[1]刘科,王雯.细胞块和免疫细胞学在浆膜腔积液检查中的临床病理分析[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,(1):114-116.
 LIU Ke,WANG Wen..Clinicopathological analysis of cell mass and immunocytology inserous cavity effusion[J].,2019,(1):114-116.
点击复制

细胞块和免疫细胞学在浆膜腔积液检查中的临床病理分析
分享到:

《陕西医学杂志》[ISSN:1000-7377/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年1期
页码:
114-116
栏目:
临床病理
出版日期:
2019-01-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinicopathological analysis of cell mass and immunocytology inserous cavity effusion
文章编号:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007377.2019.01.036
作者:
刘科王雯
陕西省商洛市中心医院病理科(商洛726000 )
Author(s):
LIU KeWANG Wen.
Department of Pathology Shangluo Central Hospital in Shaanxi Province(Shangluo 726000)
关键词:
浆膜腔积液细胞块切片免疫组织化学染色病理分析HE染色细胞学涂片
Keywords:
Key words Dropsy of serous cavityCell block slicesImmunohistochemical stainingPathology analysisHE stuiningCytology picture
分类号:
R733
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的:分析浆膜腔积液细胞块技术联合免疫细胞化学在浆膜腔积液细胞学病理诊断中的临床价值。方法:收集98例浆膜腔积液标本,进行常规细胞学涂片,细胞块切片HE染色,并用98例细胞块切片做甲状腺转录因子1(Thyroid transcription factor1,TTF1),人绒毛蛋白(Villin),癌胚抗原(CEA),钙视网膜蛋白(Calretinin),NapsinA、CDX2、Pax8行免疫细胞化学染色。结合临床一般资料和随访结果进行统计学分析。结果:98例浆膜腔积液中,常规细胞学涂片阳性率为25.5%,阴性率为64.3%,不确定率为10.2%;细胞块切片HE染色阳性率为26.5%,阴性率为62.2%,不确定率为11.3%;常规细胞学涂片和细胞块切片HE染色检查结果的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。细胞块切片免疫细胞化学染色阳性率为38.8%,阴性率为56.1%,不确定率为5.1%;综合诊断阳性率为38.8%,阴性率为57.14%,不确定率为4.08%;细胞块切片免疫细胞化学染色不确定率低于常规细胞学涂片和细胞块切片HE染色(P<0.05)。结论:细胞块切片免疫细胞化学染色与常规细胞学涂片相比,明显提高浆膜腔积液的阳性检出率,且对肿瘤细胞的来源判断有较大帮助。
Abstract:
AbstractObjective:to analyze the clinical value of cell mass technique combined with immunocytochemistry in the pathological diagnosis of serous effusion.Methods:98 samples of serous effusion were collected for routine cytological smear and HE staining of cell sections. TIF1,villin,CEA,Calretinin,NapsinA,CDX2,Pax8 was stained by immunocytochemical staining. Statistics combined with general clinical data and followup results Scientific analysis. Results:the positive rate of routine cytologic smear was 25.5% in 98 cases of serous cavity effusion,the negative rate was 64.3% and the uncertainty rate was 10.2% .The positive rate of HE staining was 26.5%,the negative rate was 62.2% and the uncertainty rate was 11.3%. There was no significant difference in the results of HE staining between conventional cytologic smears and cell sections (P>0. 05). The positive rate of immunocytochemical staining was 38.8%,the negative rate was 56.1%,the uncertainty rate was 5.1%,the positive rate of comprehensive diagnosis was 38.8%,the negative rate was 57.14%. The fixed rate was 4.08 and the uncertainty rate of immunocytochemical staining was lower than that of conventional cytological smear and HE staining of cell slice (P<0. 05).Conclusion:compared with conventional cytological smears,immunocytochemical staining of cell sections can significantly improve the positive detection rate of serous effusion,and can be of great help in judging the origin of tumor cells,which is worth popularizing.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈博,徐阿曼,胡孔旺,等. 营养支持干预对有营养风险胃肠恶性肿瘤病人临床结局和成本效果比的影响[J]. 肠外与肠内营养,2016,23(2):7881. [2]闫立志. 脱落细胞学联合CEA,CA125,CA153,CA199检测在诊断恶性浆膜腔积液中的应用效果观察[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志,2018(34). [3]张建锋,张曙霞,李君. 黏膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤分子病理诊断探讨[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志,2015,23(3):689692. [4]王炳淑,刘友斌,卜平凤,等. 细胞沉渣石蜡包埋、免疫组织化学染色病理检查对浆膜腔积液的定性诊断价值[J]. 山东医药,2015,23(28):9899. [5]丁彩霞,黄颖楠,张娟,等. 细胞蜡块在恶性浆膜腔积液中的应用[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2016,45(4):387388. [6]阎红琳,袁静萍,刘琳,等. 细胞蜡块结合免疫细胞化学在浆膜腔积液病理诊断中的应用[J]. 临床与实验病理学杂志,2016,32(12):14141415. [7]齐晓岚. 细胞学腊块联合免疫组织化学在145例浆膜腔积液检查中的临床病理分析[J]. 中国冶金工业医学杂志,2018,1:156159. [8]王雅萍. 细胞沉渣石蜡包埋、免疫组织化学染色病理检查对判断浆膜腔积液良恶性的价值分析[J]. 数理医药学杂志,2017,30(9):13031304. [9]曾涛,翁永彬,杨宗梅,等. 甲状腺转录因子及NapsinA在肺腺癌转移至浆膜腔积液脱落细胞中的表达[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2016,13(3):6264.〖ZK)〗 [10]张燕,史文雯.血清CA125、HE4及MMP10联合检测在卵巢癌早期诊断中的临床价值研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2018,47(8):10721074.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-22