[1]马永琴,郑 玲△,杨爱君,等.不同脐动脉血流S/D值联合胎心监测对胎儿窘迫的诊断价值研究*[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(6):744-747.
　MA Yongqin,ZHENG Ling,YANG Aijun,et al.Diagnostic value of different umbilical arterial blood flow S/D value combined with fetal heart rate monitoring for fetal distress[J].,2019,(6):744-747.
点击复制

不同脐动脉血流S/D值联合胎心监测对胎儿窘迫的诊断价值研究*
分享到：

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年6期
页码:
744-747
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Diagnostic value of different umbilical arterial blood flow S/D value combined with fetal heart rate monitoring for fetal distress
文章编号:
DOI:〖HT5K〗10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2019.06.017
作者:
马永琴;  郑 玲△;  杨爱君;  刘 青
西安市第四医院妇产科(西安710004)
Author(s):
MA Yongqin;  ZHENG Ling;  YANG Aijun;  et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Xi’an No.4 Hospital(Xi’an710004)
关键词:
脐动脉血流S/D值;  胎心监测; 胎儿窘迫; 诊断
Keywords:
Key words Umbilical artery blood flow SD value;  Heart rate monitoring; Fetal distress; Diagnosis
分类号:
R714.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 〖HT5K〗 目的：研究不同脐动脉血流SD值联合胎心监测对胎儿窘迫的诊断价值。 方法：选取产检并分娩的S/D≥3的孕妇95例作为高危组，S/D＜3的孕妇232例作为对照组，进行脐动脉血流S/D值和胎心监测。根据诊断结果观察并比较两组孕妇出生1min Apgar评分、羊水污染、生产时迟发减速、新生儿体重、剖宫产、NST异常和胎儿宫内窘迫的发生率；分析并比较两组孕妇胎心监测、脐动脉血流S/D值以及二者联合检测的诊断敏感度、特异度和符合率。结果：高危组孕妇出生1min Apgar评分，羊水污染，生产时迟发减速，新生儿体重，剖宫产，NST异常和胎儿宫内窘迫的发生率显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）。脐动脉血流S/D诊断敏感度87.18%，特异度89.16%，符合率88.69%。胎心监测诊断敏感73.07%，特异度88.35%，符合率84.71%。脐动脉血流S/D联合胎心监测诊断敏感度97.43%，特异度91.97%，符合率93.27%。与胎心监测相比，脐动脉血流S/D监测诊断敏感度和符合率显著增高（P＜0.05）。联合检测诊断敏感度、特异度和符合率显著高于胎心监测和脐动脉血流S/D监测（P＜0.05）。结论：不同脐动脉血流S/D值联合胎心监测可显著提高胎儿窘迫检出率，在临床诊断中能够提供较为可靠的依据，且其操作简便、无创、安全。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective: To study diagnostic value of different umbilical arterial blood flow S/D value combined with fetal heart rate monitoring for fetal distress. Methods: 95 pregnant women with S/D≥3 who were admitted for childbirth and delivery were selected as high-risk group, and 232 pregnant women with S/D<3 were used as control group. S/D value and fetal heart rate of umbilical artery blood flow were monitored . According to the diagnosis results, the Apgar score, amniotic fluid pollution, delayed deceleration during production, neonatal weight, cesarean section, NST abnormality and intrauterine distress were observed and compared between the two groups. The fetal heart rate monitoring, snorkel blood flow S/D value and the combined sensitivity, specificity and coincidence rate of the two groups were analyzed and compared.Results: The high-risk group of pregnant women with 1 min Apgar score, amniotic fluid pollution, delayed deceleration during production, neonatal weight, cesarean section, NST abnormalities and intrauterine distress were significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). The sensitivity of S/D diagnosis of umbilical artery blood flow was 87.18%, the specificity was 89.16%, and the coincidence rate was 88.69%. The diagnostic sensitivity of fetal heart monitoring was 73.07%, the specificity was 88.35%, and the coincidence rate was 84.71%. The sensitivity of umbilical artery blood flow S/D combined with fetal heart rate monitoring was 97.43%, the specificity was 91.97%, and the coincidence rate was 93.27%. Compared with fetal heart monitoring, the diagnostic sensitivity and compliance rate of umbilical arterial blood flow S/D monitoring were significantly higher (P<0.05). Sensitivity, specificity and coincidence rate of combined detection were significantly higher than fetal heart rate monitoring and umbilical artery blood flow S/D monitoring (P<0.05).Conclusion: Different umbilical arterial blood flow S/D values combined with fetal heart rate monitoring can significantly improve the detection rate of fetal distress, provide a reliable basis in clinical diagnosis, and its operation is simple, non-invasive and safe.〖LM〗

参考文献/References:

[1] 赵仙芝. 胎儿窘迫及新生儿窒息的围产期高危因素分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(11):201-202.
[2] 严玺德,宗尚华,周春燕,等. 超声对宫内窘迫胎儿动脉血流动力学分析[J]. 临床超声医学杂志,2015,17(2):140-141.
[3] 时冬冬,周毓青. 胎儿宫内窘迫的监测及超声应用[J]. 医学综述,2014,20(8):1471-1474.
[4] Snyder Y, Donlin Smith C, Snyder E, et al. The course and outcome of pregnancy in women with nondystrophic myotonias[J]. Muscle & Nerve, 2016, 52(6):1013-1015.
[5] 武孟香,曹艳华,许燕丽. 围生期高危因素与胎儿宫内窘迫及新生儿窒息的相关性分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2012,27(9):1316-1317.
[6] 苗春菊, 沈霞明. 宫内及产后干预对胎儿窘迫围产儿预后的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2013, 17(23):169.
[7] 邹春艳,刘 勇,杨 璐,等. 胎心监护联合脐血流测定对胎儿宫内窘迫诊断的意义[J]. 检验医学与临床,2014,11(09):1177-1178,1181.
[8] 肖迎聪, 何 鸳, 骆会婷. 超声多普勒评估正常胎儿脐动脉、大脑中动脉血流参数临床研究[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2017, 46(7):884-887.
[9] 曹瑞红, 武斌杰, 王亮芝. 胎心监测联合脐血流S/D检测对胎儿窘迫的预测价值研究[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(6):62-63.
[10] 邱秀红,黄秀霞. 胎儿宫内窘迫的早期诊断及处理探讨[J]. 中医临床研究,2014,6(18):123-125.
[11] 宋学婷. 胎心监测仪联合彩色多普勒超声检测胎儿窘迫的临床分析[J]. 中国医学装备, 2016, 13(5):110-112.
[12] 阙贵珍,雷巧茹,何金杏,等. 胎监联合脐血流S/D比值预测胎儿宫内窘迫的临床意义[J]. 中国医药科学,2015,5(10):65-67.
[13] 丁 洁. 胎儿脐动脉、大脑中动脉及肾动脉血流参数及其比值对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[D].苏州大学,2017.
[14] 刘 敏. 胎心监测联合脐血流S/D检测预测胎儿窘迫的价值[J]. 中国实用医药, 2016，(6):126-127.
[15] 张 慧, 贺青文, 张顺仓,等. 产前超声联合胎心监测预测胎儿宫内窘迫的准确性研究[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2017, 34(11):1588-1590.
[16] 顾莲萍. 275例妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症孕妇羊水性状与妊娠结局的研究[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2014，43(4):438-439.
[17] 陈 伟, 张东升, 孔德岗. 联合胎儿脐动脉及大脑中动脉血流动力学指标在检测妊娠晚期胎儿宫内窘迫中的应用[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2017, 46(18):2221-2223.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
不同脐动脉血流S/D值联合胎心监测对胎儿窘迫的诊断价值研究*
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-20