华,等.新辅助化疗联合腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2016,15(3):241246.
[21] 王进超. 进展期胃癌患者应用腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗的临床疗效对比[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗,2016,21(2):310312.
[22] 沈乃营,何盟国,王智翔,等.腹腔镜远端胃癌D2根治术在进展期胃癌中的临床应用价值[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2016,24(23):37783780.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐 博,苏军涛,钟 烨,等.外源性Apelin13对重症急性胰腺炎大鼠治疗作用及其机制研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):148.
 XU Bo,SU Juntao,ZHONG Ye,et al.Effect and mechanism of exogenous apelin13 on severe acute pancreatitis in rats[J].,2019,(11):148.
[2]陈保春,刘利峰.铥激光与等离子电切术治疗膀胱癌疗效对比研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):159.
 CHEN Baochun,LIU Lifeng..Comparative study of thulium laser and plasma electroresection in resection of bladder tumor[J].,2019,(11):159.
[3]张玉亮,朱 宏,戴洪山△.B超引导经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术在胆源性胰腺炎治疗中的临床意义[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):166.
 ZHANG Yuliang,ZHU Hong,DAI Hongshan..Clinical significance of Bmode ultrasound guided percutaneous transhepatic  gallbladder puncture and drainage in the treatment of biliary pancreatitis[J].,2019,(11):166.
[4]徐建庆,买赛虎△,杨喜佳,等.腹腔镜手术治疗复杂性胆囊炎临床疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):176.
 XU Jianqing,MAI Saihu,YANG Xijia,et al.Analysis of curative effect in laparoscopic surgery for complicated cholecystitis[J].,2019,(11):176.
[5]刘 侃,杨栓元,刘旭晨,等.PPH术治疗III、IV度痔中长期疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):183.
 LIU Kan,YANG Shuanyuan,LIU Xucheng,et al.Curative effect of PPH for III and IV hemorrhoids[J].,2019,(11):183.
[6]石 丹,张会久,周达岸.闭合复位经皮空心螺钉内固定与切开复位内固定治疗踝关节骨折疗效对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):186.
 SHI Dan,ZHANG Huijiu,ZHOU Daan..Comparison of closed reduction, percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and open reduction  and internal fixation for ankle fractures[J].,2019,(11):186.
[7]肖东波.不保留小关节植骨床PLIF术治疗老年脊柱退行性疾病价值研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):189.
 XIAO Dongbo..The value of nonreserving small arthroplasty bone PLIF for senile spinal degenerative diseases[J].,2019,(11):189.
[8]高清滢,侯洁心△.高频电波刀宫颈电环切除术治疗中重度宫颈柱状上皮异位临床疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):223.
 GAO Qingying,HOU Jiexin..Observation on the clinical effect of high frequency electric wave knife cervix electroloop resection in the〖JP〗 〖JP4〗treatment of moderate and severe Cervical columnar epithelium ectopicdiagnosed by pathological examination[J].,2019,(11):223.
[9]宋 婷,罗 莉,贾 菲,等.1540 nm非剥脱性点阵激光联合水凝胶医用冷敷贴治疗 凹陷性痤疮瘢痕疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):241.
 SONG Ting,LUO Li,JIA Fei,et al.Effiicacy of nonablative 1540nm fractional laser with medical cool patch in the treatment of acne sca[J].,2019,(11):241.
[10]张 彦,陈 龙.胃镜下肾上腺素与凝血酶联合治疗消化性溃疡合并出血疗效研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(2):259.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*陕西省社会发展科技攻关项目(2015SF068)
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-15